• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    2 months ago

    On one hand, eff Microsoft and install Debian. It’ll run on a potato.

    On the other hand, I look forward to the coming glut of secondhand PCs I can install Debian on.

    As melon scratchers go, that’s a honey doodle.

    • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think we’re gonna see a dramatic rise in Linux systems in the coming years if Microsoft keeps this course. Nvidia have started upping their Linux driver game as well so it’s gonna be a breeze to pick up decent second hand systems and reselling them with a proper OS that’ll take us to the end of the world in 24 years.

        • basmatii@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          And yet it’s stayed true. Linux is above 1% on steam and rising every year, it’s never been easier to buy a Linux device, or install and use Linux for desktop consumer purposes, and even the tech uninformed know Microsoft is a bag of dicks.

        • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          If you’re on a kernel newer than 5.6 (which is almost 5 years old now so you should be) you already have 64-bit time.

    • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why would you scratch a melon? How would you even know if it’s itchy???

      Can you scratch pumpkins too?

  • DharkStare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    My computer can’t upgrade to Win11 and I am buying a new one, but I’m putting Linux on it.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    I will not be upgrading to W11. Some time between now and when they sunset W10 I will be switching to Linux.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    PCs that can’t run Windows 11 are valuable to people who don’t want to wake up one morning and find they’ve been upgraded against their will.

      • Flying_Hellfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        A lot of people will just be paying for 0patch for a while, I’m sure. The remainder will just not patch at all and hope for the best.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          You also could just move to Windows 11 or Linux. Realistically Windows 11 isn’t that big of change. Windows 10 gas most of the same anti features.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    This isn’t news, it’s just the standard notice that Microsoft isn’t going to spend time making their new shiny OS work on 10+ year old hardware.

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      You make it sound like an older gaming rig wasn’t powerful enough to run win 11. It’s not about the older hardware being too weak, it’s about enforcing their TPM bullshit with which they aim to gradually create an apple style walled garden where they control what you can do with your machine.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I dunno, I’ve got a laptop who’s CPU was too new for win 8.1 to have drivers or support for it, and is too old to put win 11 on it…

      This is the first time they’ve intentionally cut off the ability to run their OS at all just based on hardware age when it could otherwise run it just fine.

      Not dedicating support to old hardware is one thing, blocking it intentionally is something else entirely.

      Oh, that laptop? High end gaming laptop that was 6 years old when Windows 11 released. The fact it’s blocked is flat out ridiculous, and defending it is equally ridiculous.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        They want you to buy a new Windows license. Also all of there bloated Electron apps run better on fast hardware

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s not what anyone is asking and if that’s what MS said then they’re just dodging the issue entirely. If you buy a motherboard on your own today TPM still wouldn’t be enabled. And their “support” never went farther than hardware manufacturers registering where Windows could pull driver updates from. So that’s just the worst take I’ve seen in this whole thing.

  • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Or I could switch to Linux…

    OH WAIT, I already did that, darn. Such a shame I can’t ditch Windows twice.

  • 5dh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Windows isn’t even that good. The OS is kind of a huge mess. It has two unfortunate advantages though: it’s the default on many devices, and (because of that) software availability is best. I wish it wasn’t the case.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      It also has the benefit of inertia. Everyone knows Microsoft from either school or marketing. They are the standard and anyone else has to fight decades of standards. It also helps that they historically created the best tools for easily managing fleets on machines. Now days they are pushing everyone to Azure but before they had the best tools to build your business on. It was so convenient to have Windows server with all the server stuff like AD, SQL and IIS. They basically were they only well known option until the last 5-10 years.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      PowerShell is another advantage, oddly enough, though I’ve been worried for a bit the direction they’re going with that… Everything they’re doing now is Azure and they’re pushing everything to Graph, and the way all of it works is a massive pain for anyone trying to use PowerShell the way it was designed to be used

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Python exists but I personally like PowerShell more. I’m not crazy about it being Microsoft owned, but it’s at least open source at this point, for whatever that’s worth.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    After about 10 hours of reading and video watching, it seems pretty unanimous that linux mint with cinnamon is the easiest one to use and everything else is hobbyist stuff.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I just would like to point out that you would not be using Windows 10 on or past Oct 2025. You have exactly one year to move on.

    As soon as it reached end of life you know it will immediately be a huge target. Don’t let personal preference put you at risk.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, not really? Unless someone holds onto a really bad exploit until after that point, it’ll be no different than going increasingly behind on updates, there’s no magic switch that will be thrown that makes it more vulnerable after EOL

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because MS is so good at quickly releasing quality patches for every vulnerability that it’s not already a huge target?

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Compared to not getting any patches at all? That doesn’t seem like a good justification for staying on something EOL.

        • Don_alForno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I stayed on XP until some game I wanted didn’t work (by that time, 7 was out), I stayed on 7 until some game I wanted didn’t work (by that time, 10 was out). Nothing bad happened to me. I’ll take my chances. At least until I find the time to get into Linux, whenever that may be.

  • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    If one’s hardware is 10+ years old, I don’t think upgrading to the latest OS is likely high on their list of priorities.