Assuming I have a time horizon >10 years.

  • hobovision@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    24 minutes ago

    100% anything you can do is great.

    My girlfriend and I have each been putting $50/month into an investment account instead of paying for insurance for our dog, that way if she ever needs a big procedure I can pull money from there if I don’t have the savings for it. We’ve been doing this for 3.5 years and have now built up a good amount! I’ll divide the numbers roughly in 2 so you can see what you could be looking at:

    Total $2750.
    Deposits $2200.
    Gains $550.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      That $550 will cover two vet visits if you’re lucky

      Still better than pet insurance though, which is a scam (I mean all insurance is but especially pet insurance)

      • Kayday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 minutes ago

        I don’t know about that. Both of my cats would be dead if not for pet insurance. One needed a $10k surgery this summer that I was able to afford because of my pet insurance. The other had $4k of surgeries the year before. Both instances my insurance covered 70%. Neither of my cats are much more than 5 years old, just bad luck with their health.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If you bought bitcoin for $50 every month in the past 10 years, do you know how much you’d have today?

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Specifically if for retirement, time is your best friend. Anything you can put aside will be multiplied down the years and be much more when you need it most

  • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Yes. Investing is always worth it unless you have credit card debit.

    Set it up to automatically invest into the lowest fee index fund your broker offers.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Can you recommend a single ethical index fund? I’ve been searching for the past decade

        Every time I find one, I look at their holdings and see companies like Google, Meta, Tesla, and for profit banks.

      • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The post didn’t ask for ethical requirements to be included in the advice.

        Appending additional personal requirements turns the conversation towards one’s personal soapbox.

  • JackLSauce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    19 hours ago

    That’s 600/yr and a long enough horizon that most diverse portfolios are likely to be net positive (I’m seeing about 5,000 gained with 8% growth in a basic savings calculator)

    I’d spend those 10 years trying to free up cash flow but time’s a powerful weapon regardless

  • subtext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    As much as I hate to send you to Reddit, the r/personalfinance flowchart is hard to beat for most people. I’d recommend you start there to make sure you’re not overlooking something like your emergency fund.

    Reddit’s r/personalfinance flowchart for personal income

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        For the most part you can follow it. Pay down debts, save what you can, make a budget but it gets wonky when you hit 401K, IRA and healthcare

        Problem is each country in the EU is different. What works for Germany may not work for the Netherlands or Denmark.

        As an Aussie I substituted it’s and 401K with our pension equivalent called Superannuation. The healthcare is different in AU. Here in Europe it isn’t too different to AU, replace 401K and IRA are private pension or one offered through an employer.

      • IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I looked around a bit, and while I couldn’t find a drawn flowchart for the EU, r/EUpersonalfinance has a page on their wiki inspired by(links to it too) the US flowchart and accompanying text. I hate to plug reddit as well, but here is the link.

        spoiler

        https://www.reddit.com/r/eupersonalfinance/wiki/basics/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share#wiki_general_graphical_version

        (I’m not near a desktop, so can’t really copy and paste the info here with functional hyperlinks.)

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      hard to beat for most people.

      *Utterly irrelevant for most people

      Sorted that for you. What the hell is 401k, Roth, medical debt?

      • vzq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Financial advice will always be intrinsically linked to fiscal advice, and that will vary with jurisdiction. Where I live we have no 401k or medical debt, but we have other debt and investment instruments with preferential tax treatment.

        The main line of the flow chart is sound.

      • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Link is broken for me when I try opening it in a new tab. Something is up with imgur.

    • bamboo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Is there a reason to focus on 401k (beyond the employer match) before HSA? Isn’t HSA more tax savings advantageous, even if just limited to health care expenses?

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m not certain why they have HSA after 401k and IRA, but some possible things I can think of:

        • HSAs can be harder to take advantage of of the triple tax benefit if you’re retiring early (that is, still younger and healthier)
        • HSAs probably have worse investment options than an IRA
        • Allowing the user to optimize their Roth vs Traditional mix

        Again, I don’t really know because you’re right about the HSA triple tax advantage making it seem better than IRA or 401k, but I’m sure there was a reason given if you care to trawl the subreddit.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    20 hours ago

    It’s worth saving - investing (I assume you mean in the stock market/index/mutual fund) probably wouldn’t yield very significant growth but it is worth saving what you can.

    • benni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Why would the absolute amount of money matter for investing vs. saving cash? Assuming he finds a broker for which absolute transaction fees are negligible, the only important factors should be time window and risk tolerance, both of which are independent of the absolute saving rate.

    • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Investing accidently helped me save. If I have money in an account, and I need to use it, I will, but by buying stocks and bitcoin, I don’t have that money, I have things that will increase in value that I can sell for money. And there have been a few desperate times that I had to do that, but my brain is far more unlikely to take a hypothetical future loss, than spend all my money today.

  • ultranaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Yes. If you can afford it, dumping that money into an ETF like VT, VTI, or VOO every month for the next 10 years is very likely to result in you turning a profit. Start with a Roth IRA and don’t bother with a standard brokerage account until you’re able to max out the contribution limit. If you want to do anything more complicated than buy big low cost ETFs study up first and go slow.

  • Orbituary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yes. I started with 50/month using Autopilot to get in on the Pelosi investment portfolio. I am up 18% for the year.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Yes, saving is like a muscle you need to do it to get better with it. It’s far easier to turn 50/months into 200/month as your income grows, than starting at 200/month.

    • obstbert@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, finding some free ETF saving plan and investing 50 a month will give you some experience in investing. You can learn about, what’s an ETF, what’s diversification and how you react personally to seeing the number go up and down.

      One has to start somewhere.

  • 474D@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I just put extra money in a 5% high yield savings account. It’s not exciting, but there’s no risk and it will pay off over time

    • subtext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There’s also hardly any reward (comparatively speaking). Yields are crazy high right now on savings accounts, but they’re going to continue to drop, vs investing in the stock market (over the long term) is much more likely to maintain a much higher rate of return. Even at 5%, you’re really only getting about 2% growth since inflation is stuck at 3% right now. That compares to a long term average in the stock market of 7-9% after inflation.

      Not to say that OP should do that, necessarily. Especially if they haven’t built their emergency fund which is far more important than investing, until you have a safe amount.

      • 474D@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You’re probably right, as I’m not an expert, so thanks for your input. I am still worried of how the stock market will change with the upcoming trainwreck

        • subtext@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You gotta remember the time horizon, even with historically bad presidents in office, if you smooth the line of the stock market returns over 10, 20, or 30 years, it ends up looking like a really, really good as an investment opportunity. Especially if you’re into dollar cost averaging.

          Basically, if Trump tanks the stock market by going way overboard with things like tariffs, that would (at least looking at historical trends, I’m no financial expert or anything) make for a killer time to buy into the stock market because you’re getting stocks at a “discount.” Then when a different president / legislature comes into office, and if they turn around the economy, your investment would rise faster than otherwise expected.

          Again, you gotta do what’s right for you, this isn’t me saying you should absolutely invest or anything, especially if your basic needs aren’t met or your emergency savings aren’t at a good enough level to last 6–12 months unemployed. This is just how it has been for the last ~100 years.