Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently made headlines for calling perennial Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein “predatory” and “not serious.” AOC is right.

Giving voters more choices is a good thing for democracy. But third-party politics isn’t performance art. It’s hard work — which Stein is not doing. As AOC observed: “[When] all you do is show up once every four years to speak to people who are justifiably pissed off, but you’re just showing up once every four years to do that, you’re not serious.”

To be clear: AOC was not critiquing third parties as a whole, or the idea that we need more choices in our democracy. In fact, AOC specifically cited the Working Families Party as an example of an effective third party. The organization I lead, MoveOn, supports their 365-day-a-year efforts to build power for a pro-voter, multi-party system. And I understand third parties’ power to activate voters hungry for alternatives: I myself volunteered for Ralph Nader in 2000, and that experience helped shape my lifelong commitment to people-first politics.


Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

  • Zerlyna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    2 months ago

    I agree. The only time I hear her name is around election time. It’s too late then, the work needs to be done in between.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The way she, her party, and her campaign conduct themselves make it hard to avoid the conclusion that she’s running purely as a Democratic spoiler candidate (that is, with the intent of siphoning support away from the Democratic candidate).

      Edit: to be clear, I am a staunch supporter of environmentalist causes in general. I just don’t believe the Green Party actually is an environmentalist cause at the end of the day. I judge these things by actions, not by policy documents.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah environmental causes have a lot that can and must be done at the local level. I’m a staunch environmentalist, it’s my primary issue, and it’s why I’m angry at my local government. I wish we had a good third party because the election is decided in the democratic primaries. Get someone running on improving public transit, forcing all apartments to offer recycling (mostly concerned about glass and metal), improving bicycle infrastructure… But funnily enough the greens don’t seem to give two shits about that easy picking.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 months ago

      Especially using the name and clout to help the local races which are run more often. Get third parties well known regionally with serious candidates, you’ll see demand for them grow nationally.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        And some of these local places could use some good faith environmentalism. Co-opting the environmental cause to act purely as a spoiler is going to have consequences for hundreds of years in the US. Could you imagine if Ohio had had good faith green party elected officials raising a ruckus after the train de-railed? or the difference in Flint if there had been anyone there to say, hey wait a minute, that’s not how water works!

        Instead we’re building more highway lanes, farming the deserts, and looking the other way as corporations make people homeless. (Humans are horrible at living with the land, it’s not just homeless people. Check out any tourist camping area by the end of September.) That’s what really pisses me off.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          As an Ohioan want to know what party doesn’t bother running in Columbus? The greens. It’s proof to me that they don’t actually care about trying to govern.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Cheetos bag in the Carlsbad Caverns story says so much about our species in one breath.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        2 months ago

        It just implies it.

        The records of what she does, and the performative activism, which takes place entirely and exclusively during presidential election years - that’s what shows she isn’t putting in the work.

        After repeatedly losing in Mass, the only time she runs for anything is for presidential elections. This also demonstrates she isn’t putting in the work, or she would have more involvement in more local elections.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just because you don’t hear her name doesn’t mean she isn’t putting in the work

        This is about a politician supposedly running for a presidential office, that’s exactly what it means. If people aren’t hearing your name this close to an election you aren’t really trying.

        • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was responding to a comment that said they never hear her name outside of the presidential election cycle

          • teejay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            37
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes, we know. Now show us all of her political work that she’s done outside of presidential election cycles.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        2 months ago

        the only news I can find for Jill Stein from 2021-2023 is

        1. She was running Cornel West’s presidential campaign at some point, not sure what happened with that [link]

        2. she got in trouble with the FEC for campaign finance issues [link]

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    2 months ago

    These third party types always claim that they want to reform the system. That’s bullshit. If you want to reform this system then you need to start at the bottom. You need to recruit candidates and invest in winning at local and state level first. Those are the most winnable offices for an outsider/independent. Hell, win a few critical states and you can get enough states in the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact which, while not an ideal solution, would be a good first step in reforming the system.

    Once you have some power and recognition at the state level, you need to aim for Congress. Start winning seats in the House and Senate and you can really start making change. That is where the real power of change resides. How many times have we seen a president with a divided House and/or Senate have their policy goals effectively neutered by legislative antagonism? Without support from the House and Senate, a 3rd party president would be powerless.

    Stein cannot possibly enact positive change even if there were a literal miracle and she became president. The only thing, literally the only thing she can do by running for President is get Trump elected.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Without support from the House and Senate, a 3rd party president would be powerless.

      Or consider it from the other direction. In a party line vote on new policy, imagine if the difference was a couple green or progressive congressmen instead of the Manchins of the world

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 months ago

        If only they would run for Congress rather than screwing around every four years and knocking over the table.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because it’s literally not a solution. The absolute best case scenario is causing the closest ideological party to fail for many elections in a row before it disintegrates and reforms in the third party, which is now the second party in a two party system and filled with many of the same politicians and beholden to most of the same voters.

        Voting reform is the solution for everyone complaining about the two party system. Get ranked choice and leftier challengers who actually care about the results of elections will run against establishment politicians more often.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            2 months ago

            It doesn’t count because a 3rd party candidate will never win.

            It can decide an election because it’s removing a vote from the candidate closest to you who is actually electable.

            Let’s say you think taxation is theft, but you can’t vote for Trump because “reasons”. You vote Libertarian.

            You’ve taken your vote from Trump and given it to a candidate with no chance.

            Harris +50
            Trump +49
            Libertarian +1

            Flip it around, you support Roe vs. Wade but you can’t vote for Harris because “reasons”. You vote Green.

            You’ve taken your vote away from Harris and given it to a candidate with no chance.

            Trump +50
            Harris +49
            Green +1

            In neither case will it ACTUALLY be that close, but you get the idea.

            • Ion@lemmy.myserv.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              Why do liberals assume they are entitled to leftist votes? The entire DNC prevented anti genocide speakers, yet platformed former Republicans, the Israeli family of a hostage, etc. it’s clear the party is more invested in appealing to conservatives, so good luck 👍

                • Ion@lemmy.myserv.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Don’t worry. Dick Cheney, the architect of the invasion of Iraq, stepped up and took my vote for Kamala instead. Birds of a feather.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                2 months ago

                In a first past the post system, you either vote Democratic or you get the Republican. 3rd party is not an option.

              • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                Why do liberals assume they are entitled to leftist votes?

                Your confusing that with the fact that an overlap of two circles is a venn diagram.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            2 months ago

            You pulled out your Facebook memes to say you wanted to break the two party system by voting third party. Nothing about my response is trying to address whether you should be voting, but your chosen action is stupid and has no potential to accomplish what you say you want to do.

            Your username may be ironic, but outsourcing expressing feelings to a vague and not quite appropriate meme response rather than actually trying to say what you think and defend your personal opinions is one of the big reasons people shit on Boomers. Granted it’s a step up from my old conservative acquaintances on account of not also being in service of the most vile opinions humans espouse, but it’s just as tired and unwelcome.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              Jill Stein supports ranked choice voting, Kamala Harris doesn’t even mention it in her platform.

              A Jill Stein administration will:

              • Replace the exclusionary two-corporate-party system with an inclusive multi-party democracy through ranked-choice voting and proportional representation
              • Implement Ranked-Choice Voting for all elections nationwide
              • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                2 months ago

                Jill Stein says things and then does nothing to actually make them happen, like a lot of grifters. Weird how anti-establishment people can be so rightfully skeptical of Democratic politicians and hangers on, but then believe hook line and sinker that non-establishment voices are all in it for the ideology.

                • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Jill Stein says things and then does nothing to actually make them happen,

                  You are describing the Democrats not Jill Stein.

                • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  And because Kamala Harris doesn’t mention ranked choice voting, somehow that’s magically supposed to happen?

                  It doesn’t take a meme to find the flaw in that reasoning.

          • Iunnrais@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            2 months ago

            It affects the election, but not in the way you want. It is literally the equivalent of not voting at all. That does effect the outcome if you would have voted for one of the two main parties otherwise.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 months ago

            Oh ok, well here’s what it does: nothing at best, but when a third party does very well the major party they oppose most wins. That’s fptp, it’s not hard to figure out if you have more than a handful of brain cells.

      • Strawberry
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 months ago

        keyword “system”. It’s the system that formed the two party dynamic. In order to change that we must change the system that led to the problem

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        pol sci 101: fragile fptp systems (like the electoral college) tend to result in two parties.

      • Soup@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s because there’s never any serious third party candidates.

          • Soup@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Riiiiight…… It’s a lack of bravery that people aren’t voting for the useless 3rd party candidates that only surface every four years to split votes.

            Maybe it’s that everyone else is smart enough to see it for what it is- and you’re just…… not.

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        She’s actually been fairly effective for a new congressman. But in order to get meaningful change she needs both position and allies in congress. She has a number of allies (AKA The Squad) but because Congress is so full of old fucks, getting a position in a committee with any power at all is difficult at best.

        Meanwhile Jill Stein goes on TV, snipes at the democratic party and collects paychecks, all while eroding the party’s position all for literally no benefit whatsoever. The Green Party has been the single most ineffective third party in the history of the country. The only thing they’ve accomplished is siphoning off votes from Democrat presidential candidates and getting Republicans elected.

        • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Green Party has been the single most ineffective third party in the history of the country.

          oh, so the democrats have no interest in the green new deal? or expanding renewables? i know they don’t give a fuck about stopping war, but i think you are mistaken about the effectiveness of the green party.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            2 months ago

            i think you are mistaken about the effectiveness of the green party.

            Which green party senators or house members have pushed for that? How many of them are there? What national office holders are making the changes you’re looking for?

            • PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              which Prohibition Party senators passed prohibition? what do you think an effective so-called third party looks like in the us?

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                17
                ·
                2 months ago

                what do you think an effective so-called third party looks like in the us?

                Well for one, they’re elected to a national office where they can try to implement change.

                • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  And that’s never going to happen when they only come around once every 4 years to make a lame stab at president. They need to be building support at the state and local level year-round if they want to be taken seriously on the national stage.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah, if the greens succeeded at things I might consider voting for them. As it stands I don’t like the democrats but when they do well I get some of what I want. The more votes the greens get the less I get of what I want. I’d love to see a state with a green-dem coalition doing big things to demonstrate that they can actually govern as opposed to just run for office, and not even do that well.

    • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fully agree.

      My take as of late is that any 3rd party candidate who runs in our two party system can’t possibly be serious. They make a huge show, maybe get a message out, but almost always torpedo the party closest to them.

      With the Stein’s and RFKs in the news, it’s all sexy flashy publicity without any serious effort to have a 3rd party win.

      That said, there is another 3rd party personality that you might not have heard of in a while: Andrew Yang.

      I actually believe he is serious about electoral reform, in fact that’s the one issue his Forward Party is about. He and his team have worked quietly to help get ranked choice vote in local elections. He is not running for president as a spoiler candidate. He is not running for senate as an independent. He is putting in the work along with fairvote.org to make the structural changes needed to have viable 3rd party campaigns. We saw what happened in Alaska when ranked choice vote was present- they kept Sarah Palin from holding a Senate seat and elected a Democrat instead.

      If we had the NPVIC and ranked choice vote, our democracy would be much more representative, collaborative, and stable.

  • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 months ago

    If Left-Wing Third Parties are serious, they will start by running their candidates as spoilers in the Democratic Primary and appealing to voters to listen and add their platforms to the list of priorities to push the Dems on. They’d simultaneously work hard to get Ranked Choice passed nation-wide as that system is the most compatible with our country’s political system. Once they get that passed, they would join efforts to reform the Electoral College so it doesn’t require 270 votes, an then implement a more effective voting system for President that ensures that left-wing voters don’t get a Right-Wing president elected voting for Third Party options. They would also push hard to win at the City, County, and State levels, as well as in the Congress, so the Jill Steins of the world have friendly legislators to rely on.

    Ocasio-Cortez is right to call this out.

      • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        Honestly, yes. You can’t vote third party, and you can’t not vote, if you don’t want Trump in office. If you vote Third Party or stay home, you’re good with Trump being in office, which means you’re good with leaving minorities, non-Christians, transgendered people, and gay people up Project 2025 Shit Creek without a paddle. Given my wife is a Black bisexual Goth pagan, that means you want my wife to be hurt, and that pisses me the fuck off. And judging from the 15 other downvotes you have, I’m not the only one who feels that way.

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    2 months ago

    Well if she’s soooo unserious why would the Unicode consortium designate an emoji just for her?

    🤡

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 months ago

    How long has stein been campaigning and didn’t know basic information about Congress.

    She’s either not serious, an imbecile, or porque no los dos?

    That means why not both, Jill.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Go watch her breakfast club interview. So transparent that they are pandering with hollow buzz word mention. The hosts call her out pretty well. If they are real about an issue like ranked choice voting, then I want to see you become the face of that issue publicly for the next 4 years, until it’s passed into law through consensus and politicking, in a way that the green party clearly earns a place in a tangible victory.

    You won’t, that’s not what you’re being funded for, but that’s what you’d do if you actually cared.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Normally I’d agree with you. But the Green party is rather transparently not actually trying to get elected. They have the same level of seriousness as RFK who publicly stated he’ll only keep his name on the ballot in states where it helps Trump.

        If a third party did the leg work, spent a decade getting people elected to congress in every state, and then showed up in the presidential elections I’d be all for it. and before you whine about convenience, I’ve been saying the same thing to Libertarians and Greens for 2 decades now. They either aren’t serious, or they’re incompetent.

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        It absolutely is when you look at the reality of the situation. Stop spreading the 3rd party vote as a viable option misinformation. Where are these so-called 3rd party candidates in the local elections? With no local support, state assembly level, or Congress, these candidates would be useless as President.

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    I made the mistake of voting for her in the primaries exactly once years ago as a naive teenager, and vowed never again once her “campaigning” expounded on what she actually stood for and how.

    Green party… Plastic green, indeed.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Because to some their eternal purity is way more important than anything that could actually happen as a result of their actions. To throw your vote away in a protest that no party has ever cared about keeps your hands clean of any individual aspect of that party you don’t like and you can claim the moral high ground by “trying” to enact change, but at what cost to everything around you?

      It’s like the cartoon of the people living in a cave after climate change ruins everything saying “at least for a short time we made a lot of money for shareholders.” except it would be “at least I didn’t vote for Genocide Joe.”

    • febra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Because y’all claim to live in a democracy, so let people voice their opinions as votes.

      EDIT: Lmao, look at the downvoted. HOW DARE PEOPLE VOTE FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN WHAT I WANT

      • drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’d rather be able to vote for more then just the two parties. But I am also realistic and letting trump win so you can vote for someone who will never win is foolish.

  • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m commenting this a few times, but Alaska has implemented ranked choice, has a number of environmentalists and does outsized damage to the environment. If they were serious they’d run in state elections there, and four congress there. They are not.

  • shrimpdude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Also AOC('s party): “wE’rE wOrkInG tiRElessLy on a CeaSefiRe dEAL…” sends $20B in arms to Israel

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Since the start of  Israel’s war with Hamason October 7, 2023, the United States has enacted legislation providing at least $12.5 billion in military aid to Israel, which includes $3.8 billion from a bill in March 2024 (in line with the current MOU) and $8.7 billion from a supplemental appropriations act in April 2024. source