• irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Why TF does it matter so much if you cheat in a single player game that they have to take such drastic measures to prevent it? In multiplayer, competitive games, I sort of get it, depending on context, but single player games, no way. I mod single player games all the time. It’s one of the main reasons I like PC gaming over console. I’d never buy a game that went this far to prevent something that has no effect on them or anyone else.

    • Starbuncle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Lots of game developers started off as hobbyist modders when they were young. Maybe they’re trying to eliminate the future competition. More likely, Denuvo’s actual primary purpose is DRM and anti-cheat is just how it’s sold to players.

  • localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    I love them paying for a denuvo license on a game no one even cares enough about to pirate anyway.

    Ubisoft may have given up making entertaining games a long time ago but they still provide me with entertainment.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Search for ubisoft in steams store page, click the gear on the right hand side, click ignore to take out the trash.

    There had always been more then one lifetimes worth of stuff to do. Be picky

  • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    18 hours ago

    All you have to do to get my money is let me be a pirate, a jedi, a ninja, or a samurai. My inner child can’t help themselves.

    So how can Ubisoft be so terrible that I have literally not wanted to play their Pirate game, their StarWars game, and now their Ninja/Samurai game!?

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think that’s really the issue with Ubisoft, they just don’t make “must play” games anymore. Seriously, what’s the last universally liked Ubisoft game that everyone wanted to play? Far Cry 3. Close second is probably AC: Black flag but that was already suffering from AC fatigue and its critical acclaim has come retroactively. Those games are over a decade old. Ubisoft hasn’t released anything in the last decade where the mainstream gaming goes “We must play that”. Ubisoft simply doesn’t make exciting games anymore. They make games that are for everyone which also means they’re for no-one.

    • deeves@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Hey now! Ubisoft is still enabling your desire to become a pirate! Just … In a different way than they wanted.

  • NONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Can’t they just… Make a “normal game”? One that you install, play and that’s it?. Why the fuck do they need to monitor Ram? What the hell?

    • KeenFlame@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Anti cheat (it’s actually anti piracy which is not possible also they oops sell massive data dumps for cash oops)

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Ah, it’s in the article.

        To top it all off, Shadows’ EULA also includes a provision that allows the game to monitor your PC’s RAM to ensure you’re not running any unauthorized programs like macros, cheats, or hacks, a well-intentioned clause that nonetheless feels a touch out of place in a single-player game and could potentially scare off some of the more suspicious players who aren’t comfortable with their hardware being monitored.

        • UpperBroccoli
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          6 hours ago

          unauthorized programs

          No one gets to authorize programs to run on my PC but me.

    • Keegen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Companies realized they can sell cheats as microtransactions instead and people will pay for them. They will likely also include some cosmetic microtransactions like their previous game, which they definitely don’t want people just cheating in. It’s why so many single player games require being always online as well.

  • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Imagine if they took all that ‘piracy prevention’ effort (that doesn’t really work in the end anyway) and put it towards actually making enjoyable games.

  • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can we do something like reporting Denuvo or the kernel anticheats as malware in Windows defender?

    A game with a built in system lever logger that could theoretically monitor even your bank transactions should be reported as spyware/malware and users installing it should have to expressly acknowledge / authorise this.