• bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    19 days ago

    10% false positives is an enormous rate given how Police like to ‘find’ evidence and ‘elicit’ confessions.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      19 days ago

      It isn’t predicting individual crimes, just pattern recognition and extrapolation like how the weather is predicted.

      “There are on average 4 shootings in November in this general area so there probably will be 4 again this year.” is the kind of prediction that AI is making.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        So they are using it to try and decide on deployment?

        If that is all they’re using it for I guess it isn’t too bad. As long as it isn’t accusing individuals of planning to commit a crime with a zero evidence.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          18 days ago

          It is probably going to be used to justify the disproportionate police attention paid to minority communities and to justify activities similar to stop and frisk.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 days ago

            The thing is don’t they already have crime stats? Presumably they’re already using them as justification so this won’t change much.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 days ago

      That’s in a punitive system. Used in a transformative/preventive manner (which it will not), this can actually save lives and help people in need

    • 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      18 days ago

      AI is AI. not all AI is AGI, but stable diffusion, LLMs and all the other ones are real AI. the only reason people disagree is because they watched too much sci-fi and think that AI is supposed to be sentient or whatever. hell, even the code controlling the creepers in Minecraft is called AI. in the game. you can spawn a creeper with the noai flag and it’ll make it so the creeper doesn’t do anything. quite a silly take to say it’s not ai just because you don’t like it. there’s many things to dislike about the modern state of AI, your argument is just shooting yourself in the foot.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yeah! Real AI is expert systems and fuzzy logic! Generative AI’s capabilities and intelligence fail in comparison to Fuji Electric’s advanced temperature control systems!

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 days ago

    If crime is that predictable, that would mean crime is isn’t caused by people’s choices but something else… like say mental illness, poverty, hunger, lack of social supports and that lots of cops locking up people in prisons as a deterrent won’t work to reduce crime… hmmm wait a second…

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    I mean you can train ai to look for really early signs of multiple diseases. It can predict the future, sort of

  • kubica@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 days ago

    Hey could you just scan me before I continue putting effort in earning money?