• BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I will not be upgrading to W11. Some time between now and when they sunset W10 I will be switching to Linux.

  • laurelraven@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Or I could switch to Linux…

    OH WAIT, I already did that, darn. Such a shame I can’t ditch Windows twice.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    20 hours ago

    PCs that can’t run Windows 11 are valuable to people who don’t want to wake up one morning and find they’ve been upgraded against their will.

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 day ago

    On one hand, eff Microsoft and install Debian. It’ll run on a potato.

    On the other hand, I look forward to the coming glut of secondhand PCs I can install Debian on.

    As melon scratchers go, that’s a honey doodle.

    • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Why would you scratch a melon? How would you even know if it’s itchy???

      Can you scratch pumpkins too?

    • Vinny_93@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think we’re gonna see a dramatic rise in Linux systems in the coming years if Microsoft keeps this course. Nvidia have started upping their Linux driver game as well so it’s gonna be a breeze to pick up decent second hand systems and reselling them with a proper OS that’ll take us to the end of the world in 24 years.

        • uid0gid0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If you’re on a kernel newer than 5.6 (which is almost 5 years old now so you should be) you already have 64-bit time.

        • basmatii@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          And yet it’s stayed true. Linux is above 1% on steam and rising every year, it’s never been easier to buy a Linux device, or install and use Linux for desktop consumer purposes, and even the tech uninformed know Microsoft is a bag of dicks.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    This isn’t news, it’s just the standard notice that Microsoft isn’t going to spend time making their new shiny OS work on 10+ year old hardware.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I dunno, I’ve got a laptop who’s CPU was too new for win 8.1 to have drivers or support for it, and is too old to put win 11 on it…

      This is the first time they’ve intentionally cut off the ability to run their OS at all just based on hardware age when it could otherwise run it just fine.

      Not dedicating support to old hardware is one thing, blocking it intentionally is something else entirely.

      Oh, that laptop? High end gaming laptop that was 6 years old when Windows 11 released. The fact it’s blocked is flat out ridiculous, and defending it is equally ridiculous.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They want you to buy a new Windows license. Also all of there bloated Electron apps run better on fast hardware

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You make it sound like an older gaming rig wasn’t powerful enough to run win 11. It’s not about the older hardware being too weak, it’s about enforcing their TPM bullshit with which they aim to gradually create an apple style walled garden where they control what you can do with your machine.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s not what anyone is asking and if that’s what MS said then they’re just dodging the issue entirely. If you buy a motherboard on your own today TPM still wouldn’t be enabled. And their “support” never went farther than hardware manufacturers registering where Windows could pull driver updates from. So that’s just the worst take I’ve seen in this whole thing.

  • 5dh@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Windows isn’t even that good. The OS is kind of a huge mess. It has two unfortunate advantages though: it’s the default on many devices, and (because of that) software availability is best. I wish it wasn’t the case.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It also has the benefit of inertia. Everyone knows Microsoft from either school or marketing. They are the standard and anyone else has to fight decades of standards. It also helps that they historically created the best tools for easily managing fleets on machines. Now days they are pushing everyone to Azure but before they had the best tools to build your business on. It was so convenient to have Windows server with all the server stuff like AD, SQL and IIS. They basically were they only well known option until the last 5-10 years.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      PowerShell is another advantage, oddly enough, though I’ve been worried for a bit the direction they’re going with that… Everything they’re doing now is Azure and they’re pushing everything to Graph, and the way all of it works is a massive pain for anyone trying to use PowerShell the way it was designed to be used

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    After about 10 hours of reading and video watching, it seems pretty unanimous that linux mint with cinnamon is the easiest one to use and everything else is hobbyist stuff.

  • Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Humm, I installed Windows 11 on a really old Dell laptop (clean install). I’m sure it was not HW supported but it installed fine. I may have had to click something like, " Yeah I know it doesn’t meet the specs"; but otherwise fine.

    No, I don’t like Windows but it’s what my partner needed at the time.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      As long as it is 8th gen Intel or newer it is officially supported. It depends on what you mean by “really old.” I have hardware from the early 2000s that runs Debian.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      For 1 year at most. After that you need to either move to Windows 11 or switch to a different platform like Linux or Mac OS.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I just would like to point out that you would not be using Windows 10 on or past Oct 2025. You have exactly one year to move on.

    As soon as it reached end of life you know it will immediately be a huge target. Don’t let personal preference put you at risk.

    • laurelraven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I mean, not really? Unless someone holds onto a really bad exploit until after that point, it’ll be no different than going increasingly behind on updates, there’s no magic switch that will be thrown that makes it more vulnerable after EOL

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Because MS is so good at quickly releasing quality patches for every vulnerability that it’s not already a huge target?

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Compared to not getting any patches at all? That doesn’t seem like a good justification for staying on something EOL.

        • Don_alForno@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I stayed on XP until some game I wanted didn’t work (by that time, 7 was out), I stayed on 7 until some game I wanted didn’t work (by that time, 10 was out). Nothing bad happened to me. I’ll take my chances. At least until I find the time to get into Linux, whenever that may be.