🖕 Fuck PayPal

And fuck Linus Tech Tips for intentionally keeping quiet about this after they found out.

  • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Everybody: Fuck Peter Thiel, fuck Elon Musk, fuck Honey, Fuck PayPal

    Everybody: unflinchingly using PayPal

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I dunno, I stopped a while back, it wasn’t hard really. I’ve also heard that while they are usually fine with regular sums of money they are not to be trusted with large sums. Just word of mouth an I’ve got no proof but it put me off.

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Deleted my ebay account but very rarely will buy on it. I’ve yet to find a UK alternative.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They’re one of the largest tech media companies and deliberately chose to sweep this under the rug instead of reporting on it. Then they took sponsorships from Karma, which is a competitor to Honey that does the exact same thing.

      • Jin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, they are not one of largest tech media companies They have less than what 100 employees. Maybe you used the wrong term?

        When did they learn about it? Where your proof?

        • It’s the holidays and a lot of content of made awhile, I don’t expect them to make dedicated statement.
        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 hours ago

          First of all, Lemmy has a lot of users for whom English is a second language. So maybe don’t be a jackass about correcting grammar.

          Secondly, in case you happen to be in that group of people ‘largest media company’ in this context applies to their reach, and not to their actual size. They are ‘large’ because they have a large audience, generate a lot of revenue, and are worth a lot of money. LMG also comprises 10 different YouTube channels with maybe 10 billion views between them.

          • Jin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Look I’m not correcting grammar, I’m not native English speaker myself + I’m very dyslexic.

            But when someone says the biggest tech media companies, you put them in same category as Disney, Apple and so on, which makes them very small.

            • tabular@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Sometimes people exaggerate and if you point out what they said is inaccurate then they get mad you’re not addressing their main point.

              • Jin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                32 minutes ago

                People are going mad anyways, doesn’t really matter especially here on lemmy ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

                People are putting the blame on creators, instead of PayPal/honey, when creators are the victims too. We don’t know the full story from LLT from their side if “deliberately chose to sweep this under the rug instead of reporting on it

                If I’m questioning it, I’m going to get negative feedback because the narrative is they are to blame because they are “big”.

          • Jin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I watched it, but I’ll reserve my judgment until the next wan show because I don’t know if it has been mentioned before on an earlier show or how the problem has been interpret by staff.

            • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              8 hours ago

              … Ok well here’s the link to the moment (in the video you watched) where we have one **staff ** member giving an official response to how LTT interpreted the problem in a forum post on their website.

              https://youtu.be/vc4yL3YTwWk?t=811

              And here’s a link to their youtube channel where they talk about honey

              https://www.youtube.com/@LinusTechTips/search?query=honey

              You’ll notice. There isn’t one.

              So for at least two years, they knew honey was stealing affiliate links and considered it a big enough problem to end their partnership, but did not consider it a big enough issue to make a video on it.

              • Jin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I dunno why you keep sending me a bunch of text and videos. I’m going to wait until the next wan show, so I can understand what really happened inside.

    • nek0d3r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Agreed. I remember enjoying their workshop videos a long time ago, but they can’t even be trusted for PC building info, much less anything else.

  • M1nds3nd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ever since it was explained that Mr. Beast only smiles with his mouth, I get skeeved out every time I see him.

  • azalty@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just open their privacy policy and done. They sell your browsing info, and you could stop it there

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 day ago

      Was it all that surprising to you though?

      By the time honey hit the scene we had been ten years into “sketchy Browser extension that monitors your browsing habits and injects ads”

      I guess getting flogged by your favorite influencer ads a veneer of legitimacy for a lot of people.

      • dukeofdummies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I think what was truly surprising is that they were bought for 4 billion.That much money for… basically an out and out scam. Paypal is that sure that it’s:

        1. entirely legal

        2. Will never be stopped

        3. will return on a 4 billion investment.

        • eRac@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Rakuten is up front about it. They force their affiliate links, then pay you part of their cut.

          Honey forces their affiliate links in exchange for maybe finding you a discount code.

          • gt5@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I also think Rakuten compensates me fairly. I take the payout in Amex points. Instead of money they give me 1 cent per point which I can leverage to a value of around 5 cpp through transfers

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      I never trust browser extensions outside of a select few. However, I have used Paypal quite a bit. I would think many of us have.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t mind things that are an actual thing to buy. I want to research it first–you can get a better electric razor than Manscaped for not much more–but at least it’s clear how they make their money. Honey was obviously getting money from someone other than their users, and that’s an immediate red flag.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        I and many other people naturally assumed that honey was getting their money from consumer data collection. Which is why I didn’t use the service myself. The surprise is the fact that the scam isn’t just consumer data collection but actually stealing commissions from content creators as well as using consumers as a gateway to stealing money from businesses that they have contracts with.

      • riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah. PayPal bought a coupon browser extension for how much? If the only thing they do is save YOU money, how come they can afford a sponsored segment in a mr beast video?

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      This isn’t even remotely true. There are lots of advertisers and sponsors that aren’t scams. But unfortunately our consumer protection laws haven’t quite caught up to the digital marketplace. So there is a lot of room on the internet in general for scammy behavior.

      As always, it’s buyer beware. As well as a big amount of content creator beware as well.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If only they had some medium to post the information, perhaps a medium that that VAST MAJORITY of their viewers use.

      “But the plans were on display…”

      “On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.”

      “That’s the display department.”

      “With a flashlight.”

      “Ah, well, the lights had probably gone.”

      “So had the stairs.”

      “But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?”

      “Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard.”

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        They’re complaint was that honey inserted their affiliate cookie even when they didn’t find a coupon code for you. I doubt they knew the full extent of the scam.

        Plus, we don’t know what was in their contract with honey. They could still be subject to a non-disparagment clause.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 day ago

      They didn’t hide it, but a huge portion of their audience doesn’t read the forums. A 10 minute video of Linus ranting about them would have opened this scandal to a wider audience years ago.

      • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Linus usually likes to rant about it on the WAN show then they usually make a clip for YouTube, but weird he didn’t do that for honey, maybe he didn’t know how far the scam went.

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          1 day ago

          As creator that makes some of their profits from affiliate links, I don’t see how that could be the case for him.

          Seems more likely they had a reason to avoid beef with PayPal.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            non disparagement clause

            Not the level of a non-compete clause but that’s a scummy thing I hope is not legal.

            • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              It’s fairly common. As far as legal, that will depend on the jurisdiction and the mood of the judge.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        There may have been non-disclosure agreements between Linus tech tips and PayPal Honey. They may have threatened to sue him if he went public. I’m assuming we’ll find out the details in the next few weeks.

    • poke@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT. I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on, I think their forum post was good and I believe they even mentioned this functionality of Honey a few times on the WAN show. It wasn’t a secret, and anyone who cared to do in-depth research on a potential sponsor could have found out.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think this topic was worth them making a main channel video on

        Their viewers getting scammed by tech they promoted isn’t worth a video on their main channel? If they could legally do it I think they should have.

        Some very vocal people on Lemmy just love hating on LTT

        LTT have made mistakes (edit: and made choices/comments I would disprove of) but the dunking here does seem disproportionate.

      • sardaukar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        And yet here’s the scandal being exposed TWO YEARS LATER. Yeah, LTT couldn’t possibly have handled this better… /s

        • poke@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          They told everyone and nobody cared, turns out people care if a YouTube video is made framing the same thing differently. Like yeah, Honey’s practice is bad for the creator industry, but is it bad enough to bring it back to the people who took their money? No, I don’t think so.I think this is more of an example of how easy it is to get the masses angry with a YouTube video than anything. It’s good that more people are going to move away from this information harvesting app, but I really feel like the reaction and hatred is overblown and, at least for the hatred towards creators, unwarranted.

          The way I see it, people still take money from predatory gambling sites, and if any creator deserves pushback, it’s them.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, that not nothing but it isn’t far off. They have a massive platform. It deserved at least a video telling people about it.

    • galanthus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was a matter of time until the public found out about this. They couldn’t think in the long term, by not accepting a bit of backlash, exposing the scam they unknowingly participated in they only opened themselves up for more later.

      They are not only evil, they are stupid too, which is worse.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      OP isn’t exactly giving you the full story there. I know for a fact I’ve seen a video on this. I remember thinking at the time “well duh”.

  • jagermo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    251
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I said it in another post: if you see a bunch of influencers all suddenly peddling the same stuff, stay away. All of them can be bought.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        And Honey has always worked like this. So PayPal knew exactly what they were buying which explains the price tag. Paypal knew they were going to make their money back and then some.

  • pmc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly I thought all of this was common knowledge at this point, back when I used Honey (many years ago) I saw its affiliate code in the address bar and thought “huh, that’s how they make money”

    • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I remember researching it a while ago when I was curious how they made money. If anything else, this just illustrated glee little research and care people have with their online information.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    196
    ·
    2 days ago

    I never trusted Honey to begin with but this goes far deeper than I ever expected. I always wondered “yeah, but where do they get their money?” I always figured it was just a way to take people’s data and sell it to data brokers (which they probably also do, let’s be honest) but this is just blatant fraud. Stealing affiliate money from links and having companies pay them to purposefully give out worse coupon codes is just devious through and through. It’s basically free money and everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I always wondered what the catch was? The CEO was always posting on Reddit trying to defend honey and how cool they were.

      Either way, I never trust any shopping deal plugins. The whole idea of them is sketchy.

      • Electric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        Only shopping plugin I use is the one that comes with Edge. Surprisingly good to track price history and find other sites selling the product. I considered some Chrome plugin that displays an Amazon product’s country of origin to avoid Chinesium but apparently it didn’t work well or something like that from reading the reviews. Had some attached rewards function for shopping with it, ick.

        • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s funny how Edge got lambasted for it when they introduced that feature, but it’s legitimately super helpful and non-invasive.

          • Electric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I had no idea it was, I don’t keep up with browser news. I just wish they didn’t migrate to Chromium. It became my main browser for a brief period before that.

            I just used it randomly when I was working and doing some shopping for a computer in my downtime and decided to try out the feature. That and the AI are super good when combo’ed to shop smart. Managed to save $800 off a quality laptop.

      • reev@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        https://keepa.com/#!

        I use this extension to get a general idea of whether a product usually goes for cheaper and whether or not to wait. Really conveniently on the Amazon page directly.

    • Electric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 days ago

      I always assumed it was a combination of your guess and companies giving Honey special coupon codes so consumers are more eager to spend.

      “Hey Honey, we’ll give you 1% commission if you just host this HONEY5 coupon for 5% off.”

      That was my impression when I used it once. Wasn’t worth having an extension just for a slight discount. Love when a company doesn’t fulfill the service they advertise.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        But that would be an ethical business model, we can’t have that, this is PayPal and this is the internet. There’s no place for ethics in that combination.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      everybody else, whether influencer or consumer, get fucked over in the process.

      Enshittification correctly defined.

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same. I never downloaded it or anything like it but I didn’t realize they were playing both sides. It’s fucked.