• rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn’t a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

    Ironic when X shuts out anyone who isn’t logged in and shuts out anyone who doesn’t pay for a blue checkmark from having visible replies.

    Having an X account isn’t consequence-free - if it becomes where updates occur, people have to sign up for an account and subject themselves to nazis everywhere and all manner of crypto spam just to see updates. And they have to pay Elon tribute to be heard in response. It’s crazy that anyone sees it as being friendly to users.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 hours ago

    When it forces you to log in to view stuff, it’s usefulness as a platform for announcements is substantially lessened.

  • nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 hours ago

    shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn’t a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

    It actually is a perfectly sensible move, and it doesn’t “shut out” anyone. If anything, prioritizing twitter is what shuts users out. They linked to two-three alternatives. What’s the argument here, exactly, from the other side?

  • markstos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 hours ago

    My town’s subreddit just started a policy to disallow links to X for similar reasons.

    There is a movement to avoid the platform.

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The reasons (summarized using Copilot):

    • The platform no longer aligns with Debian’s values, social contract, code of conduct, and diversity statement.
    • Concerns over X becoming a place where people they care about don’t feel safe.
    • Abuse on the platform happening without consequences.
    • Issues with misinformation and lack of moderation.
    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That first reply highlights a major difference in how people approach the world.

      Speaking very generally, conservatism and right wing politics seen to attract those who see everything as a competition and that dominating other people is what it means to be a good person. Funny that it also leads to frustrated, angry, isolated people.

      So if we want to switch to using a website that doesn’t promote hurting/killing 2% of the population, we are now BOWING DOWN to the minority some of us would not rather murder.

      It’s the same reason they hate DEI so much.

      • IdleSheep
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        This is to me one of the major reasons Twitter discourse is completely ruined and the platform is mostly useless for seeing what people think now.

        When the only people who get to be at the top of discussions are people who pay for twitter, the only opinions that get shared are those that are pro Twitter, pro Elon, etc. Because they have a direct stake in the game.

        And that’s if the accounts posting aren’t all bots that pay for a checkmark to boost engagement, which is almost all I see when I occasionally have to check Twitter these days.

        So glad more people are leaving it. There’s nothing to gain from it anymore.

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Honestly I had the same thought. But on the other hand, internet outrage talking points have also become extremely formulaic…

    • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      It is depressing, but I try not to forget we are seeing a sort of survivorship bias of stupidity on the former Twitter at this point. The cohort of remaining posting accounts is dumber and dumber on average. And this dynamic is magnified in the replies, because they are paid blue accounts at the top. Eg, self-selected losers. (The top account has likely just hidden their checkmark)

      Edit: PS, are you still using Nitter? I thought it had died?

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I didn’t really need another reason to love Debian more but here we are… I’m donating to Debian today

    • SVcrossDO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Oh I like that rhythm.

      "I’m lock up, no way Corps and hearsay Brought me to jail FOSS not too late

      All I say is I’m donating to debian today"

  • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is a great example of where linking to a blog post about an announcement is better than linking to the announcement itself:

    after digging a bit deeper, I discovered that there was originally a longer, more detailed announcement that was later scrapped. I found it in a GitLab commit made by Jean. [Link to GitLab comment in article]

    Good job, itsfoss.com

      • xor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s a very silly take

      • Naia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The problem is for organizations it’s harder to leave because that is where the people you want to reach are. That’s the only reason any org or company is on social media in the first place. If they leave too soon they risk too many people not seeing the things they send out to the community.

        It’s more an individual thing because so many people just have social inertia and haven’t left since everyone they know is already there. The first to leave have to decide if they want to juggle using another platform to keep connections or cut off connections by abandoning the established platform.

        • ericjmorey@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          That doesn’t explain why they don’t start a transition by posting to both the new platform and the old. And not including links to their new account on their websites.

          • IdleSheep
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Doesn’t Twitter directly suppress such links? I remember there was a crackdown on people linking their mastodon accounts a while back.

            And external links in general get a huge suppression in the algorithm because Twitter does not want to recommend tweets that take you off the site.

            The platform actively fights you if you want to move elsewhere (which should really be a telltale sign for you to move), so I get why some orgs struggle with that decision. Doubly so if your job relies on the platform’s outreach.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    181
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Personally, I think that the discussion around this will evolve as the news spreads, but I agree with Robert on this one. Sure, X/Twitter has become a less welcoming place than before, but shutting out a significant portion of your community without seeking their input first isn’t a sensible move for such a foundational open source project.

    Nah, I think I’m cool if Debian doesn’t respect the input of Nazi sympathisers.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, that section is bad.

      For one, it’s has classic vibe “if you want to keep the nazis out, you’re the one who’s exclusionary”.

      But also, how is refusing to engage on a platform “shutting out a significant portion of [the] community”? That sounds backwards to me. Blocking people from engaging with Debian on its own platforms would be shutting them out. The implication in the article is that Debian is obligated to be unconditionally present on every social platform its users might be on.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The other twist is, unlike Xitter, you don’t have to create an account on Mastodon to be able to read their feed. You can access it like any other website. So nobody is getting shut out. They’re just posting elsewhere, where anyone can read it.

        • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You don’t even have to go to the website. Every Mastodon feed can be accessed via RSS. You just have to add “.rss” to the end of the URL.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Yeay, Debian user here who also left Twitter/X for similar reasons. I was already on Mastodon and Bluesky but didn’t make a habit out of it. Leaving the bad platform entirely (and having my data archived and searchable) helped a lot.

    Glad to hear they moved on!

    • toastal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      & all the US-based corporate social media… Facebook, Instagram, Threads, WhatsApp, Snapchat, Reddit, Discord, LinkedIn, & GitHub.

      The VC-funded ones too like BlueSky

      • I’ve managed to ditch every single one of those except LinkedIn. We simply CANNOT get new clients without it. The lockin to that platform is truly terrifying. LinkedIn is a crime against humanity.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Question: how is LinkedIn useful to you?

          For me it’s just a non-stop swarm of recruiters from India who want me to kindly listen to their offer of a job that pays less than I’d make picking up garbage, utter sociopaths dredging up some psychotic hustle culture nonsense, and previous people I’ve worked with/for asking for favors, which of course means free.

          Is it somehow more useful for an actual business?

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        14 hours ago

        all of the corporate social media tbh. federation is the way out of this cycle.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think Bluesky can be an exception. I think it’s way better than Mastodon from a UX standpoint. And it’s still open.