I was able to watch all of those movies and shows on the Usenet tier of Netflix.
🏴☠️⛵🏴☠️
It really was nice while streaming lasted. Shame these companies continually allow greed to drive me back into the arms of piracy.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ piracy is better anyway, I want full bitrate digital copies not compressed garbage.
Such a shame high bitrate full quality movies/TV shows will semi fade away as these asshole companies only stream their movies at 7 gigs an hour and never release physical media.
40GB Pirates of the Caribbean just hits differently. The black pearl coming out of an actual mist and not layers of gray that slowly recede because of compression is very awesome. FullHD with proper bitrate is enough for my 2m projector image, too.
100% It boggles my mind that very apparent compression artifacts don’t bother the average consumer.
I guess if you don’t know what it is, you can’t realize it is a flaw.
The open, loving arms of the 7 seas.
If you stream torrented films from your computer to your TV you can get a much nicer bitrate
I remember when an older netflix ceo talked about never having ads on the platform, there was some high and mighty principle about it… But then money!
Is there a reason why people won’t buy blu rays?
You mean the technology Sony just discontinued?
Because a single movie costs like 3 months of ad-tier Netflix.
They’re not on ad-tier because they’re flushed with cash…
I would rather buy the movie and own it than pay netflix money.
Most movies aren’t worth owning
There defiantly is.
What?
That is not a proper response to what I said.
sorry, im confused.
You’re not part of the majority
Brand new, maybe. But second hand markets exist for this reason.
So does piracy, and it gives just as much money to the corporations who made the movie, if that’s something you’re worried about. And piracy don’t cost you shit.
Piracy is an option if they don’t care about the laws in their country, but some people care for one reason or another. The conversation was initially about about the cost of disc vs the cost of ad-supported streaming, so I offered a used option.
IF it exists in their country. It also requires enough people to buy the new ones first for it to be available for the second hand market.
True. But there are also libraries with some content that can be lent, and also the option that _cryptagion offered up.
Players can be expensive, but the most significant reason is probably having to get up and switch discs to watch something else. The vast majority of consumers have no idea how to rip a disc, nor the know-how required to set up a media server.
fair enough.
DVDs, people! DVDs and Blu-Rays!
I want a digital format that i can store locally. I think i’m forced to buy blu-rays and a blu-ray drive.
Buy the disc, then use Handbrake to digitize.
E: autocorrect
yes just need a blu ray drive for my laptop
You also need the right Bluray drive that can be re-flashed before you can extract the contents. If only it was as easy as DVDs.
ugh…i see
There are guides out there to do it or you can just buy one that’s already been flashed to bypass DRM. I bought one 5 or 6 years ago to do it and quit after maybe 10 Blu-rays because it takes forever if you want to compress via handbrake and it’s much easier just to torrent directly unless it’s something obscure.
Ah. Yes. Sorry. I missed that. I started with DVDs, since mine came with a reader. Haven’t moved to blu-ray, yet, for the same reason.
So far, BitTorrent hasn’t blocked anything for me.
The ads are really what get me. I’m fucking paying you and you still show me ads?!
I grew up with ads on cable, but I think it was back in the digg days someone said cable started that way too. You paid for cable for shows. Then the ads came. Streaming is almost exactly like cable now, except with the on demand part and how it’s over IP.
Yes
Ads were part of over the air but if you bought cable then you had none
Exactly right, it is the greediest model possible people will accept, ads+sub like cable TV and many popular streaming services became are the same garbage following the same enshittification path because art doesn’t exist in most TV and movies anymore, it’s just a commodity/product in a store.
I’m so tired of ads everywhere. I ad block at so many avenues. How do we crack an iPad to get rid of app ads? Is that possible?
If you set up a pihole, most of those in-game banner and popup ads won’t show up on iOS with the default blocklists. You won’t even be able to play ads for rewards anymore without disabling or swapping to a different network. Anything from the prime mobile store will still have ads unless you block the full Amazon domain, but those are the only ones I’ve encountered that are that persistent, and those are easy enough to avoid. Just don’t download anything from Amazon.
As a bonus, the pihole will also block ads across the rest of your network, and you can choose to be really aggressive with what gets blocked if you want, so you don’t need the piecemeal per-device solutions.
If you do opt to set a pihole up, make sure to port forward 53 to the pihole, so android users get the same Adblock perk (android will default to google dns via 53 to serve up ads without that port forward)
If you then set up a home VPN through your router, you can connect back to it when you are out and about and get the same level of ad protection wherever you go.
It is also possible to block ads using some VPNs. But in general, if you want the freedom to modify things, you should not be using Apple products.
I typically don’t but I have an iPad from being in aviation and gave it to my little one. The app ForeFlight isn’t available on Android. They have a Garmin one but it just isn’t the same.
I use this on iOS and iPadOS. It isn’t perfect and needs tinkering and tweaking. But it does block ads systemwide in most apps (banner ads, not those pesky in game ads usually). And you can customise it by seeing what ad servers were called, and add them to the block list.
Pi-hole network is probably the easiest approcah
Wouldn’t an ad-blocking DNS work just as well?
That’s literally what a pi-hole is.
No, they mean setting your DNS to an already existing ad blocking DNS. You do not need a oi hole to do that. See option 2 here https://adguard-dns.io/en/public-dns.html
I do this on my router and phone. It doesn’t block everything, sure, but it blocks more than you’d think. And I didn’t have to fiddle with a raspberry Pi.
Anyone know of a way to buy movies that doesn’t include a bluray?
buyfindI am trying to avoid doing that if i can.
Buy the DVD/Blueray then download the torrent.
You’ve paid for the media, there’s nothing wrong with having it in a format you can use.
The law in many countries disagrees with us on this, so be careful when you exercise your ownership rights.
That’s true. I just wish there was a way to buy the movies digitally.
There are
Steam, Google, Amazon, and Sony all sell movies digitally (I don’t know if Amazon still does since they switched to streaming)
But go into it knowing there’s DRM to prevent back ups and they can remove the content from your library at any time
You’re not buying the movie. You’re buying a license to watch it on that platform.
Might as well just call it an extended rental.
Most of the stuff you see while scrolling through Amazon’s streaming service is actually just stuff you can buy but not stream. If it’s not one of their own big exclusives, the service is almost unusable
Example
Devil’s Advocate here, but I wonder if that could be a choice made by the creatives or the production company - like, “we hate advertising and don’t want it shown during our show, so that’s the kind of licence we will agree to”.
I think a lot of people would applaud that sentiment of refusing to have ads in their show.
Unfortunately the result would be that for noble, purity of the art, reasons they end up accidentally screwing people in your situation.
No idea if that’s plausible, but maybe?
As the article states, this applies to Netflix originals too so I don’t know how true this is.
Yeah, I feel like there is a lot at play even in terms of how the content is paid for. Maybe netflix only gets the ad money and not the creatives, in which case they don’t want their content on the ad version. Either way, the customer suffers.
So not a real loss in this specific case.
I don’t really know why I still have a netflix subscription
Inertia.
What’s this skull and cross bones flag doing here??? Oh, right. It’s mine. I fly it often…
TIL theres a good place to get free goodies
!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com (inaccessible for lemmy.world users)
Sonofabitch it didn’t used to be blocked for .world. I really need to switch, ugh.
World admins seem shitty, they’re also banned discussion of jury nullification.
They changed the policy to only be against discussion of jury nullification when talking about a future crime i.e. a crime that hasn’t been committed yet. Still not acceptable.
Got any suggestions for another instance that doesn’t block much? (Or isn’t blocked much, I don’t know what’s happening.)
I’m at lemmy.dbzer0.com - run by an anarchist but you don’t have to be an anarchist to join, this instance is pro-piracy, and the instace where !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com is hosted. Only spam instances and lemmygrad is blocked, but hexbear isn’t blocked
sopuli.xyz - run by a Finnish person - blocks both lemmygrad and hexbear, and spam instances
lemmy.ca - run by Canadians? (I think?) - also blocks both lemmygrad and hexbear, and spam instances
sh.itjust.works - this one seems like the only one that has no application
the last time I checkedI just checked and theres no application - also blocks lemmygrad and hexbear, and spam instanceslemmy.sdf.org - has zero blocks, so they federate with spam instances and possibly illegal content (CSAM) from other instances
lemm.ee - federates with all except 3: (threads.net) (lemmy.burger.rodeo) (burggit.moe)
Edit: I actually am worried about the instances that have low or zero blocks, there are CSAM everywhere, its kinda risky to federate with all.
Mander.xyz has great science content and very sensible policies. But for a more general purpose instance, those above.
While I don’t think this is a news channel, I cannot condemn any rage against the machine.
It’s a licensing issue. They don’t have the rights to show every movie or show ad supported.
It’s greed issue.
Do you have a source for that? Because some of them are Netflix originals.
For one you can read the article. But it’s a long standing thing. When you license a film or show for streaming, you don’t inherently get the right to show ads during it. Some studios specifically exclude the right, some charge more, some don’t care. The deals made for some of the Netflix originals don’t even allow it, so they can’t show their “own” shows with ads. The reality is often times streaming services aren’t even making their original shows, they’re just paying a bunch of money for exclusive distribution in one or more markets. So, older deals especially, Netflix didn’t negotiate for ad rights because they weren’t showing ads back then. Some production companies don’t want ads running during their prestige show.
they could just show those few titles without ads on the ‘ad supported’ plan. i dunno. that might make too much sense.
Netflix originals.
“Netflix Originals” are content that is produced, co-produced, or distributed exclusively by Netflix. Note that last type. Anything they have exclusive distribution rights for can be labeled an original, even things they didn’t make.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_Netflix_exclusive_international_distribution_programming
