• DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 minutes ago

    The closest Walmart to me has about a dozen or so self checkout tills and there is usually a line of 20 people waiting to get to them. There’s 3 cashiers that are there to badge the machines when they need to check ID for alcohol or override the machine if you double scan an item. I love self checkouts in other stores but Walmart has always been infuriating.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The self checkout is a perfectly viable option, so long as Walmart can find the strength inside themselves to open 3-6 manned tills on a Sunday for folks with large carts or children. Nothing is more demoralizing than getting up to the checkouts after a huge shop and finding there isn’t a single till open whatsoever. Throw in a four-year-old who wants to help scan every item and you’re ready to burn the store down by the time you leave.

  • neonred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This says much about respect and social competence in this society when the first instinct is to mock and abuse someone with different priorities than yours.

        • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 hours ago

          asking for a cashier?

          That would be normal

          “I don’t work here”

          Is a rude response to the question whether they would like to use the self-checkout.

          • Johnny5@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            33 minutes ago

            Ehhhhh very mildly rude if at all. Like it’s not the most polite response but people are allowed to express themselves too

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            service is not something the client has to ask for but something the vendor provides. Just like you hold a door open for someone entering behind you, you provide that service, unasked. Having to ask for service is a failure in itself, it’s just “no service”.

        • NuanceDemon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          You mean demanding special attention rather than using the self-checkout like everyone else? Not sure I understand.

          • eleitl@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I expect that the management is responsible for adequate staffing. Self-checkout typically doesn’t even work. Not a boomer, not USian, YMMV.

              • eleitl@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Typically they need attendant attention, to be reset to be usable. Which makes it rather pointless. My expectation that checkout lines are to be adequately staffed with cashiers. This is, however, increasingly not a safe assumption, in Germany. I expect the situation to further deteriorate. As does everything else.

                • NuanceDemon@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  Here there are like 10 self-checkouts per 1 employee and they’re just there if the machine gets confused about a weight. It’s much better, and faster than waiting in the queue for a manned checkout. I can’t imagine wanting to go backward, where’s the benefit?

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            “service” is no “special attention” but I get to the conclusion our misunderstanding might be a socio-cultural thing

      • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Why bother going through the checkout at all, the fastest way out is straight through the door. Unrelated, the weather is changing so I’m thinking of buying a really big coat, and I’ll want pockets for my keys and other essentials.

      • neonred@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        I don’t know where you live but here theft is a crime and very antisocial and despicable.

        Someone has to pay for the thieves and prices rise because they have to compensate for theft. Even if prices in reality do not need to compensate, because margin is already big enough, it gives retail a free card to jack prices, which, in essence, is yet again against consumers.

        • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I genuinely can’t tell if you’re being facetious.

          I thought you were fully serious, but then I hit the line

          Even if prices in reality do not need to compensate, because margin is already big enough, it gives retail a free card to jack prices,

          And assumed you were just poking fun and the poor widdle corporations and their giant profit margins, but then you continued with your paragrap, and now I’m not sure again…

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            52 minutes ago

            But maybe you can explain where all the downvotes come from, because I don’t understand.

            Is thievery good? Only when thieving from companies? Is is socially acceptable to take what is not yours from others? Only from companies? Or from a stranger who has more than you? From a friend? What’s this all about?

          • neonred@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            No, I’m serious in all statements. Corpos will jack prices on any occassion that offers itself, so keep the number of those low.

        • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I don’t know where YOU live but Walmart is one of the biggest thieves in the USA. People working there still have to collect government assistance because they pay too little to live on.

        • lseif@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          it gives retail a free card to jack prices

          so blame the corpos for that. not your neighbour stealing some chicken.

  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I was once mistaken for an employee somewhere and my sleep deprivated response was to say “I am wearing pants so clearly I dont work here.” I have no fucken clue what that means but I think it was a threat.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Pretty sure I was at an Ace hardware or some shit. Like I said I was severely sleep deprived and was looking for something, pretty sure it was duck tape for reinforcing an air conditioner.

        Frankly speaking once I got to my car and realized what I said I started laughing my ass off since it was such a non sequitur.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Not wanting to do free work for a company (they don’t even give you a discount if you use self-service) is being a boomer?

    That’s the first time I’ve seen the word “boomer” on the opposite side of the word “sucker”.

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Refuse to do free work for a company—insist that the grocery store employees go and gather the items on your list from the shelves for you! Never set foot on the sales floor, do pickup orders online only!

      Background: It used to be that the proprietor of a store brought items you requested to the counter for you. In 1916, Piggly Wiggly pioneered a new grocery store model, requiring/allowing the customers to pick items off of the shelves themselves. Not only did they not give you a discount for doing their work for them, they raked in more money from impulse purchases. The increased sales more than offset the increase in shoplifting losses. A cynical, corporate ploy to bleed customers dry, and we just think it’s normal now!

      That is to say, the purpose of a grocery store is to provide food in exchange for currency. There’s no law of nature that I know of that says that having an underpaid teenager drag your food across the scanner is the only proper way to do check-out, just like there isn’t one that says only a store employee can pick items from the shelf.

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In other words, race to the bottom is race to the bottom.

        Those jobs were not cruel and demeaning as you seem to imply. In fact plenty of industries still operate that way (auto parts etc.) and they served a valuable purpose, to give work experience to that underpaid teenager.

        In fact if you go to a butcher shop, fishmonger, farm market etc. you will have your food handed to you by a human as well. And most people highly rate both the service and quality at such shops, with the employees usually being paid significantly more than at supermarkets, and having proper work hours and job security.

        So yes, I suppose Piggly Wiggly made food margins a little thinner. But considering I get better meat prices at my butcher than at a supermarket, who do you think benefited from that move the most? Most likely the same ones benefiting from the move towards a fully automated store like Amazon tested.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Maybe you can go the warehouse and pick it up from the boxes, drive down to the farm to het the produce or, even better, grow your own food ALL THE WHILE STILL PAYING FULL VALUE TO THE SUPERMARKET.

        “People used to have even more done for them and now they don’t and pay the same” is not the powerful argument for us having even less done for us that you think it is.

    • grandkaiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Exactly! Back in my day, people used to fill up my gas for me and carry my things up to my hotel room. Young people are getting lazy and entitled! Corporations need to make them work harder. Makes it hard to humiliate the poors if they make ME do the work.

      • Acters@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Tbh back then the pay was more fairly in line with cost of living for some of the jobs. however, it has been a good 20 or so year since it was more fair. Nowadays, it is absolutely scary the cost of living. it’s down right criminal.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Reading the comments, do people not like self checkout? Is it another one of these American things, that baffle the rest of the world? Like grocery baggers. I’m European, living in Poland and Denmark and if given the choice, I will always pick the store with self checkout. It’s simply faster. Only old people don’t use self check out, not because of boomer ideology, but because they need the cashier’s help.

    • gnu@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Self checkouts that just let you scan items without issue and accept payment are a nice enough idea for a bag or less of shopping, my problem with them is how they are implemented in reality (in Australia anyway). The first implementations I encountered I considered an useful addition but both the machines and the staffing changes due to them have steadily gone downhill in terms of user experience.

      Instead of a quick painless experience you get a horribly touchy weight sensor which can’t reliably handle particularly small items, particularly large items, or non-standard bags (and there are no longer standard bags due to plastic bag bans), a machine which demands assistant intervention at the slightest issue (and the assistants are understaffed so never arrive quickly), and when you finally get to payment it makes you click through an annoyingly slow interface to tell it you don’t have a rewards card and don’t care to donate to some charity before it will activate the card reader. To make things worse the manned checkouts are never staffed at a level - if any are even open - to cater for people with full trolleys so these end up clogging up the self checkouts (which have tiny bagging areas and are not intended to handle a trolley load) and making everything slower.

      The icing on the cake is the self checkout treating you like a thief and throwing errors if the camera system thinks you didn’t scan something in the trolley or letting off an alarm like you’re trying to make off with something when you just want to buy a can of paint.

      • Heavybell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah, I would rather wait for the one active checkout rather than have to go through the rigmarole of scanning one item, putting it in the bag, waiting for it to register before doing the next. The employees get to scan multiple things at once and do things like “scanned item x6”. Until self-checkout technology advances to the point I can do the same, it can fuck right off.

    • Moah
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m from France living in Sweden and I’ve seen people not wanting to use self-checkout because it’s used to cut cashier jobs. Where you’d get 4 cashiers, you just get one person watching the self checkout. I’m personally ambivalent about because I do find it faster and convenient, but it is indeed a loss of jobs

    • TetchyOyvind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I recently moved, and my now nearest store does not have self checkout. It’s horrible. I spend more time waiting in the line than actually finding my items in the store. During the three years i used my previous local store, I only had to wait for an unoccupied self checkout maybe two times.

    • Aqarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Depends on the SCO system. If I can swipe the item, swipe the card, and walk, then yeah, great. But if it can’t handle small items, can’t handle packages, and in particular makes you scan the receipt, no thanks. You cut an employee, eat the shrinkage and leave me alone.

  • Noble Shift@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Self checkout in the PNW rules.

    Self checkout in South (east) Florida sucks.

    Why? Because the volume is on 11, and the customer base is as dumb as a rock. Seriously, stand at any self checkout in SF for 10’ minutes and watch.

    In 11 minutes you will either want to kill them or yourself, sometimes it’s a tossup.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      “Not another minute! Pretty soon I’m going to stop playing who-shall-I-kill-first in my head and just go for what feels natural. I’m thinking me first, then you.” - Bernard Black

  • Tin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I enjoy turning this one around. “Oh, you’re one of those socialists who wants everybody else to do your work for you, too lazy to lift your own groceries. Nobody wants to work anymore!”

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I mean, walmart could easily fix that by having fucking cashiers.

    At the walmart I go to they put in like 60 self checkouts and have, maybe, one cashier running at a time.

    I don’t mind self checkout as a concept. Its fine if you are just buying a couple things, or something you might be personally embarassing for you… but they are not a replacement for cashiers.

    Cashiers and belts are needed to handle bigger purchases like monthly groceries and shit.

    Unless you are gonna take 25% off my bill for labor savings, I am not going to take my monthly shopping through a self checkout. I had to once when I had no choice, and I’ll never do it again.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I’m 100% against self checkout.

      They’ve put the burden of sale on you instead of themselves. If you fail to check something out accidentally, you are liable for theft.

      If they don’t have a cashier, I go to customer service and tell them to ring me up even if it’s one item.

      • Brown5500@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        NAL, but i believe that they have to show intent in order to prosecute. As long as the legal system works properly, they would have to prove that you’re lying when you say “I forgot that was down there”

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Which is why I’m against making people do big orders through self checkout, cause thats when an accident can happen.

        Not when you’re getting your genital itch cream.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          A lot of the grocery stores near me have a limit of 15 or 20 items for self-checkout. Safeway says “about 15 items” which is strangely vague. Any more and you have to go through a regular checkout.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            i would say even 10 items is to much for self checkout, but thats better than walmart expecting you to take a cartful of monthly groceries through self checkout.

            • Mellibird@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              At my local Walmart I regularly see people with their cart full of groceries going through the self checkout lanes. It’s immensely annoying when you only have 1 or 2 items. And it’s not like they don’t have cashiers either. There are even multiple self checkout lanes with belts and yet for some reason these people always go through the smaller self checkout lanes.

      • 2ncs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        I can’t imagine a judge taking a case where someone unwittingly stole something

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I admire your faith in our legal system but despair at you lack of imagination.

          They’ll prosecute a bag of money for potentially being involved in a crime.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Don’t need to get to a judge. They can just tresspass you and then you have to drive 30 miles to another supermarket cause you cant ever set foot in that one again.

          Thats enough to fuck shit up for a lot of people.

      • histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Not even cause the checker should have seen it but also what store prosecutes someone over 1 item

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Its cute that you are trying to twist what I said into something that I didnt say.

        No wait, not cute. the opposite of that.

        I said I want a 25% discount for doing their job and saving them the labor. Not that their labor is 25% of my bill.

        • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I have no clue. I guess you can look at the profit margin for a supermarket (Walmart is around 2%, I just checked), then figure out the average full food shop spend, and finally see what the average hourly wage is for a worker and how long it would take to ring up a full shop.

          Although, this also highlights why they can’t give OP 25% off as their margin isn’t anywhere near this figure. I guess we should also factor in handouts that companies like Walmart get from the government to subsidise their staff etc.

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            From reading a few reports, after looking this up, it seems walmart spend about 7% of it’s revenue on hiring, and about 32% on payroll. The other costs towards labor seem to vary greatly from source to source, depending on exactly what they take into consideration as a labor expense. So it is somewhere between 39% and 60% of the revenue.

            • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              So that other person was probably being super condescending for no reason? That’s kind of the impression I got when they said they had no idea the actual number.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If you have more stuff than will fit in the weighing platform it’s a logistical disaster. Hence why the belts and bagger system were invented in the first place.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            And then put the full bags back in the cart right on top of the stuff you still need to scan?

            • histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              There’s usually a platform you can leave 5-6 bags on till your cart is empty enough to through them back in there as you scan the rest

              • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                19 hours ago

                Yea no shit. Not everyone has the luxury of shopping as often as you do and we have to actually fill our carts. Also it sure seems like you are still using disposable bags which is a shame.

                • histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  You act as if it doesn’t work the same way with a full cart cause it does, so what if I am that wasn’t even the subject

        • stringere@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m just basing it off of being married to a Walmart manager for 10 years but hey, maybe outsiders’ anecdotal feelings on the topic are more accurate than observed first hand experience.

          Walmart is ALWAYS hiring cashiers.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yeah, and you know where they are? stocking shelves and picking for the online pickup orders. Not running checkout lines.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    So this is pro-self checkout? Why would you be pro self checkout? Besides the extra time and effort for the customer to check out if they have more than a couple items, I recently read an article saying that even for the companies they haven’t worked out: besides the problems and delays they cause where they have to provide employee assistance anyway (“Unexpected item in bag”, etc), they’ve lost more to theft and are having to spend more money on adding more anti-theft tech, etc. One company they interviewed is phasing them out.

    (edit after reading some comments) The article also talked about people getting in trouble for accidentally not getting something scanned.

    • Blyfh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I LOVE self-checkouts for small shopping. No human interaction bullshit. Just beep your stuff, whip out your card and go. Rarely do I encounter technical problems.

    • Crazazy [hey hi! :D]@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      17 hours ago

      For me it’s not the time spent at the checkout that matters, it’s the time spent waiting at the checkout. Also over here cashiers don’t bag your items for you, so you have to do that anyway

      Also also, they have these really handy hand scanners over here so I can already bag my items while I’m walking through the store, and then the only thing I have to do at self-checkout is hand in the scanner and pay for the groceries. That is genuinely a lot faster than normal cash register shenanigans.

    • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Why would you be pro self checkout? Besides the extra time and effort for the customer to check out if they have more than a couple items

      In what alternate reality does self-checkout take more time and effort?

      • If you go to a cashier then you have to wait in line. At my local supermarket there is one cashier vs. 16 self-checkout machines. Even if you go at an extremely busy time there is almost always a self-checkout machine available.
      • With self-checkout you simply scan the items from your basket and put them in your bag. With the cashier you have put all your items on the conveyor belt, wait for them to be scanned, then put them in your bag.
      • If you have more than a few items you simply grab a hand-scanner or just use the app on your phone and scan the items as you put them in your cart. Then you just go to a self-checkout machine and pay. No unloading the cart at checkout, you just pay and take your cart to your car.

      the problems and delays they cause where they have to provide employee assistance anyway (“Unexpected item in bag”, etc)

      What do you mean unexpected item in bag? The self checkout machine can’t look into my bag.

      The article also talked about people getting in trouble for accidentally not getting something scanned.

      Never seen that happen. You get random bag checks before you pay (so at that point it’s technically not theft). If you missed something, they simply re-scan all the items and you pay the correct amount, that’s all.

      • exasperation@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In the name of theft prevention and legal compliance, they do not give self checkout customers the same powers as actual cashier employees:

        • Self checkout customers cannot verify their own age for age-restricted items.
        • Self checkout customers cannot scan something and report the number of duplicates (e.g., scan a can and punch in that you’re buying 8 of them).
        • In most stores, self checkout customers are policed by the system to make sure that each item is placed onto a scale that weighs everything, and stops the process if weights don’t match up.
        • The ergonomics and flow of self checkout doesn’t allow for a conveyor belt style rapid scanning, because a self checkout station is a tighter space and tends to require bagging as you scan, instead of scanning and bagging separately and independently.
        • The frequency of produce code entries means that customers tend to be much slower to enter foods that don’t have bar codes.

        As a result, self checkout tends to be slower for customers who have more than 20 items. That might be offset if there’s a longer line for regular cashier, but if there’s no line the employee cashier is much faster.

        • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Self checkout customers cannot verify their own age for age-restricted items.

          Age verification happens asynchronously and causes zero delay for anyone who doesn’t look like a teenager. The employee overseeing the self-checkout gets an alert on their tablet-thingie, they take one look at me and press approve. You can just keep scanning items while this happens. Usually the ‘your age may be checked’ alert disappears within seconds.

          Self checkout customers cannot scan something and report the number of duplicates (e.g., scan a can and punch in that you’re buying 8 of them).

          They can where I live.

          In most stores, self checkout customers are policed by the system to make sure that each item is placed onto a scale that weighs everything, and stops the process if weights don’t match up.

          I’ve never seen that, and I’m not aware of any supermarket chain in my country that does this.

          The ergonomics and flow of self checkout doesn’t allow for a conveyor belt style rapid scanning, because a self checkout station is a tighter space and tends to require bagging as you scan, instead of scanning and bagging separately and independently.

          The conveyor belt slows things down. You take an item out of your basket, scan it and put it in your bag in one go instead of it being two separate actions. You’re only handling each item once instead of twice. Besides, if you’re planning to get a lot of items you scan while shopping, not at checkout. You get a portable scanner, put it slot on your cart and just scan each item as you put it in your cart.

          As a result, self checkout tends to be slower for customers who have more than 20 items.

          If you scan while you add items to your cart it takes less than 10 seconds to check out, regardless of how many items you have

          That might be offset if there’s a longer line for regular cashier, but if there’s no line the employee cashier is much faster.

          My local supermarket has a grand total of 1 regular cashier, versus 16 self checkouts. If you go during a busy time you have to stand in line. Since the regular cashier is basically only used by people who don’t want to or can’t use self-checkout for some reason (that is: usually elderly people) this line doesn’t move very fast.

          When it’s a quiet time of day there often isn’t a regular cashier at all and you have to ask the person overseeing the self-checkout who then has to call someone to help you out as they cannot leave the self-checkout isle unattended so you end up waiting for a cashier to arrive.

          Self checkout is always faster, by an order of magnitude.

        • SuDmit
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          From my personal experience, scanning things by yourself instead of more experienced cashier is somewhat slower (maybe 20-40% for large amounts?) for reasons you provided. The thing is, you don’t have to replace one cashier with one self-checkout, instead you may put like 5 of them and assign one employee to supervise them and solve things that need intervention like verifying age. Also when not in use (low amount of customers) they probably cost tiny fraction of employee’s wage. Idk about thefts though.

        • erin (she/her)
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Self checkout isn’t supposed to be for more than 10 or 15 items in most stores… obviously it would be less convenient in those cases.

          • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Self checkout works fine for large amounts of items. You grab a portable scanner at the entrance and scan items as you put them in your cart. When you arrive at checkout you already scanned all your items and all you have to do is pay.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Wait a minute, do you mean to tell me that the mighty MBA class are actually just short-sighted, trend-hopping, avaricious shitbags?

      Yeah, if you can’t pay people enough to notice and/or care if I steal from you, I get to steal from you. Them’s the rules.

      • Zess@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        “If you aren’t able to stop me, I get to rape you. Them’s the rules.”

        That’s how fucking stupid you sound.

    • CoolMatt@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Because the store is packed, they only have 2 cashiers on shift and I want to go home.

    • Kill_John_Lennon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I just like the feeling of privacy. When the staff redirects customers to the cashiers because there’s less queue than at the self checkout, I pretend not to hear with my headphones on.

      • AsheHole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Same. I’m one of the few people that prefers self checkout. Covid was a magical time for me while grocery shopping. No one awkwardly had to smile after eye contact, everyone gave space and avoided each other, just get in and get out without ever taking out my headphones. Self check out is always faster where I’m from too.

          • Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Ditto. Then, when we went back to “normal,” I felt like I had to pretend to hate it because everyone else hated it so much. For me, it felt like freedom and relief.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I only prefer self checkout when I’m buying rubbers and lube. Anything else I’d rather have the checkout person scan and bag for me.

        If you have social anxiety, the checkout person conversation is one of the easiest interactions for you to practice those skills on. “Hello, here are my items, thank you” is about the gist of what’s necessary.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They are HUGELY advantageous to shoplifters. My local grocery store did it for a few years and stopped all together.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    22 hours ago

    My parents refused to use the self-checkout because “They take people’s jobs.”

    They were hardcore republicans perfectly happy to make sure those jobs got paid shit.

    • dan@upvote.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Do they also book all their travel through travel agencies, always use full-service gas stations, valet their cars instead of parking on the street, make restaurant bookings through concierge services, etc? Those are people’s jobs too!

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Also, let’s not forget that you are doing someone’s job simply for using a shopping cart at all. Traditional grocers didn’t have anything like the aisles we wander through now. Rather, there would basically be a warehouse with a counter at the front. You walked up with your list of items, gave it to the grocer, and they would grab the items for you. Customers gathering goods themselves didn’t come about until the age of the supermarket starting in the mid 20th century.

        This is also why I have zero sympathy for stores that complain about theft and shrinkage. They’re the ones choosing to operate in a business model that makes theft easier. Traditional grocers didn’t have to worry about shoplifting, as everything was kept behind the counter. Sure, armed robbery was a concern then as it is now, but shoplifting wasn’t a concern.

        When the grocery stores abandoned the traditional model, they realized the money they saved on labor would more than make up for the increased losses due to shoplifting. And that was simply a choice they made. And it’s the same with self-checkout. They made a business decision that would inevitably result in increased theft, and they have no one to blame for it but themselves. If they don’t like the increased theft, they can go back to cashiers. Or hell, there’s nothing stopping Walmart from going all the way back to the traditional dry goods store model even. That would work really well with online orders as well. You don’t even let customers wander through most of the store. You just have a very long counter at the front of the store that customers walk up and tell the workers what they want. And the workers gather the order. You either wait for them to gather it, or you place the order in advance and have it ready when you pick it up. If Walmart did this, shoplifting would become virtually impossible. Their labor costs would skyrocket, but Walmart has it in its power to completely eliminate shoplifting if they really want to.

      • oldfart@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’d book a flight through a travel agency if these still existed. Booking online is pure dread to me. I’m too young to have ever seen a travel agency but the concept of not having to deal with Ryanair and Wizzair is very luring.

        • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Travel agent saved my ass about 10 years ago when my connecting flight was delayed in air while I was on it. Completely missed the final leg of my journey because of a storm. Middle of the night and she helped me switch everything over and rent a car to drive the rest of the way and even got me upgraded to a more fun one. This was when I was going to a job interview and flying in the night before.

    • Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      IE. We like the idea of slavery! Someone to do the dirty work while we act superior…while shopping at Walmart.