I’m so dumb, I literally didn’t see the last text line (which explains it). Thanks for the answer, I really have to sleep.

Ohhhhh wow, that looks really amazing! :O

Are you implying people on OnlyFans aren’t good people?!

That’s so uncomfortable omg

I don’t get it :(

because all available history and information basically assured that it was

That’s actually just not true. It’s pretty interesting, but the main reason incumbents have such a high chance of re-election is because exactly this happened with most incumbents that had a low chance already: They got cut out by the party. So there has always been natural cherry-picking that only the “good” incumbents went on to actually be the nominee again (and therefore had a disproportionally high rate of winning).

Although I originally also thought otherwise, when looking at all the data, this was the rational & correct choice.

I don’t get it?

I wheezed when he said that

Maybe it’s not that the neighbours are awful but that the subset of neighbours that use this kind of app is mostly awful.

uh… no?

Maybe it’s cake

You can still use the dog treats if you chose the right person

yes, very :D

That’s such a stupid troll move. I love it.

Fun fact: Polarisierende Sonnenbrillen sind ein in real life - Adblocker (zumindest für die digitalen Bildschirme).

Schön :)

That’s literally the train I use everything I get to uni (and back).

I got

• Registering voters at the abortion clinic
• Registering voters at the LGBTQ club
• Registering voters at the community college and
• Registering voters with grieving families

for democrats