• xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Anon could’ve bought an electronic air duster and had a clean PC for years! But good on you, anon. Cleaning out your PC is important.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      36 minutes ago

      Yep, bit more expensive up front but pays for itself and performance doesn’t massively downgrade as the can cools down, and is stronger anyway

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    They check ID for compressed air? Where is this?

    Now something like 99.99% alcohol electronics cleaner I would understand because people use it to cut meth or some other wild shit.

      • Dave2
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Causes instant death but also addiction? They resurrect me and I immediately go for another can of air duster.

      • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Is it maybe an US-exclusive thing? Due to less stricter regulations maybe? I’m from Europe and no compressed air was 18+ or had warning signs like “causes instant death”

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Probably because you can buy beer at 16, so no one is trying to get high on office supplies.

          • Sparky
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Not Europe but here in Norway I do see people huffing nitrous oxide. We do have a legal drinking age of 18 tho

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        A DuPont study tried HFC-152a and HFC-134a on rats, dogs, and humans for time periods of up to three months with a followup examination 2 years with no adverse effects. LINK

        I’m sure this has nothing to do with the USA’S proposed ban DFE last month despite it functioning as a zero-potential for ozone-depletions alternative to CFCs.

        That red line you drew could just be explained by market availability of the new Aerosol that convienently excludes the CFC equivalents which existed before and were banned.