• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you ask me, this looks like a big possibility, as X/Twitter’s evident bias towards the newly established U.S. government and their favoring of one demographic over the other could have set off Debian’s move.

    That’s just me speculating, though. 🙃

    No, you got it right. I get that you need to cover your ass to avoid a lawsuit, but it’s exactly because a guy who loves the adoration of nazis owns the platform.

  • VandimionDevilChild@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    didn’t even knew they had an account there, good can’t see how twitter could ever be a good fit for Debian values or any person with who care about foss.

  • PlainSimpleGarak@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    How does one not feel safe on a digital platform? Even if someone physically threatens you, nothing is going to happen to you. And you can block/mute people you don’t care for.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    The “safety” thing is a bit hyperbolic. I wish they’d just say “the quality of the interactions is going down” or “poor moderation” or something else a little more honest.

    Twitter is a shitty platform in structure, format, and moderation. I’m glad Debian’s not on it. But I am disappointed in them for using hyperbolic rhetoric.

    • spoopy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Safe is a very broad term. Its not being used hyperbolically here. It’s not referring to physical safety.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah I’m aware that it means “emotional safey” the way they’re using it. But they’re still being hyperbolic, because emotional safety in the context of opinions on the Internet is just not meaningful. In a relationship one can speak of emotional safety in context of emotional manipulation or violence, but on a microblogging platform? The axiom of Tyler the Creator still applies, and we’re not even talking about targeted harassment.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    217
    ·
    8 days ago

    Personally, I think that the discussion around this will evolve as the news spreads, but I agree with Robert on this one. Sure, X/Twitter has become a less welcoming place than before, but shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn’t a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

    Nah, I think I’m cool if Debian doesn’t respect the input of Nazi sympathisers.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      8 days ago

      Yeah, that section is bad.

      For one, it’s has classic vibe “if you want to keep the nazis out, you’re the one who’s exclusionary”.

      But also, how is refusing to engage on a platform “shutting out a significant portion of [the] community”? That sounds backwards to me. Blocking people from engaging with Debian on its own platforms would be shutting them out. The implication in the article is that Debian is obligated to be unconditionally present on every social platform its users might be on.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        ·
        8 days ago

        The other twist is, unlike Xitter, you don’t have to create an account on Mastodon to be able to read their feed. You can access it like any other website. So nobody is getting shut out. They’re just posting elsewhere, where anyone can read it.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          8 days ago

          You don’t even have to go to the website. Every Mastodon feed can be accessed via RSS. You just have to add “.rss” to the end of the URL.

      • Naia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 days ago

        The problem is for organizations it’s harder to leave because that is where the people you want to reach are. That’s the only reason any org or company is on social media in the first place. If they leave too soon they risk too many people not seeing the things they send out to the community.

        It’s more an individual thing because so many people just have social inertia and haven’t left since everyone they know is already there. The first to leave have to decide if they want to juggle using another platform to keep connections or cut off connections by abandoning the established platform.

        • ericjmorey@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          That doesn’t explain why they don’t start a transition by posting to both the new platform and the old. And not including links to their new account on their websites.

          • IdleSheep
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Doesn’t Twitter directly suppress such links? I remember there was a crackdown on people linking their mastodon accounts a while back.

            And external links in general get a huge suppression in the algorithm because Twitter does not want to recommend tweets that take you off the site.

            The platform actively fights you if you want to move elsewhere (which should really be a telltale sign for you to move), so I get why some orgs struggle with that decision. Doubly so if your job relies on the platform’s outreach.

      • xor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        That’s a very silly take

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    7 days ago

    When it forces you to log in to view stuff, it’s usefulness as a platform for announcements is substantially lessened.