KEY POINTS

House Republicans are considering treating work benefits such as employer-provided transportation, free food and on-site gyms as a new source of taxable income to help pay for President Trump’s tax cuts.

These tax proposals are still in the early stages and other aspects of Trump’s tax promises would help workers, such as tax breaks on tips, overtime pay and Social Security benefits.

The concept of taxing employee perks has been debated before in Congress and never made it far, but with the size of the deficit and Trump wanting trillions of dollars in expiring and new tax cuts, some budget pay-fors will need to be found, and this one would dip into workers’ pockets.

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Everyone who votes republican should be shot dead. They’re either too stupid to be trusted, or too evil.

  • Kit
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Companies will just get rid of those perks, won’t they?

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        in australia, we call this fringe benefits tax and it’s paid by the employer. it tends to lead to employers giving less of these benefits, which was the point: it raises salary by a reasonably comenceate amount so employees receive actual wages rather than benefits that they have no choice over

        interesting side effect is that there’s some FBT stuff that doesn’t apply to charities, so you can do a thing called “salary sacrifice” (which is a well known, approved by the govt thing) where you pay some of your pre-tax salary thereby reducing your taxable income, but the charity doesn’t have to pay FBT. it’s a cheap way of providing charities with ways of incentivising their employees to stay

        if you’re interested:

        https://www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/hiring-and-paying-your-workers/fringe-benefits-tax

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m sure there’s enough companies around who like employees beholden to them on account of granting the privilege of health insurance and the like.

      • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I took “treating work benefits such as employer-provided transportation, free food and on-site gyms as a new source of taxable income” as this will be taxed on the employer side because these things don’t come out of person’s paycheck, directly. The company supplies it as an incentive to work there.

        • nocturne@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Taxing employees for fringe benefits such as employer-provided transportation, free food and on-site gyms is up for discussion.

          • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yea but, again. Fringe benefits are what employers give to the employees. I don’t pay for access to my company gym.

                • nocturne@sopuli.xyzOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  If enacted, workers would likely have to pay income tax on the fair market value of the fringe benefits they are getting from their employer, said Jeff Martin, tax principal at Grant Thornton’s Washington National Tax Office. This would make these benefits less valuable to employees when taxes are factored in.