• UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    With a more representative electoral system, we could have more then two buttons. First-past-the-post voting is mathematically flawed and will always result in a two party system, which is why we must replace it as soon as we can.

    Yall believe in democracy right?

        • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          That has nothing to do with this. That’s the interstate popular vote compact and all it does is make the winner of the popular vote the winner of the election. It does absolutely nothing to end two party dominance, and continues all of the exact same flaws of the existing system but without the electoral college, and even that only in the unlikely event that the compact survives the inevitable challenge in the supreme court. You still only get one vote for one candidate and it comes necessarily at the expense of any others.

          • DogWater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            You’re right I spose, but It’s the first step. Every time the ec elected a Republican in the last 25 years, a dem won the popular vote.

            Once Dems actually start winning, Then you have the ability to make changes. There are already states that have implemented ranked choice voting.

            • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 days ago

              I mean, winning isn’t the last step. The democrats are more likely to implement anything meaningful than the republicans, but we’re still going to have to drag them kicking and screaming into doing it. If everyone breathes a sigh of relief and relaxes on November 7th nothing will change. The real work STARTS then.

    • florencia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      First past the post voting is the cheapest and fastest use of taxpayer dollars. Must we overburden our poorest districts with purchasing requirements for fancy smancy vote counting machines? /s

      • dandelion
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        21 days ago

        In fact, this whole elections thing is just so expensive, a burdensome cost to the people. Wouldn’t you prefer to save money and enjoy the reduced risk with knowing a qualified expert is running things (\s)

        (this legit is how the Heritage Foundation sounds)

  • andros_rex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    22 days ago

    I might not leave the country, but I’ll have to leave my state. I wonder if next Friday after work I’ll need to load up everything I can fit in my car and drive as far north as possible. It’s terrifying that my rights as a transgender human vanish will vanish overnight where I live. I’ve heard of bounties in Odessa.

    Knowing that most of the people I live and work around are happily voting for a child rapist has broken my brain. The folks protesting at the Planned Parenthood (abortion is already illegal here) are going to vote for a man that’s probably paid for multiple abortions. It’s a sickness I can’t fathom.

    • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 days ago

      Its sickening what is happening to this country, that you even feel the need to flee in such a way, but it is a realistic concern. There are people who very much want carte blanche to harm trans people, and if Trump is elected they may get that cover, its vile.

    • gi1242@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 days ago

      fully agree. hope you don’t have to move… but for some miraculous incomprehensible reason the race is a statistical tie

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s optimistic of you to assume we’ll know the outcome by next Friday. Republicans are going to turn the whole election into a circus if they possibly can.

    • Karjalan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      I don’t understand how there are undecided voters this election… I understand trump voters. Ride or die republicans, bigots, wealthy people that want more money for themselves. They are fucked up, but they make sense.

      But how are you undecided? What are you weighing up. If you’re not in the aforementioned groups, what single positive thing does trump offer?

      • stochasticity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        22 days ago

        I’ve seen some people try the free speech angle. But that isn’t true either. Neither he nor Elon are actually about free speech.

        • Karjalan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          22 days ago

          No, they’re inherently more anti free speech than the people they’re puroportedly against, anyone using that justification is either ignorant or only cares about not getting in trouble for being a bigot

        • Lightor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Right? How can that be said with a straight face with all these “woke” book bans. And then Trump saying he wants to arrest the media for saying bad things about him.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 days ago

        Undecided voters aren’t undecided because they’re oblivious to what’s going on. They’re undecided because they live in a swing state, so they have more power than the average voter, and most importantly they want something. They see the candidates campaigning specifically for them. They’re hoping to be offered a promise they actually care about.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          And yet the things wanted are being pretty directly ignored to hopefully find other no voters in swing states and rag them out to vote.

          It’s been a pretty obvious back and forth of requests and then ignoring them and trying to offer something else. I don’t know how people are confused about what is happening.

      • InputZero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 days ago

        The only reason I can actually understand an undecided voter is if it’s actually a strategic decision to entice the parties to give them more. An undecided voter is worth so much that Elon is literally giving away millions of dollars to sway them. Yeah it’s chump change to him but it’s still unprecedented. It would be kind of like a nullifying jurur, in that they’re saying something completely different than what they’re thinking. That totally gives undecided voters way more credit than they’re actually due, because in reality they’re just ignorant of the situation.

        • slampisko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          22 days ago

          Both parties would still support the Israeli government.

          Exactly, and Trump is so much worse in everything else, not to mention that he’d also be worse in the very Palestinian issue you’re concerned about! Even with this issue in the equation I still don’t understand it

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            Well, I’m not American so I cannot feel the existential dilemma between picking a genocider or ride or die genocider. But if I am electing, I certainly don’t want to feel being forced to pick either two. I imagine many Americans probably feel uncomfortable with that as well.

            Additionally, another factor with Trump still polling remarkably well is because a lot of people perceive the economy under Trump to be better. Take it as you will, but people under economic pressure feel forced to pick the extreme. People typically value economic security over liberty, unfortunately.

            • slampisko@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              Yeah, the ingrained illusion that Republicans are better for the economy is a very unfortunate one

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      in the states it’s so easy. you just choose between the status quo or the obvious deranged evil. here we vote on the lower positions and nobody ever knows who any of them are and we don’t have proportional so everyone just votes by party and the names are largely meaningless

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    21 days ago

    My Mexican immigrant coworker believes that if Kamala gets elected that immigrants will be deported but also immigrants are getting too much free money and food stamps and things like that. He really has bought into some kind of weird belief that Donald Trump is a better candidate. He can’t vote because he’s not a citizen. I think he’s just pissed off because he works two jobs and sees people who get free stuff and don’t come here legally as lazy.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      The electoral college picks the president. Not you. You’re a “migrant” labeled “citizen”. You can influence the election if you happen to walk by an actual elector and get a chance to talk to him… Tell him about your student loans, your fear of putin, the homeless, you two jobs just to pay the mortgage, etc. they’ll understand and vote the way you would vote if you were an actual elector… don’t you worry migrant!

      Yey! Democracy!

  • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    20 days ago

    A perfectly good meme but I would say it might still presume a little too much good faith.

    They’re not undecided. They want to vote for Trump and are desperately hoping for a socially acceptable reason to do so.

    • UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      21 days ago

      Don’t know why you’re being downvoted, Harris isn’t perfect but with Trump on the other side not much is required of her to be the best option.

      • peppers_ghost@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        21 days ago

        I’ll go as far to say she’s a huge piece of shit that smells less bad than trump but you’re still working with a turd

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 days ago

      Is it a spot if you grab someone who isn’t your favorite wife by the pussy?

      How do you grab your own wife by the pussy? Like do you just go for it over whatever she’s wearing? Do you pull down her panties to actually grab her by the vagina?

      What’s the proper vagina grab? Like do you apply pressure upwards and pull …nah that would slip easy! It’s a vagina, it’s got slime on it if you get near it. Nah. I think the best and most proper way is to insert one or more fingers into the vagina so you can pull.

      I hope our president can tell us how to properly and legally grab women by the vagina. Maybe it will be a national sport one day… imagine a team of say 6 couples on each side, the get arranged like in football, except that they must be copulating. The goal is to walk around the field…full of couches and rugs and Lego bricks from the kids … And grab one of the opposite team’s women by the pussy. Each couple who’s woman gets grabbed by the pussy is automatically disqualified and has to exit the field. Extra points during sudden death if you can doggy or spit roast the guy.

      Thank God Trump figured out how to grab them all by the pussy for us all. Right? 👍

  • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I’m going to go out on a pretty long limb here and suggest the possibly that they’re not actually undecided at all.

    • pezhore@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      22 days ago

      I’ve read (not sure how true) that it’s not necessarily undecided between Harris and Trump - more undecided about even showing up to vote.

      I honestly don’t know what’s worse.

    • ManixT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      It shouldn’t be, but I feel like this is such a delicate thing.

      Like, Trump is obviously racist, but his base sees themselves in him and when he is labeled racist, it projects to them; they’re labeled racist too. They “know” they aren’t racist and it’s a strong accusatory word along the lines of being called a pedophile and that instantly brings up defenses and basically kills any chance of swaying their opinion. Besides, if we were wrong calling “them” (their projection from trump) racist, how could we possibly be right about calling Trump racist?

      Should we give a shit what these people think? Really wish we didn’t have to, but the world isn’t fair and just enough at the moment to disregard the nuance here.

  • multifariace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    20 days ago

    Apparently putting a huge number of people in jail for minor possession of a drug that is only illegal because of racist 70s politics is spotless, and doing so to support capitalizing the prison system, is spotless. I call it dehumanizing and unconstitutional, but I just care about empirical data that apparently is completely unimportant in tribalist capitalist worshiping countries like the USA.

    • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      I don’t count “spotless prosecutorial record” as a win, but given the two viable choices I’ll take it over “shockingly successful fascist demagogue” every time, and twice on Sundays.

      • chaonaut@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        I holding my finger over the button as long as possible in the hope that the button that the “spotless prosecutorial record” will suddenly add the “stop abetting a genocide” portion we’ve been asking for since before they changed out the previous button, but I guess I’ll be going for the option that isn’t currently telling me how my existence is threatening to them and hope that they’ll follow through on valuing human life this time around.

    • Zetta@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 days ago

      Agree on your points, I honestly fucking hate cops and by extension prosecutors that enable and collude with them. However the only other option is worse than a pig.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      Countless was a little under 2000 people (at least as far as Harris is concerned) That’s about half of what her predecessor in the same office did over roughly the same time period.

      Now, that conviction is for “possession, sale, or cultivation”. Most paid a fine rather than serve jail time. We also don’t know the exact breakdown of possession vs sale vs cultivation.

      We also know that Harris pushed for decriminalization and legalization in California, and has pushed some of the same as vice president. I think Joe is the roadblock there, even if he was convinced to pardon a bunch of people for simple possession.

  • ceoofanarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    22 days ago

    Ignoring everything else here prosecutor is a net negative and “Felon” isn’t a bad thing necessarily. If you want to you can criticize Trump without propping up law enforcement.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    22 days ago

    He’s not a Nazi; he’s a fascist. Nazi refers to a specific political party. Fascist is more general.

      • Drusas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        22 days ago

        Oh, I’m not saying he’s any better than a Nazi. Just being pedantic.

    • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      The main difference, as I understand, is that national socialism is inherently racist and puts the (Aryan) race on top of the ideology, everything else must submit to the benefit of the (Aryan) race, whereas fascism puts the benefit of the state on top.

      https://historyplex.com/difference-between-fascism-nazism

      Trump, as far as I can judge from beyond the pond, is still claiming to put the state, or the United States of America, first, like a fascist would do. His hate speech against immigrants still serves the narrative of them being bad for the US, not of them being disadvantageous towards the benefit of the Aryan race.

    • lemonmelon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      No, the term "Nazi Party"refers to the National Socialist German Workers’ Party. The term “Nazi” refers to an adherent to the ideology of Hitler Fascism. The NSDAP didn’t typically refer to themselves with that term.

      There’s also a square/rectangle situation in play: all Nazis are fascists but not all fascists are Nazis. In this case, though, he’s more on the square side of the comparison. The biggest departures from the ideology are the inclusion of religion and the lack of Lebensraum (at least at home; there’s an ironic argument to be made about how his belief that Bibi is moving too slowly in Gaza indicates that he has an eye towards creating living-space for certain groups at the expense of others).