Microsoft’s advice may make some sense from a limited perspective, but it glosses over concerns about a towering scrapheap of Windows 10 PCs

Neowin noticed that Microsoft has updated a help document about what it means if you’re using an unsupported version of Windows (spoiler alert: if you’re online at all, it’s a huge security risk), which currently means PCs running Windows 8.1 (or 8) and Windows 7, or earlier.

It’s worth noting, however, that this will also be the case for Windows 10 devices in a year’s time if their owners don’t take any action, as the end of support rolls around for that OS in October 2025.

Microsoft’s article takes the form of a short discussion followed by a FAQ, and the main update applied to the document pertains to the options for staying supported with Windows, with a new choice added here: ‘Recommended: New PC with Windows 11.’

So, this is Microsoft’s primary recommendation if your unsupported PC isn’t up to scratch, hardware-wise, for Windows 11 – get a new computer.

Given that, it’d be nice to see Microsoft working towards a solution in respect of somewhat newer PCs, which goes somewhere down the path of tackling some of the alarming stats we’ve heard about the number of Windows 10 machines heading to landfill in the future. This is a potential environmental disaster that could see hundreds of millions of PCs lumped unceremoniously on the scrapheap.

And ever since those concerns have been raised, we haven’t heard anything from Microsoft as to how they might be mitigated. What Windows 10 users (who can’t, or won’t, upgrade) can do is pay for extended support beyond October 2025 – but that could turn out to be an expensive way to go, particularly beyond the first year if Microsoft’s previous pricing in these schemes is anything to go by.

Logically, then, Microsoft needs to be looking at a way of keeping Windows 10 alive – for those totally blocked by Windows 11’s more demanding requirements on the security front and elsewhere – which works out to be way more cost-friendly for users, in an effort to save what might be a much heavier price to pay for the planet. In short, ‘buy a new PC’ will soon not be the answer we need frontloaded here, and pushing folks to make a purchase of a new computer is already a very dubious first port of call given what we’re facing down the road.

    • TheRedSpade@lemmy.worldEnglish
      34·
      2 months ago

      I just installed Mint to an external SSD this weekend to try and get my grandma to try it out. I really don’t want her scared into thinking she needs to go out and waste a few hundred on a new laptop.

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.mlEnglish
        16·
        2 months ago

        Did the same for my parents earlier this year. I downloaded a Windows 10 theme for Mint so it felt and looked more Windowsy for them.

        It’s been great for them. One piece of advice, make sure you sit down with your grandma after installing it and have her do everything she normally does on Windows.

        Make sure all the shortcuts and bookmarks are in the same spots and called the same things.

      • MrLLM@ani.socialEnglish
        4·
        2 months ago

        I think it might be worth developing some kind of Linux installer on place that is capable of removing Windows and replace it with some Linux flavor. Just one USB, some space in your disk and Linux is installed without data loss

        • Almrond@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          1 month ago

          The problem with this is primarily that windows uses NTFS as it’s filesystem. Being proprietary, NTFS has never played well with Linux and installing it to an NTFS partition is regarded as a genuinely terrible idea. Converting partitions safely is nearly impossible to do in place.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.caEnglish
    49·
    2 months ago

    I have the opposite opinion … I have one system of mine that has Win10 because I need it for one piece of software … and I absolutely do not want to upgrade to 11 even though I get almost daily reminders that I can.

    Once I stop using the software I have for Win10 … I’m deleting the OS and installing Linux

  • assembly@lemmy.worldEnglish
    40·
    2 months ago

    Home labs everywhere will soon have super cheap hardware options from PCs that can’t update to Windows 11 but are capable of running multiple virtual machines (like windows 11).

  • Franklin@lemmy.worldEnglish
    38·
    2 months ago

    There is now a workaround for Windows 11’s TPM 2.0 requirement built straight into Rufus.

    You can just check the box and it will put the necessary code to circumvent the requirement on the bootable USB.

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.oneEnglish
      5·
      2 months ago

      My understanding is that 24H2 crashes if you try that. Microsoft is starting to build their OS around the TPM, so that work around is bound to stop being helpful. I decided a few years ago to stop fighting Microsoft and do what they are asking me to do, stop using Windows.

      • Franklin@lemmy.worldEnglish
        4·
        2 months ago

        It crashes if you try the previous workaround. This new workaround made by the creator of Rufus still works.

        • Orygin@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          3·
          2 months ago

          It’s a game of cat and mouse. I’d be willing if I needed to use win11 myself but for my parents it’s either gonna be Linux or a new computer

  • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.worldEnglish
    31·
    2 months ago

    I’m running AntiX Linux on a shitty 2010 netbook and it runs like a champ. Intel Atom and 2gb RAM.

    We need svelter OSs, not new computers.

    • Piece_Maker@feddit.ukEnglish
      19·
      2 months ago

      Waiting for the army of MS shills coming to tell you that they can’t possibly use Linux because of the myriad high end professional-grade software they use which means absolutely no one could ever go near Linux either. Because that’s really important when it comes to getting more life out of your shitty 2gb Atom netbook

      • Halosheep@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        1 month ago

        The thing is that there are different target groups here that seem to disconnect. The gamers and tech dudes who want/have all the latest hardware and want to play every game maxed out aren’t the people affected, yet somehow they’re the ones who chime in for these discussions.

        My low end thinkpad from 2013 doesn’t need windows on it for any reason, so why bother being offended that it now can’t have a supported version?

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        1·
        1 month ago

        I think the big scare is just common questions like… what happens to all of content saved, will it still be accessible? What happens to my Outlook email that my nephew set up? What happens to subscriptions, will my VPN subscription work on Linux? What sort of device management does it have, can I link up my TV the same way?

    • selokichtli@lemmy.mlEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      I have an old Atom tablet with 2 GB RAM capable of running Linux with the generic Linux kernel from any genetic distribution. Granted, I’ve never tried AntiX. How do you manage? Each time I’ve tried Linux in this tablet, it honestly runs like crap.

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.worldEnglish
        6·
        2 months ago

        For basic stuff like what’s done in a browser I use the Falkon Browser. Very light weight. I will say it sucks for video acceleration though. 480p Max.

        I use it for YouTube, emails, word processing with libreoffice. Runs SNES emulators quite well too.

  • abrinael@lemmy.worldEnglish
    26·
    2 months ago

    It’s going to be real funny when a bunch of people that don’t care much about tech shrug this off and everyone else ends up having to deal with some massive botnet a few years down the line.

    • pyre@lemmy.worldEnglish
      16·
      2 months ago

      I think when they bought Bethesda they also let Todd Howard take over their statements.

  • Jtee@lemmy.worldEnglish
    19·
    2 months ago

    Machines that can’t run Win11 aren’t immediately obsolete. They can run earlier windows (even though support has ended or will eventually end), and Linux.

    And while I sound like I’m defending Microsoft, this is no different than Apple not supporting older Intel chips on their new OS’s. The big complaint here is the idea that all these unsupported machines are automatically destined for the landfill which I strongly believe is not correct.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.worldEnglish
      23·
      2 months ago

      There are a few fundamental differences here.

      One: the existing hardware isn’t lacking anything functional that the user requires. While it may be more secure implemented with TPM 2.0 its far from a hard requirement. After all bitlocker works on 10. The fact that you can presently work around it suggests the limitation is imposed from on high not a hardware requirement.

      Two: The hardware isn’t all that old. General duty cycle on a phone is around 3 years, about 6 years on a PC. Apple has dropped support for 6 year old phones and 10 year old PC. Especially because intel continues to manufacturer a given CPU long after launch and OEMs continue to integrate them people are going to find machines that they bought new off the shelf within the last 3 years unsupported which unlike a 10 year old Mac feels like a rug pull.

      • Th4tGuyII@fedia.io
        12·
        2 months ago

        Exactly this. It’s a completely arbitrary rug-pull made especially repugnant by the fact you can circumvent it quite easily with basically no loss of functionality.

        While modding Win11 is a perfectly legit option for home users, it’s not for businesses - as such many, many business-spec computers will be “obsolete” once security updates for Win10 end.

        Best you can hope for is that these computers pour into liquidation markets giving people the chance to buy decent quality PCs for cheap - but more likely they’ll become e-waste

      • ihatetheworld@lemmy.mlEnglish
        4·
        2 months ago

        Speaking of phones.

        I just had to buy new ones recently for the older folks at home because of the lack of VOLTE support on their phones. Those phones were perfectly fine and adequate for their use case (basic call, message) and they wouldn’t have to change phones if it were not for the 3G network termination.

        Now they have new phones with functions that they will never ever use.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.worldEnglish
          9·
          2 months ago

          VOLTE is a hard requirement. Continuing to support them would require entire installations all over the country to be repaired, maintained, and installed in support of hardware that was mostly 7-12 years old long past expected lifespan. It’s like the opposite of the Windows 11 thing.

  • Remmy@lemmy.caEnglish
    17·
    2 months ago

    Companies will bloviate on about how they care about the environment and want to reduce e-waste, but then do crap like this!

  • umami_wasabi@lemmy.mlEnglish
    16·
    2 months ago

    I will be waiting for cheap perfectly in good shape PC thrown out due to the upgrade on eBay.

  • Asetru@feddit.orgEnglish
    16·
    2 months ago

    Right now we’re releasing Windows 10, and because Windows 10 is the last version of Windows, we’re all still working on Windows 10.

    It’s all about Windows as a service

    Windows isn’t dead, but the idea of version numbers could be

    Recent comments at Ignite about Windows 10 are reflective of the way Windows will be delivered as a service bringing new innovations and updates in an ongoing manner, with continuous value for our consumer and business customers

    https://www.theverge.com/2015/5/7/8568473/windows-10-last-version-of-windows

    • neumast@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      2 months ago

      And then they threw out windows 11 in what felt like 2 months from announcement to shipping

    • hex@programming.devEnglish
      2·
      1 month ago

      “Version numbers could be [dead]”

      … Do they think version numbers don’t have a purpose, or that they’re just for marketing? It’s pretty helpful to know breaking changes vs non-breaking changes in a version number

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      1·
      2 months ago

      The first obviously isn’t saying “this is the final version” it’s using “last” as in “latest”, and the others fall apart with the first.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.oneEnglish
    12·
    2 months ago

    Thanks Microsoft. I am going to have to upgrade my computer now. However, Windows isn’t being upgraded to 11 when it it comes to this.

  • bstix@feddit.dkEnglish
    10·
    2 months ago

    It would be nice if they would stop pushing the update on computers that can’t run the update anyway.

  • HeyJoe@lemmy.worldEnglish
    9·
    2 months ago

    So far, I have installed Windows 11 on 4 devices that were not allowed due to TPM or CPU, and all have worked fine. I will continue this until it either no longer works correctly, or they finally stop allowing it.

    The best one so far is an older Dell precision I have at work from like 2015 with a xeon chip, and they don’t support it. Works great so far, and I even put hyper-v on it with another Windows 11 running for testing purposes. I’m super happy because the company has ran out of money and even though I am up for an upgrade there is no way they are giving me a system this beefy again so I will milk it for as long as I can!

    • 0^2@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      12·
      2 months ago

      So… When they inevitably push an update that borks your system, you will definitely will be prepared and ready to jump to another OS cause you definitely had time testing and making sure everything works on them and not just be caught with your pants down.