• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I wonder what the world would be like if that IBM source code which is the backbone for all financial transactions and payment gateways weren’t tightly controlled proprietary tech.

    More fraud maybe, but less nickel and dime trickle upwards.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Well after living through 2008, I am convinced the DoJ will magically forget about thise whole thing in a few years lol.

  • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Visa should be nationalized. Let the government run the payment processing if we are only going to have only one.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Christ…this needed to be major news a year ago. We really need to get banks out of the payment business but fear that they are pulling an Intuit and will make the FedNow system more challenging to use down the road.

    • paf0@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’d love to see the federal reserve issue a no fee stablecoin, though I wonder if it would be secure in the long term with quantum coming.

        • paf0@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Because electronic payments that do not require a middleman are inherently better than funneling everything through centralized organizations like Visa. They could make their own dollar based blockchain that has secure and private transactions based on their own stablecoin. It would be the same as a cash payment.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Again, why would the government waste real money doing that with fake money, when they can do it with real money instead? What benefit is there, over just being a regular processor for real money? Because it’s definitely not the inability to reverse transactions in blockchain systems, that’s more of a feature for criminals.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Actually, that is a decent point in this idea’s favor. Don’t think that’ll overcome the downsides, but I’ll give you a point for that one all the same.

            • paf0@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              It would be real money if the federal reserve issued it. Cash still exists, is that a feature for criminals or does it benefit the poor and unbanked?

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 hours ago

                It would be real money if the federal reserve issued it.

                No, as you said, its a stable coin backed by real money.

                Cash still exists, is that a feature for criminals or does it benefit the poor and unbanked?

                Cash transactions can easily be reversed, unlike blockchain, but nice bait.

            • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              if the government was to do their own crypto it could do a lot to disrupt the current unregulated “stablecoins” that currently exist, i could see it happing if for no other reason than to fight money laundering. If the fed is doing it, it becomes “real” money and most people would probably prefer a fed coin to something like usdt.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                3 hours ago

                What benefit is there, over just being a regular processor for real money?

                Online payments, which is a lot of transactions.

                Pretty sure the current system of real money already handles that one friend.

  • subignition@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    10 hours ago

    DOJ is really going at it lately.

    I can’t wait to hear about the outcome of this litigation in 20-25 years.

    • ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Right?

      Going after Google AND Visa?!

      Even if it’s all theatrics, the Justice department hasn’t really showed up to work in recent memory and this is a refreshing change from the void abyss DOJ usually haunts

      • Xtallll
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The Bush jr administration illegally made political hiring and firing decisions for DOJ positions. We are just now getting far enough away from that to have the DOJ right itself.

        • med@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 hours ago

          According to Cory Doctorow, Rupert Murdoch owned newspapers have made over 100 editorials attempting to smear Lina Khan at the FTC. A cursory google search seems to corroborate this assertion.

          I’m inclined to agree that there’s nothing ‘election year’ about these cases, and that real work is being done to claw back some measure of control from these monopolies.

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 hours ago

          This stuff takes a while to get going.

          The FTC sued to stop Microsoft from acquiring Activision in December 2022, but lost.

          DOJ sued Google in January 2023, and won their trial last month.

          The FTC and DOJ started rulemaking on new merger disclosure and review requirements in June 2023.

          The FTC sued Amazon in September 2023.

          DOJ sued Ticketmaster/Live Nation in May 2024.

          The last two years have shown aggressive antitrust enforcement for the first time in about 50 years, when Robert Bork basically convinced the Supreme Court and all Republicans to impose almost impossible standards for antitrust regulations.

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    The DOJ isn’t going after this, but VISA is also the source of all these fucking porn bans on like Tumblr and shit because if you want to be able to use their payment processing, you also have to follow their fucking puritan ass values.

    Honestly, if this kicks that secondary issue in its ass, that’s amazing.

    • KillerTofu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Not exactly puritan to expect that if you’re serving porn you’ve done at least the base line vetting to make sure it’s not child porn or non-consensual.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        10 hours ago

        No, puritan ass values like not being a porn site. It is the government’s job to regulate illegal content, not payment processors.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Then what about the fact they also ban payments for legalized weed? Nothing CP or non-consensual there.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Because weed is still federally illegal. So regardless of what each individual state says, Visa is beholden to federal law, just like banks.

  • Kethal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    10 hours ago

    These network transactions cost between 2 to 4 % for merchants, which is a cost passed to consumers by businesses raising prices. That’s a fairly large “inflation”, and certainly it seems out of line with the effort they out into it. It’s anticompetitive practices that keep it in place.

    • noredcandy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Fwiw debit card transaction are capped around 21 cents per transaction depending on the size of the bank holding the account. You’re right for credit cards though. Also, imho, I’ve never seen merchants pass along these debit card savings to the consumer. With they would though.

      • Mataresian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Whether they directly pass the costs or indirectly, these are still costs made by the seller. In other words either the costs are passed on by the credit card customers or simply all customers. Somebody has to pay for the costs and in the end the seller has to make some profit to survive.

      • jh34ghu43gu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Those truck stops that have the X gas price for cash Y gas price for credit (x < y) are a good example of a merchant passing the savings onto consumers. More niche is all the coin shops I’ve been to pass the fee onto you if you use a card.

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’ve never heard of that cap! Any references.

        Also, imho, I’ve never seen merchants pass along these debit card savings to the consumer. With they would though.

        Gas stations do! But not really passing the savings, just flipping it by penalizing credit cards.

        They can easily say, “Actually it’s 0.10 off by using a debit” as opposed to “it’s 0.10 more for using credit”.

      • booly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, you can think of it as a simple transaction fee for debit transactions, and a full blown credit and risk shifting system for credit transactions. The banks charge high fees for credit transactions because they’re actually lending money and bearing some credit risk for them, whereas the debit transactions are just moving money from one account to another.

        • noredcandy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Banks charge higher fees for credit transactions to fuel the loyalty programs (flyer miles, cash back, etc) on those cards. This is why you no longer get any loyalty benefits on debit cards but you still do on credit. The fees don’t cover the risk on credit cards , the interest does.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    What isn’t a monopoly anymore? Which doesn’t make their ultimate goal is to fuck people to make a profit. Latest one that hit me hard is cat car manufacturers selling people’s data to the insurance companies and people are getting insurance price bike hike(fuck you, Google and fuck your fucking keyboard) for no reason.

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      cat manufacturers

      insurance price bike

      I know exactly what you meant but these typos are strangely hilarious. Cheers, we all make silly typos sometimes. Me especially when I’m typing on a phone because I hate using autocorrect.

      For anyone confused: car manufacturers / price hike

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Look what you did? You opened a can of worms. Lmao. You could have just let it slide and I would have caught it, because I’m a maniac and always go back to my comments and re-read them.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        This is 100% Gboard autocorrecting words that are already correct. It feels the need to speak for me. I’m so fucking sick of it changing already correct words to what it thinks I need to type. I’ve even fucking emailed Google about it. They think they’re helping us type better and faster, but they’re actually making us type slower, as we have to fucking double check everything we type.

        • Ghostie21@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You realize you could have turned the auto correct off probably 100 times over the amount you have complained about it right? Takes 2 seconds.

          • penquin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Have you tried typing without it? It’s so fucking painful with my fat fingers. No worries, though. I’ve found a better keyboard. Free and open source. FUTO Keyboard. I’ll keep using it over Google’s shit. Thanks to Louis Rossmann

            • Ledivin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Man, the vitriol on display here is wild for what is, in the end, both a ridiculously minor problem and a ridiculously easy fix.

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            That’s certainly what I did years ago now. I think for some folks old habits die hard and people aren’t wrong that it used to be better. 🤷

            • penquin@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              I don’t know why you got downvoted. You’re right, it’s really difficult typing without autocorrect now. It was easier on physical T9, but this is all touch and you’ll keep missing.

        • subignition@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          If I were a conspiracy theorist I’d say they’re deliberately making it shittier to push voice-to-text for that sweet, sweet AI training data.

          But I think it’s probably just incompetence. Keyboards from a decade ago were a lot better at learning your typing/swiping patterns, I feel.

          • penquin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I don’t think it’s a conspiracy. Like you said, it’s incompetence. I’ve found a better keyboard luckily. FUTO. It’s baserd on the AOSP keyboard and it even has sliders to make autocorrect more or less aggressive, and to get a local AI involved more or less as you please. Keyboard is FOSS, too. Fuck Google Keyboard 🖕🏽