“Whether you hate me, like me or are indifferent, do you want the best car, or do you not want the best car?” [Apartheid Manchild] told audiences at an event in November.

Well, for starters I don’t want a car at all. I’d rather use public transit. You know, an actually effective means of reducing emissions.

If I were in the market, yes, I would want the best car. Which is why I’d never buy a Tesla. I’d buy an XPeng or a BYD or the like.

  • EldritchFeminity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    5 days ago

    The Muskrat is the reason why I can’t even feel good about anything SpaceX does. Every time they do something to propel space exploration forward, all I can think about is how he and his cronies are going to use it to privatize space for profits.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The alternative needed to be NASA, slow, methodical, maximum safety, maximum consideration, with patents benefiting society instead of a private class of shareholders who see it as just another gift in their portfolio.

      Instead, we gave away the future to reckless profiteers, and starved the correct, societal scale project of growing beyond our world that could have provided a sense of common purpose and accomplishment as Mercury and Apollo did, which given we’re at each other’s throats would have been useful.

      We won’t get anywhere with people like Musk or any other avarice obsessed profiteer at the wheel, only heartbreak in trusting human lives to them as they cut corners and overpromise their capability.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        5 days ago

        Blame the Boomers on this one. They got the moon landing as kids and then thought the rest was boring so they cut funding once they made up a large part of Congress in the mid 80s.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 days ago

        FWIW spacex doesn’t actually have a lot of patents for their ships. Patents mean making things public but hold society back for the duration of the patent.

        SpaceX treats it’s rocket stuff as trade secrets so countries like China that don’t respect patents can’t use it. However, if someone does figure it out on their own, SpaceX has no protections.

    • rezifon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 days ago

      Every time they do something to propel space exploration forward. . .

      Musk is trying to build the Dune future, not the Star Trek future

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          The thing about Elysium is that if they created it with modern tech itd be somewhat trivial for a resistance group to starve out the ones in space at least. Just a recoilless rifle with a targeting computer probably running Linux mounted to the back of a Toyota hilux would be more than enough.

          • Rolando@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            That might work once or twice, but I suspect the rich would just launch their supplies from an island, or from a very large “Green Zone.” But I’m guessing the space station would be very susceptible to sabotage or a suicide attack, or something.

    • Nurgus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 days ago

      Every time i hear about SpaceX, I wonder how much further along we’d be if we had proper taxes and gave the money to NASA/ESA. Even if the answer is “about the same” then at least they treat their engineers well.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Every dollar SpaceX spends, NASA gets it done with a fraction of the budget. The James Webb took forever but it was worth it. SpaceX would have trashed it for a tax write off.

  • VantaBrandon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    5 days ago

    They used fake robots at their latest event. They were secretly controller by humans. Tesla is a scam company.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    5 days ago

    Friend ran afoul of the Tesla’s Drive-By-Wire. She had her car on automatic drive and it was speeding towards the bumper of another vehicle. She slammed on the brakes, but because the system has to switch from automatic to manual, the brakes didn’t engage for a critical second. So she ended up jamming her car into the rear end of the vehicle in front of her, and her system recorded the event as “human error”, because she was at the wheel when the collision occurred.

    Now she’s out several grand in repairs that her insurance won’t cover, because she failed to let Tesla’s autodrive system take responsibility for the collusion by trying to prevent it.

    Stories like this are what make me incredibly hesitant to buy a Tesla.

    • SoleInvictus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 days ago

      As someone who owns a Tesla, I can attest this isn’t how the brakes work. We’d heard similar rumors to this effect and it was the first thing we tried on the test drive. The brakes are 100% functional 100% of the time, regardless of driving assist.

      Even if “full self driving” (quotes intentional, that shit is not fully self driving) did cause an accident, the driver is perfectly capable of avoiding it by braking or taking over steering.

      P.s. Fuck Elon Musk

      • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Is that true for all Tesla models though? I was under the impression the newer models had blended braking, which would make this story somewhat plausible.

        • SoleInvictus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          To the best of my knowledge, which includes a few minutes online trying to prove myself wrong, the brakes on all Tesla models are straight friction - no blending. Regenerative braking only happens when the accelerator is released. The friction brakes alone are sufficient to kick in ABS, so regen isn’t needed to help stop the car.

          After giving it some thought, I suspect the car wasn’t stopping fast enough, so the driver took over and just didn’t brake hard enough to prevent the accident (possibly because they were anticipating some amount of assist from regenerative braking). Underestimating how hard to brake is very common and is one of the primary reasons behind adding automatic braking systems.

    • thisorthatorwhatever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      switch from automatic to manual

      This had me confused for a second, as these are types of transmissions. Wouldn’t ‘A.I.to human’ driving be a more accurate description?

    • Oascany@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      As other commenters have said, this is just not how the system works. Something was misunderstood or some context was probably lost somewhere. I have driven a new-ish 2021 Model 3 as a daily, and there are basically 2 modes of auto driving. One is autopilot, which is very similar to adaptive cruise control with lane-keep assist in other cars. Then there’s full self-driving, which is supposed to be you entering a destination and your car will take you there with minimal interference. You also need to pay out the wazoo for that FSD functionality. Tesla needs you to be vigilant in both cases, and you’re responsible for a crash in both cases. Now onto the brakes, in either system, when you press the brakes, the car immediately applies brakes. On occasion, it’s taken the automated driving system a second to shut off when I apply the brakes, but I have always felt the brakes immediately kick in. Teslas at the moment do not have brake-by-wire. They have throttle-by-wire (duh, EVs), and steer-by-wire on some of the more recent higher end models. All of them have a hydraulic braking system where your foot on the pedal is immediately converted to braking pressure. Your friend is mistaken, and the crash is their responsibility for not maintaining vigilance. Afaik, very few companies are at self-driving tier 3, which is where the company would be responsible for a crash. Tesla is not there yet.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        As other commenters have said, this is just not how the system works.

        I’ve got the dashcam footage and I know the driver. She can tell me when she hit the brakes, and she says she had the peddle as far down as it would go. The car didn’t begin decelerating in the same way an analog breaking system would have. That cost her a critical second and resulted in her rear-ending the vehicle in front of her.

        All of them have a hydraulic braking system where your foot on the pedal is immediately converted to braking pressure.

        Then maybe the breaks were bad. Idk. But she had plenty of lead time (presumably thanks to the super-advanced cruise control or whatever you want to call it) at the beginning of the video. The vehicle simply didn’t stop in time.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ll never buy one, and it’s 66% because of him. The other 34% is the fact Tesla’s are shit quality vehicles. Geico literally refuses to insure the cyber cuck. I didn’t misspell that.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    5 days ago

    The best car

    Teslas aren’t even the best electric car. On top of that I would 100% want a Rivian over a cybertruck. Yeah goofy headlights… but better then a wholeass goofy body.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    5 days ago

    He went from “genius” to “dumbass” when he announced his hyperloop a decade ago, and finally to “someone I have perfect hatred for” in less than a few months given his recent conduct. I don’t want his cars, I don’t want his robots, I don’t want to see his face ever again. He’s a piece of shit. If he died, I’d be in line to piss on his grave.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’d buy an XPeng or a BYD or the like.

    Well, good for you. Personally I’m not buying an internet connected Chinese car. If a car has the option of spying on you, and potentially be used in a hybrid attack, I’d prefer to get a car from a western manufacturer. And not Tesla either, Musk is too unstable and seems to be influenced by the same powers that has Trump’s ball in a vise.

    My current car is an internet connected EV, but it sure isn’t Chinese or a Tesla.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        As I indicated by using first person singular in my comment, I was talking about me. What car you (second, singular) get is up to you.

        While I did write “If a car has the option of spying on you[…]”, I hope my usage of “you” as an informal pronoun was clear. I do realize that I could have used the word “one” instead, or rewritten the sentence entirely. I wrote like I speak, and I unfortunately do not speak like an English professor.

        Please remind me, where did you tell me that you live in China?

          • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            You’re the one who got mad that I didn’t know that you live in China. You hadn’t told me, or given me any clues. I mean there’s 1.450 billion people who speak English either natively or as second language. 10 million of those live in China. That means there’s a 99.3% chance that a random English speaker doesn’t live in China. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_English-speaking_population

            But do go on, keep staying pissed at me for something you misunderstood. I never said that you (as in you, not one) or anyone else for that matter, should not buy a Chinese EV. I said that I wouldn’t, and gave my reasons why. In the meantime, while you stay pissed, I’ll continue to not own a Chinese EV, maybe while telling my students about what happened in early summer 1989 on Tiananmen Square, and how Winnie the Poo is treating the Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Your electronics you used to post this were made in China. Apple’s $1000 phones are made in China. Nintendo consoles are assembled in China, as is Playstation and Xbox. If you used anything you liked in the last ~30 years, China had a hand somewhere in it.

        China doesn’t have a magic power to remove all stability from its materials like a shitty alchemist, companies produce cheap bullshit because its cheaper to sell new ones than to fix old ones. It’s not some grand mystery of “MSG-elements” or whatever it will be called in the future. It’s simply that economics cares more about short-term profits than long-term gains. And cheap shitty materials will do that in any country that makes them.

        There’s junk from Germany, shit from Spain, and ass from America. Borders don’t inherently change the outcome of a assembly line’s finalized product. I’ve had good paper from America, great pens from China, and nice leather from Italy. But I can also walk to any metropolitan area in each of those countries and find you the cheapest, filmiest bullshit possible within the hour of stepping off that plane, that proudly states “MADE IN $LOCAL_COUNTRY”.

      • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        My Milwaukee tools were made in China and they are fantastic. Sure, some cheap chinese made stuff is crap but the higher end chinese products are every bit as good japanese or western made now.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Nearly a third of the world’s manufacturing is done in China. That’s good stuff and crap and everything in between. Chinesium exists because of engineering for a price point, and people are cheap.

          • This here exactly. There’s shit products made in China. There’s brilliant products made in China. It’s just like everything else as per the old adage: YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR!

            If you only want to pay shit product prices, you get shit products. A variant of “play stupid games, win stupid prizes”.

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    5 days ago

    I do want the best car. I am rejecting Tesla as an option mostly on that basis. But it also feels nice to avoid directly giving money to Trickle-Down Elmo.

      • Jay@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 days ago

        At least the toyota guy is lifting his legs and putting some effort into that jump.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        For some reason it reminds me of Stuart the Look What I Can Do kid from MADtv. It’s the expression on his face and his half assed effort to jump in the air with like feigned enthusiasm.

        • darko8472@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Top Gear, they absolutely wrecked that truck and it kept running with some basic repairs and maintenance. Even demolished a building with it on top and got it running again.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    I wonder how much longer it will be until the board of directors of the various companies he’s involved in start a serious revolt and push to get him out of the company?

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Pretty much up until 2020 I was thinking about a Tesla for my first EV. In '22 the time came for a new car and I went with a different EV because Tesla’s quality control has plummeted due to Elon’s reckless leadership.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      I never liked Teslas for their lack of things like physical volume knobs for the stereo. In my brutal dictatorship, being an executive, manager, engineer or shareholder at a company that manufactures vehicles that installs touch screens at stations for required crewmembers will be punishable by death by coal power plant. “You have to take your eyes off the road to change the radio station.” Report to your new job working for the power company. As fuel. Get on the conveyor belt, you’ll know when your shift starts.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      6 days ago

      Politics aside, if Musk wasn’t in charge of Tesla, Tesla would make better cars.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 days ago

          And even if they did decide to make a useless truck, it probably wouldn’t have five recalls in the first year.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m not sure why you put the big rig in the same loony bin as cybertruck. We need to get diesel out of that industry as well, and Tesla Semi seems to be the most advanced contender and has had great reviews from pilot customers

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Yes, it’s a bit heavier than a Diesel, reducing the maximum payload. However not all trips are at the maximum weight.

              Yes I’ve read “armchair generals” proclaim it’s too heavy to be useful, but I’ve also read reviews from it in actual use where it’s worked really well. What I have NOT read is anything about what percentage of trips that reduced payload weight would affect.

              Apparently they have happy pilot customers, enough to plan on mass production and to start building chargers

              Edit: fascinating plan to build out zero emissions truck corridors covering most of the us by 2040. We need this to pan out!

              This looks like a great plan to build out a useful charging network relatively quickly, so manufacturers can start ramping up production and sales

              I also like that it covers both charging for EV trucks and hydrogen refueling. While I’m not convinced that hydrogen is anything more than oil companies trying to remain relevant, it does have some advantages - let the market decide what mix of technologies works!

              • They have happy customers for the Cybertruck. Doesn’t make that any less of an idiotic waste of metal.

                And Tesla has a long history of “planning” things that never quite come to be. I won’t be holding my breath on any kind of mass rollout of their semi rigs. If it happens, colour me surprised. Until it happens, though (and I mean really happens, not fake events like the recent robotaxi and optimus one), I will cheerfully say that it won’t happen.

                Because looking at Musk’s grand pronouncements, the odds are on my side.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  It seems like it mostly comes down to the 4680 batteries - is Tesla really scaling up? They should allow facilitate significant cost and weight improvements over older batteries, and there have been promising announcements this year

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I wanted a Tesla so badly until… well, Musk went crazy, and also very importantly they DON’T HAVE VEHICLE TO LOAD, which is insanely important to me.

  • Novamdomum@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    5 days ago

    My Tesla desire journey has gone from feeling like I was chasing a magical unicorn from the future to not wanting to go anywhere near it. I am planning on buying a new car in the next couple of years and I’d love it to be an EV with good range and short charging times but I don’t think it will be a Tesla now.