There’s no removed comments. I looked through my profile cause like sometimes I just be saying shit so I was okay maybe. But I can’t find any comments on that community. Just the old 196.

Idk if this is where to post this but I just wanted to rant. It’s my first time ever being banned so it felt ouch.

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeEnglish
    7·
    1 day ago

    the biggest poster on 196 was banned for saying “i respect neopronouns BUT your policy of not allowing harassment for neopronouns isn’t for me and so i am preemptively leaving” while screaming stuff about how dragons aren’t real instead of just blocking and reporting offensive users as the mods explicitly asked.

    to clarify. it’s a bit worse than you express. :)

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeEnglish
        4·
        1 day ago

        nope, clarified some other details in an edit thanks for holding me accountable

      • petrol_sniff_king
        7·
        1 day ago

        Question: If we found the skeletal remains of a dragon in east asia somewhere, would you then be fine with ‘dragon’ as a neo-pronoun?

        You seem to think this is self-evidently obvious.

            • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              11·
              1 day ago

              Why are you even choosing to engage in that point it’s a worthless argument considering that whether a dragon is real or not they have tremendous cultural symbolism and nearly universal recognition. It’s a worthless argument to say dragons aren’t real so identification with a dragon is invalid. And really this is just one of those “is it offensive to say a trans woman doesn’t have a cervix arguments” that you see transphobes try and do to test if it’s taken transphobic or not and claim they’re just playing around with facts and logic. In reality this kind of thing is just being testy to see how much people will tolerate, the answer is they don’t tolerate it when they see what the person is doing.

              • petrol_sniff_king
                5·
                1 day ago

                Ohhh, so it doesn’t matter. I see.

                You should just say “human beings are not lizards,” then. Your focus on them being real or not is sleight of hand. It’s dishonest. It suggests you’re insecure about your real ideas not being very likeable.

                [edit] They got deleted. xD Oof.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeEnglish
        4·
        1 day ago

        you’d be funny if you weren’t so sadly acerbic about this.

        You were quite clear that you regarded a cis person daring to express disagreement [NOT “dispute her rights”] with someone who is trans [about how to run a space she owns in order to mitigate hate speech against her own identity] as ‘entitlement’,

        ftfy.*

        that saying “dragons aren’t real” is “invalidating behavior”

        in this context, yes it absolutely was. i and the vast majority of 196 users stand by this.

        and that thinking [saying in the context of a trans woman asking you not to negatively engage with suspected trolls on the basis of their pronouns] that dragons aren’t real is a form of thoughtcrime [toxicity to a space already vulnerable to that kind of rhetoric] which expresses intent to not use neopronouns in the future

        ftfy

        *edited this to address your goalpost moving regarding expressing disagreement ~> disputing rights because i don’t care enough to merit you with a reply