you’d be funny if you weren’t so sadly acerbic about this.

You were quite clear that you regarded a cis person daring to express disagreement [NOT “dispute her rights”] with someone who is trans [about how to run a space she owns in order to mitigate hate speech against her own identity] as ‘entitlement’,

ftfy.*

that saying “dragons aren’t real” is “invalidating behavior”

in this context, yes it absolutely was. i and the vast majority of 196 users stand by this.

and that thinking [saying in the context of a trans woman asking you not to negatively engage with suspected trolls on the basis of their pronouns] that dragons aren’t real is a form of thoughtcrime [toxicity to a space already vulnerable to that kind of rhetoric] which expresses intent to not use neopronouns in the future

ftfy

*edited this to address your goalpost moving regarding expressing disagreement ~> disputing rights because i don’t care enough to merit you with a reply