• fireshell@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    it’s a pity that politics is penetrating more and more into open source and FOSS.

    recently support for Russian cloud providers was cut out of opentofu. https://github.com/opentofu/registry/pull/824

    now this. this is, of course, natural the core and many components of modern distributions have not been free in terms of decision-making for a long time and are under the influence of large companies, which in turn are under the influence of the USA.

  • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Dude, WHAT. This is totally against what Linux and Open source in general stand for.

    I don’t support the thing that I’m sure was their reason for this but I definitely don’t support banning someone from contributing to an open system solely off nationality.

    So what eventually only the “good guys” can contribute to and use open source software? Who exactly decides who the “good guys” are in this scenario? USA? China?

    The implications of what this can cause in the future for potentially all of the open source community is absolutely sad. We should welcome all our fellow human beings to contributing to open source.

    • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      Yeah, being from Russia is a lot different from being associated with the Russian government. If the maintainers are in the latter, then yeah fuck em, but if they live in Russia with no realistic way of getting out and they’re just trying to live a normal life removed from the bullshit and write code as an intellectual escape? And you take that away from them? Precisely how you radicalize people

    • digdilem@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      As far as I can read from that, they’re still maintainers, just have had their credit removed from the contributors page, no?

      Still a strange thing to do and I look forwards to an explanation.

    • Norah - She/They
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Reminds me of a comment the other day on a post about Ventoy. Whatever the situation there is, which definitely needs clarification still, the person was saying that you shouldn’t trust it at all because the maintainer is Chinese, even though he has emigrated away. Because the CCP will be able to leverage his family still there to force him to create a backdoor.

      That’s just thinly veiled racism in my opinion.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        That’s plain racism honestly.

        I knew a (asian) guy who was working for a government contractor serving the US military. The racism is very serious to say the least. He got framed when something went down and was almost tried with treason. (that carries the death penalty) The authorities hit him with questions about his loyalty to the US for 5 hours even though he grew up in the US and so did his parents.

  • JTskulk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My first thought is that this was to make Linux palatable to western regulations, like how companies can’t use Kaspersky anymore. Stupid if I’m right because it’s not like the fsb is going to sneak spyware into Linux.

  • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m definitely all for Ukraine winning, but this is bullshit, basically the red scare all over again (but for tech).

  • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Couldn’t think of a more lemmy thread topic than one involving both Russian geopolitics and linux.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Couldn’t think of a more lemmy thread topic than one involving both Russian geopolitics and linux.

      part of me is sad that there aren’t many .worlders defending blocking those evil tankies. lol

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Gotta have them “various compliance requirements”, man, gotta have’em. Don’t ask me what they are, but damnit, gotta have’em.

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Hello Internet commenters. Please remember that there’s no rule that says you need to tell us all your gut reaction to this if you know absolutely nothing about the situation.

    • Kajika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 hours ago

      knowing nothing about the situation is indeed the problem. if only this process was more transparent…

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Being Russian => banned from doing business with the rest of the world

        That’s pretty straight forward to me.

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Western chauvinism:

          the imperial core == the rest of the world

          You may not have noticed that most of the world is ignoring the international rules-based order’s sanctions. And not only almost all of the Global South, which represents ~85% of the world’s people and the bulk of the world’s production* and natural resources. Even many Global North countries are skirting their own sanctions to trade with Russia.

          The Global North is largely sanctioning itself, and Europe is paying a very high price for it. In particular high energy prices, which is eroding their industrial base even more.


          *Since the Global North in its infinite wisdom de-industrialized itself.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            The almost the entire world is against Russia. And I don’t see China coming to Russia’s aid any time soon.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You’re just making it worse 😂 You really have no idea what’s going on in the real world outside of the imperial core, and you’re really sure you do.

                • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  Sure, but that vote hasn’t actually done anything, and countries continue to trade with Russia. And the Global South countries haven’t curtailed their relations with Russia one whit. In fact some are building even deeper ties with Russia. They’re building an alternative system to SWIFT, they’re trading in each others’ currencies to avoid the dollar, and they’re making plans for some kind of BANCOR-like currency. The BRICS summit is happening right now, hosted by Russia.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I have seen pictures of Linus Torvads so I feel that I am uniquely qualified to explain whats going on. Let me break it down for you.

      The Linux Kernel is meeting compliance requirements by removing Russian maintainers.

      Thank you all and have a good night.

      • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The problem is they aren’t even saying what those requirements are even after numerous inquiries about it.

        Don’t you think its wrong to ban someone only because of their nationality? I mean for real man. Every country in the world has done some fucked up shit but open source software is supposed to go beyond politics and ideologies.

        They weren’t doing anything malicious it was wrong to remove them.

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t agree with communists either but open source software is supposed to be about more than that

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It is a tricky topic that is hard to get right. For instance the CoreJS dev is Russian and he is maintaining a library that is depended on by a large number of counties.

        In general I support any action to further distance Russia but I can understand how the Russian maintainers feel. After all they may or may not support Russia.

        The likely cause of this was the fact that it looks bad on paper for Linux to have Russian involvement. After all that’s where all the “hackers” live. Somehow I think this was probably in response to a threat behind closed doors.

        I also would be concerned about counties trying to compromise foss but unfortunately that is just as likely to come from the US as it is from Russia.

    • secret300@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I agree to this. I was literally just in the shower thinking how Linux, the space station, and the Olympics are the only times we as humans come together to collaborate

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Does invading your neighbor count as international collaboration? Not that all Russian people can be held directly responsible for the actions of their government.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Aside from the fact that it’s pretty insane to suggest to kick someone off a project for no reason other than their nationality (the article doesn’t say any of these maintainers supported the invasion or had any ties with the government), even if these people actively supported the government, as far as kernel development is concerned… I don’t really care? If their contributions are good then I want their patches to be merged. Tor was made by the US government, which I in no way condone, but I still use Tor.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Russia literally invaded everyone around them. Look at all the former USSR counties.

          The US has been involved in a lot of places but that’s not a justification for Russia attacking its neighborhood.

          • azuth@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            27 minutes ago

            Does Russia invading Ukraine justify the US invading Iraq?

            Though we are discussing individuals here, should we ban Americans in projects to maintain moral integrity?

            BTW are you referring to historical (pre 1990) expansion as well? Because an American really shouldn’t want to go there.

          • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            27 million Soviets died liberating these people from the Nazis, and this is the thanks they get.

      • lily33@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I’m sure removing these maintainers would be of great help to the Ukrainian war effort…

        More seriously: We need to help Ukraine more. But this doesn’t do that. It just hurts a bunch of people (both the maintainers, and the people using their code) for no benefit whatsoever.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The biggest help the west could’ve done for Ukraine was to fuck off when the Istanbul negotiations were happening two months into the war.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I think the general idea is to create as much drain on Russia as possible. Limit there ability to import and export good while creating brain drain and terrible moral.

          How many Russians have defected at this point? Spoiler is a decent amount.

        • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          100% agree with you! Like I said, I don’t think we can hold all Russian people directly responsible for the actions of their government.

          I wish for an ideal world where politics could stay out of Linux, but this is extremely tricky and cannot be treated black and white. Labeling things as “political” and then crying to keep “politics” out of things is often used as a weapon for exclusion, for example by sexuality or race, and I think exclusion should be anathema for Linux and open source projects.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 hours ago

      “propaganda”? Oh. You mean like Russia started a full blown unprovoked war with a peaceful nation? That “propaganda”?

      Sucks others got caught in the crosshairs, but that’s just what happens when your authoritarian government launches unprovoked wars and gets sanctioned.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        No matter how many times Western states and corporate media insist that it wasn’t provoked won’t change the fact that it was[1][2].

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 hours ago
          1. NATO Expansion: The argument that NATO’s eastward expansion “provoked” Russia is often linked to Gorbachev’s 1990 talks with Western leaders. However, this promise was tied to Germany’s unification, not a blanket prohibition on expansion. And importantly eastern european countries sought NATO membership because of their historical (and justified) fears of Russian imperialism (a dynamic Marxists should understand as nations seeking sovereignty free from external dominance.)

          2. Western Involvement in Ukraine: The U.S. supporting a regime change in Ukraine in 2014 is thought to be imperialism. But ignores the agency of Ukrainians, who led the Maidan protests because of already existing deep dissatisfaction with Yanukovych’s corrupt, oligarchic regime and his pivot to Russia. Supporting popular uprisings against oligarchs should align with Marxist values even if “the West” has its own interests

          3. The Role of Fascism in Ukraine: Yes, Ukraine has issues with far-right groups like so many countries but exaggerating their influence as a justification for invasion serves to divert attention from Russia’s own reactionary politics. Far-right elements in Ukraine do not define the country’s political landscape, nor do they justify imperial aggression from another state. Russia has its own history of fostering right-wing authoritarianism.

          4. Minsk Agreements: While the West" and Ukraine could be criticized for their handling of the Minsk agreements, Russia also violated these accords by continuing support for the separatists. Both sides share blame for the failure of Minsk, but it doesn’t make Russia’s invasion justified. Ukrainians didn’t provoke a full-scale invasion; they were defending their sovereignty.

          5. NATO as a “Defensive” Alliance: Criticism of NATO’s imperialistic behavior is fair its actions in places like Libya show it isn’t 100% defensive. But in this case, NATO’s expansion was driven by countries seeking security from a historically imperialist power. Ukraine wasn’t “provoking” Russia by wanting self-determination; it was trying to secure its future.

          You’re trying to push this “Actuall, but Ukraine DID provoke” narrative by mixing in unverified, ideologically biased material with references that are legitimate, but isolated incidents. Like linking far-right activity to justify the war conveniently ignores Russia’s (I should probably say everyone’s) own far-right issues. Marxists should reject imperialism in all its forms, including Russia’s actions in Ukraine.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Greg sent out the patch but won’t respond to mail list questions. Sad to see Linux leadership bend the knee

    • BobGnarley@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Dude seriously and I can’t believe how many people don’t seem to see how sad that is in this thread.

      Even if you hate this country or that, not even responding about it and keeping the code and using it anyway and only removing the attribution to the maintainers they removed (although that will escalate to banning them altogether I imagine this seems like a step one kind of thing) is just salt on the wound .

      Super sad shit honestly.