• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    The first books the Nazis burned were scientific research notes about trans people.

  • Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    50 minutes ago

    The CDC has instructed its scientists to retract or pause the publication of any research manuscript being considered by any medical or scientific journal, not merely its own internal periodicals

    The scope is thankfully limited only to CDC scientists.

    Not that this makes it good news by any stretch.

    This is going to push research money squarely under the thumb of corporate control, which is of course the aim here. Privatize everything.

    I do know scientists hate having their work paywalled or censored so I’d expect sci-hub to get a lot more popular real quick, but many will definitely self censor their official publications to keep their jobs til orange hitler shoots himself in a bunker somewhere.

  • Tin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 hours ago

    “forbidden terms”

    …must be that “free speech” I keep hearing about. This is obviously a first amendment issue, right?

    Right?

  • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Are you fucking kidding me?!?! What the fuck is wrong with that orange fucking clown? Jesus fuckjng christ.

  • WhatYouNeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    How long until this evil administration forces some citizens to sew a yellow star or pink triangle on their clothes?

    • Shortstack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yellow star is so last world war.

      It’ll definitely be pink triangles and moon and star this go around

  • Stormdancer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What the actual fuck?! It’s like living in a fever-driven nightmare. We can only hope there are backups of the un-purged documents.

  • MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Don’t they know just because you’ve banned a word, doesn’t mean that the item or thing automatically poofs out of existence?

    This is that easy. There’s a few words I’d love to ban. How about Elmo? And Turd

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s just the first step. You don’t acknowledge they exist on paper or in speech. That makes it much easier to turn against them physically. It’s still up in the air whether or not they take the final steps of making their existence illegal. I think they will.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Wiping trans people from existence is easier for them to do when nobody is allowed to talk about them.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Unfortunately, this kind of control of language does work in the long term.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is pretty dumb even by trump standards. You would think the right of all people would know that trying to ban terms will just result in new euphemisms and jargon being created.

    Most of the research caught up is probably going to be using the terms incidentally (for instance, a drug study that happens to mention participants were AMAB) and this will cause a bunch of paperwork and probably just end up being changed to something like “gametically” or “chromosomally”.

    • fishos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Think even more general than that. Ignore identity/gender/sexuality issues for a moment. How do you write a research article about the negative effects of a drug on pregnancy without using the word pregnant? About complications during a “normal pregnancy”(I’m using their word, not mine - please don’t take offense - I hope you see where I’m going)? If you can’t mention gender or pregnancy, even when it’s about cis people, you suddenly can’t do a whole hell of a lot of research.

    • spooky2092
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You would think the right of all people would know that trying to ban terms will just result in new euphemisms and jargon being created.

      The right thinks that if they clamp down hard enough that it will just go away, much like LGBTQ people were forced to mask and hide themselves like they had to back in the day, otherwise they ended up like Matthew Shepard. I don’t know that they even consider the euphemism treadmill aspect of things, they just don’t want these people to feel like they can be themselves and feel safe.