• mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    5 months ago

    Let’s take all that “You can’t POSSIBLY vote for GENOCIDE-adjacent person even if the alternative is LITERALLY A HUNDRED TIMES WORSE INCLUDING LOTS MORE GENOCIDE” energy

    And apply it to “You can’t POSSIBLY sit around typing on the internet while the world is falling apart, let’s get involved in direct activism to make the US a better place instead of hoping that voting is enough which it definitely isn’t”

    While also, yes, voting for “not the end of the world”

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      But if they cosplay as a leftist IRL then their social groups, redcaps all, might see them and ostracize them.

    • Sootius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Hey, Trump was already president for four years, and didn’t do this despite the exact same scaremongering back then. His actions in office were practically identical to Biden’s now.

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    5 months ago

    We need to protect our democracy, as the ability to freely choose between policies is fundamental to the perpetuation of a liberal society.

    On that note, you have exactly one viable choice to make and it will - at absolute best - kick the can down the road for two years. At that point, you will once again be told we need to protect democracy.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      Maybe if you did some collective action between events instead of waiting two years for the polls to open and then complaining that FPTP is still giving you only two choices.

      • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Love this comment! As i commented elsewhere, get outside and make ur local politicians uncomfortable until they pass Rqnked Choice. Plenty of state level measures going around right now, no waiting necessary!

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe if you did some collective action

        That would be crazy if I was doing that regularly.

        I’ll say, five minutes at the Houston Food Bank feels infinitely more productive than an hour waiting for access to the one functional voting machine in my district

    • whoreticulture
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      We have to protect our democracy where there is no choice but to vote for Biden!

    • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      What is the problem with Biden? As a non-American, I only notice how regularly Republicans block everything from the Democrats no matter how big the damage is and somehow the population embarrasses the Democrats for it or specifically biden… i.e. the same action against biden as from republicans or trump and that from the beginning. Why was Biden elected in the first place if both Republicans and Democrats use this to destroy democracy?

      On the subject of genocide… Republicans and Democrats would apparently also be happier if the genocide took place against Israel, then increasingly against Ukraine and against the West. So that democracy in the West is destroyed further and further, especially by the fragmentation of their own shitty population.

      • whoreticulture
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        You have no understanding… Republicans and Democrats both support Israel. You’re clearly very ignorant and I have no idea why you’re being upvoted for this nonsense ahh comment

        • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          When I talk about Republicans and Democrats, I am talking about the population and not just the politicians who represent them. Within the population there are protests etc. that further contribute to destabilization from both sides.

          • whoreticulture
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            🙄🙄 that’s literally a Trump line. don’t speak on something you know nothing about

            • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Well your first post you called me instantly ignorant now comparing with trump… while you ignoring what I wrote first “As a non-American, I only notice” while you ignoring stuff like the campus protest or the whole destabilization etc. But yea call me ignorant…

              • whoreticulture
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yes, you admitted to your ignorance and kept yapping.

                Trump literally said both sides caused deaths at Charlottesville even though it was the white supremacists who were the sole cause of violence. You are ignorant.

                • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You are ignorant even on the 2nd repetition to ignore the fact that I reflect the point of view as a non-American (I never said I was familiar with the political system itself, but I can give my view of what my impression of America is.) . Even better you just absolve Republicans and Democrats of racism which apparently doesn’t exist in your opinion… awesome you just solved the racism problem you genius there is simply no racism in Republicans and Democrats… so simple damn.

  • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    5 months ago

    I get the feeling most of the critics to this post don’t actually live in the US. When it’s you, your family and your friends in danger of being shipped off to the death camps, no amount of philosophical masturbation matters in comparison.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m trans and live in the US, I just also have an actual spine.

      The way people talk about Palestinians today is the way they’ll talk about trans people tomorrow. Based on the logic of lesser-evilism, if the next election comes down to a democrat who wants to genocide trans people, and a republican who wants to genocide trans people and some other group(s), then you’ll deploy the exact same arguments about supporting “lesser genocide.” No one is safe once we accept this logic, at that point it’s all about trying to shift to target onto another group’s back to protect yourself.

      Solidarity isn’t just about doing the right thing, it’s a practical survival strategy. It’s about different groups banding together and recognizing that an attack on one is an attack on all, and that no amount of genocide towards any group is acceptable.

      • Grayox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        5 months ago

        How are you blind to the fact that Republicans currently want to genocide trans folk…

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          5 months ago

          Because they’re delusional. There are some love letters to China in their history. I guess genocide is fine if it’s against Uighurs, huh?

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            objection

            I guess genocide is fine if it’s against Uighurs, huh?

            Do you have any evidence to support this testimony?

            • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              5 months ago

              Get a clue, buddy. “I’m trans and Biden bad, China good.” So you do support genocide.

              The weird part is you think having Donald win will turn the US into communism instead of a capitalist authoritarian hellscape. Or, I suppose you think that will topple America so that “Socialism with Chinese characteristics” can expand across the world?

              Protip, genius: the “Chinese characteristics” are capitalism. They still have billionaires.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                So you do support genocide.

                objection

                Do you have any evidence to support this testimony?

                The weird part is you think having Donald win will turn the US into communism

                objection

                I oppose Donald Trump for the exact same reasons I’ve stated for opposing Joe Biden… because he supports genocide!

                Protip, genius: the “Chinese characteristics” are capitalism. They still have billionaires.

                Hold it!

                Are you saying that you consider Deng’s market reforms to be a right-wing deviation, and that you support hard-line Maoism?

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          objection

          I’m not “blind” to that at all! I’m fully aware of it!

          I’d rather die as someone who opposed genocide, than live as someone who didn’t phoenix-objection-1phoenix-objection-2

          In the long run, if minority groups are being picked off one by one, and Democrats keep following Republicans to the right, then… it’s inevitable that we’ll be targeted sooner or later!

          No one who supports genocide for political expediency will ever have my back! How could it be politically advantageous to stick their neck out for such a small minority? There’s only one way: if different minorities band together and treat an attack on one as an attack on all!

          And that means zero tolerance for genocide!

          • Grayox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Being Complicit with the Genocide of Transfolks IS NOT having Zero Tolerance for Genocide

            Furthermore, Its a hell of alot harder for minorities to band together when they are actively being genocided. Voting for the lesser of two evils allows for that Solidarity to form and expand. Voting will never directly bring about Socialism in America, but voting can give the working class time for Class Conciousness to form that will inevitably lead to that outcome.

            Voting IS NOT a purity test, it is a dirty tool that must be used until other tools can be put in place to allow the workers to seize the means of production.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        5 months ago

        Biden’s lack of action on Israel’s brutal campaign in Palestine is not something I support. And if the public could pressure him to cutting aid and assistance to Israel until they cease and start providing actual care for those displaced and not tent cities I’d be the first in line to support that action.

        But allowing the other guy who actually establish actual concentration camps on the border to illegally detain and abuse refugees that fled hundreds of miles for a chance at a better and honest life is totally unacceptable. All the terrible and worst thing Biden had done in office, and there has definitely been a few, amount to nothing that trump did in a typical week. And that was before he really pursued ideas of being a full authoritarian dictator out to wipe his ass with the constitution and make sure he ruled for life. Trump got more people killed during Covid than Israel’s attempt at genocide. So no, its not disingenuous to say Trunp is dangerous for everybody if he somehow gets back into office and instead of a prison cell where he belongs.

    • LemmeAtEm@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      I live in the US, born and raised. I am queer and a racial minority as well as very politically active. I and everyone I know will be refusing to vote for Biden. He has made nothing meaningfully better since Trump and in fact has made things worse. Regardless of that, I can’t in good conscience vote for someone aiding a genocide. I think everyone who is voting for Biden in the US must be very privileged and unaware or otherwise removed from the effects of the severe decline in living standards under his administration. But even if that weren’t true… he’s aiding a literal mass-child-murder genocide, and by voting for him, I’d feel like I was giving my approval for such a heinous, despicable thing. I wish the democrats had put forward a decent human being that I could vote for, but they didn’t, and I can’t. The US is sliding towards fascism and if you think that won’t keep happening just because the blue team puts their geriatric genocidal guy at the top, I think you’re painfully naive.

      • 20hzservers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ok but do you seriously think trump would have handled Gaza any differently? I think he would have handled it even worse.

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          No way! Surely the fella who kicked off his term with a “Muslim ban” would have saved all the Palestinians! It’s not like he wants Israel to “finish the job” or anything like that. Surely the fella who tweeted nuclear threats against Iran would have been the best choice to have in office when they fired their rockets.

      • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        But would you rather have Trump? Because that’s what will happen if all the people who don’t like either party too much don’t vote.

        • nexguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think they genuinely want Trump and for him cause generational suffering (judge appointments) which in their mind will eventually lead to reforms decades down the road. They are perfectly willing to sacrifice people now for that chance later.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        The US is sliding towards fascism

        Who are you voting for then that will help keep Trump out of office?

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 months ago

          This cosplayer doesn’t want no fascism, they want full fascism. They want another “Muslim ban” and they want Israel to “finish the job.”

          They also want Repubs to pass more laws like banning anything mentioning LGBT from schools. Force teachers who mention anything of the sort to register as sex offenders.

      • Grayox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        The US has done been fascist, its about voting for the fascist that will do the least harm.

  • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    5 months ago

    Then afterwords we pass electoral reform right?

    so people can vote for the candidate that best represents them, with no spoiler effect because their vote is still counted against the republicans. Democrats believe in democracy right?

    • Slowy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 months ago

      The liberal party in Canada campaigned on election reform and then when they got elected said ah actually nah that doesn’t really benefit us sorry

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Then afterwords we pass electoral reform right?

      You wanna guess which party has been amiable towards electoral reform and which has been hostile?

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m guessing both are amiable to reforms that benefit them and oppose those that don’t.

        Allowing reforms which would ditch the two uarty system would hurt both parties. That’s why it will never be implemented by any of them.

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          That’s why it will never be implemented by any of them.

          Yeah that’s why RCV hasn’t seen any progress anywhere in the US recently. /s

        • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Given that both parties are now facing 3rd (4th?) party challenges, it might actually be in their interest to pass RCV. In the short term, it would reduce the spoiler effect, even if has a long term risk of undermining the duopoly.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I don’t trust Dems to believe in meaningful voting choice. I only reluctantly vote for them because they haven’t fully embraced fascism.

      People need to organize in large numbers for electoral reform to make it happen. It is not going to happen if we don’t agitate for it.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I mean almost every implementation of it thus far has been by dems so yes actually that is well within the realm of possibility.

    • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Can’t electoral reform be passed on a state level in the US? I know shit about the US but I heard someone mention that.

    • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      We can do this on the state level! Many states currently have measures establishing ranked choice voting that all of us would do well to pressure our state officials to pass. Id love to see protesters camping out in front of state congresspeoples houses with signs about their local measure. No need to wait until after the election!

      But yes thatd be excellent after November, as well

  • BlackSpasmodic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 months ago
    1. Your vote for president likely doesn’t matter unless you live in one of a few states
    2. The Dems love that they can just scare you into voting against Trump rather than doing things that would excite you to vote Blue
    3. They love you caring more about Trump than Gaza or Cop City or Haiti
    4. There’s WAY more to vote for than President
    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      5 months ago

      rather than doing things that would excite you to vote Blue

      You mean like doubling the overtime exemption salary, reinstituting net neutrality, forcing airlines to refund cancelled flights and banning non-compete agreements in nearly all cases? Because those all happened like, last week. Not to mention larger policies like student loan forgiveness, abortion, etc. that are supported nearly exclusively by Democrats.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is hard to get the news to cover positive things that don’t get people angry, so a lot of people think that the Dems aren’t doing anything.

        The Dems do need to learn how to promote their successes.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Don’t pawn the responsibility of tankies onto an entire political apparatus.

          If tankies can’t think critically, they deserve all the stomps from authoritarian boots they’re licking.

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Counterpoint: the dems wouldn’t have implemented these changes if people weren’t fucking angry at them.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            5 months ago

            With Gaza, I think this is completely accurate (and even then there’s a disconnect between the huge level of outrage and the tiny little concessions to humanity that the Democrats have enacted as a result under that pressure).

            With most things, it’s not. You can’t possibly tell me that sweeping climate change legislation, creating a small amount of support in the tiny minority of people in the US who are aware enough of what’s going on to care, but incurring the anger of the incredibly powerful fossil fuel lobby, was done because of cold political calculus. I think it’s actually borne out of genuine concern (which makes sense – these politicians’ kids and grandkids have to live on the planet in the future too, and they don’t have the Republican luxury of living in a pure fantasy-world where they think somehow that it won’t impact them.)

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think the corporate media specifically doesn’t want to highlight the many small Ls they’ve taken.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        Don’t forget the rejoining the Paris climate Agreement, proposal to lower overdraft fees, and the marijuana rescheduling efforts. But yeah literally nothing good from this administration /s

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        That shit doesn’t get passed when the dems feel safe. Criticising Biden (including the announcement that you wouldn’t vote for him) is how democracy is supposed to work.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          5 months ago

          That shit doesn’t get passed when the dems feel safe.

          The process to properly implement these reforms done via government agencies takes years of public comments (tens of thousands of them, and you have to respond to every one!), review, etc. if you don’t want their effects to just be immediately repealed like many of Trump’s were.

          You’re allowed to criticize Biden, and I am allowed to defend him. Nobody’s censoring you.

        • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          Criticizing? Absolutely.

          Taking the asinine position of completely ignoring the realities of our political and electoral system and thinking that complaining misanthropically on the Internet is, somehow, a more effective means of bringing about change…that is not, in my view, how democracy is supposed to work (not saying this is what you’re doing, just that there’s a lot of that in this thread).

        • BassaForte@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you were actually concerned with democracy functioning how it should, you would vote for Biden and not let Trump win full stop.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I can’t vote in the US, genius.

            And I’m not interested in upholding parliamentary democracy, since I don’t think it’s very democratic at all.

            • BassaForte@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              5 months ago

              Wow, how am I not going to assume that someone commenting on the US election is not from the US? Genius.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                Trust me: If I had the choice, I would gladly never hear a single word about US elections, ever again.

                Unfortunately, I not only have to worry about your so-called country on stolen land slipping down into fascism, but you guys actively enable Israel bombing 40000 palestinians and counting.

      • BlackSpasmodic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Good for you for being informed enough to know about all those things. They’re all good things. But they don’t move my needle. They’re much too small. Probably nothing could compare to a genocide but these don’t come anywhere near close.

        Straight-up student loan forgiveness could’ve been huge. We bailout big companies all the time but Biden fumbled student loan forgiveness by going small. National abortion access would be great but there’s no way they’ll get that passed.

    • Cosmos7349@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Mostly agree, but you be saying #2 like scare tactics isn’t the standard practice for mostly all politicians in every party these days (not even just in the USA, but all around the globe). Trying to make that a trait of a specific party feels kinda disingenuous to me.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Dems got stuck on fear-based politics in 2015 and never recovered.

        This is of course secondary to their primary strategy of fear-based fundraising. They’re a fundraising organization first and foremost. They forgot how to be actual political representatives long before 2015.

      • BlackSpasmodic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You’re right it’s not specific to them. I’m talking about Dems because the thread is about liberals feeling obligated to vote Dem to stop Trump.

        I might argue that using fear to gain/maintain power is a thing that all powerful people/institutions do. It might be a feature of all hierarchical power structures. Anyway, it’s gross every time

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you need anything more than “the other candidate is a fascist running openly on a platform of doing fascism” to do everything you can to vote and get others out to the polls too, you may turn your ally badge in and sit at the table with all the other fascists.

      Formal proposal that all the grammable marches and rallies post security that check for proof of having voted to get let in, sounds like a club bouncer, but these people are coming hard with “bachelorette party at a gay club” energy anyways.

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Tell me you’re a bougeyvik without telling me you’re a bougeyvik.

          If the white left’s chronic inaction doesn’t get us all killed it will be the stress induced aneurysms having to deal with them inevitably causes.

      • BlackSpasmodic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You assume that voting will make a difference but it won’t. Not only because most of us don’t live in swing states but also, because voting doesn’t change American politics. Biden showed us that. Hell, Obama showed us, America is still gonna be it’s ugly self no matter who’s in the oval office.

        I refuse to keep pretending that a blue guy in charge is meaningfully better. They just talk nicer and give the people here a couple more things.

        I want everyone to demand what they actually want, not settle for the guys who seem better than those other douchebags.

        Your proposal is terrible lol

          • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            5 months ago

            Found the white leftist.

            Moghafil, you don’t get to use my people’s plight as an excuse to get out of your bare minimum duty to protect lives with your choices.

            • nature_man@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              This is so much more than just a race issue, its also an LGBTQ and neurodivergence issue, while I may not like Biden, Trump and his crew have both said things and acted in ways that attack basically anyone that isn’t in the in group they deem as worthwhile, republicans have also been pushing forward increasingly hostile anti-trans, anti-abortion laws, and Trump as president would bolster their ability to harm vulnerable groups even more

              I really hate Biden’s unquestioning support of Israel but holy fuck under Trump some of my friends might actually die, and others will lose their rights to be themselves!

              Lets also not forget Trump and his fans pushing for things that could very well spell the actual end of democracy in the US.

              Edit: I didn’t mean to subtract from the race issue, that’s also a big part of it, I simply mean to say that Trump is a massive broad spectrum threat to multiple vulnerable groups across the US

              Also edited because apparently this isn’t readily apparent to some people: under Trump, the genocide of Palestinians will continue, I am very very much against this, the “holy fuck” line is not expressing that I think the genocide of Palestinians is secondary, but is expressing exasperation at the people who constantly insist that the only way to protest is to not vote not seeing the problem with Trump getting into power

              While I’m at it, pretty much whatever the results of the election are, shit will probably hit the fan, I urge everyone to learn first aid, a good start is www.stopthebleed.org

              • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                5 months ago

                And by not voting for him, you’re voting for the guy who gave Netenyahu the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.

                I know damn well who Netenyahu would be voting for if he got the choice, and that’s all you need to know too if you aren’t just a bougeyvik fascist.

                • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  And by not voting for him, you’re voting for the guy who

                  Not how voting works

                  I know damn well who Netenyahu would be voting for if he got the choice

                  probably the guy blocking the International Criminal Court from prosecuting him for documented war crimes

      • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        5 months ago

        Do you think a political party that actively and willfully prepares an opponent for the current elected head of state that belongs to their party could survive for any length of time?

        Of course, it’s worse than that. They clearly want Harris 2028.

        • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Competitive primaries are a feature of any organization democratic enough (in the philosophical sense, not the “Democratic Party” sense). As long as you don’t actively fight for the leadership of the Democratic Party, they are going to continue screwing you and ignore any political demand that isn’t timid enough. Just my two cents as an European.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Because who you can vote for is controlled by wealthy people and corporations that lobby the dominant parties, because the only way to amass that much support to run a campaign is through the Democrats or Republicans. You can’t vote for who you want, you must always pick the lesser of two evils.

      America has never really had proper democracy at the federal level if you can’t vote third party, realistically.

    • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      You have no right to hold this over people’s heads, and even implying a tit for tat arrangement is suggesting that anyone who doesn’t “do more than just vote” isn’t doing their part. Some of us have demanding jobs, kids, family that requires care, or other demands that do not allow time for political activity beyond voting which has already been made extremely difficult in some areas.

      In short: get fucked. Go vote. Don’t try to create some kind of one-upsmanship game that predicates your civic responsibility on someone else’s volunteered time.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is extremely hostile. I was being cheeky. I want people to get more involved as much as other people want me to vote, that’s the point I’m trying to make. I’ll vote, and I don’t need you to try and scare me or shame me about it. Maybe ask yourself why this makes you so upset that you have to swear at a stranger over it. Seems like there’s something else going on that deserves your attention more than my dumb comment

        • ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s intended to be hostile. Maybe you were “being cheeky” (I doubt it) but it doesn’t read that way in a text format and a lot of people making those same statements are not. What makes me so upset about this situation is people like yourself not taking it seriously. We are, without hyperbole, looking at an honest to God threat to democracy and you are making if/then statements about your willingness to vote. Trying to shame people into being more politically active is the wrong way to do it.

          I am tired of people treating this like it’s a game, and I am tired of people being flippant about voting for the lesser of two evils.

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            What makes you think being intentionally hostile toward someone would persuade them to vote? Wouldn’t it make more sense to try and educate? I said I was being cheeky, but even now you can’t resist calling me a liar. I really wish you wouldn’t, you know, I’m pretty easy to get along with, I tolerate other peoples opinions even when they disagree with me. I vote and I do much more than that.

            If anyone is trying to shame, it is this group who descended on me within a 5 minute period with a flurry of down votes and open hostility. I’m genuinely sorry you’re upset about the state of the world, I’m upset too. so why should we try to upset each other more? It doesn’t make sense.

            FYI that isn’t me down voting you. I don’t use down votes.

      • Sootius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        You have no right to hold this over people’s heads, and even implying that someone who does “more than just vote” isn’t doing their part. Some of us have demanding jobs, kids, family that requires care, or other demands that do not allow time for voting instead of attending the occasional local better-timed rally which has already been made extremely difficult in some areas.

        In short: get fucked. Go do activism. Don’t try to create some kind of one-upsmanship game that predicates your civic responsibility on someone else’s volunteered time.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nice of you to assume people who vote don’t do anything else to improve things.

      How will you look back on whatever you’re doing right now if you, and people like you, don’t vote and lead to Trump winning? All that work for nothing because you refused to do the one thing that could help everything else you’re trying to do.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        I didn’t say that, where did I say anything like that? Why are you trying to villainize me? I want other people to get involve as badly as you want me to vote, is the point I’m trying to make. Save your shame and fear. Try talking to me like a person and not, I don’t know, whatever demon you’re trying to make me out to be

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          That’s exactly what you said

          “I’ll vote if you do more than just vote.”

          You’re implying that you know they don’t do more than vote and that implies you assume the same thing of anyone that votes.

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s an incredibly dim interpretation. I just don’t like being constantly lectured to about voting. It is completely valid to criticize this crappy system and yeah I think its okay to suggest that people do a little more than just vote every 2-4 years.

            It seems like people aren’t getting as upset at the idea that I might not vote, as they are at the suggestion that there is some alternative to it, that democracy can be more than voting for one of two deeply corrupt candidates who uphold a deeply corrupt system. I will vote, because its easy.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Get hooked up with Election Science to switch your elections to approval. Pick-all-you-like voting really helps make people feel like they actually got to voice their opinion at the ballot box.

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, actually, everyone urging for pragmatism at the polls should be willing to take steps other than just voting.

      What do you suggest? I’m for this. What are good steps? I want to get from where we are to a voting system that allows me to choose a different candidate without wasting my ballot.

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well, for example, a friend of mine is a big proponent of star voting. He joined DSA, which is an org I’m a member of and how we met, promoted it within the chapter and started holding meetings that actually attract a lot of people inside and outside the group. He networks with other activists around the country who have been successful in implementing voting reforms in their state and municipalities, and Now he is trying to build his own local campaign around Star voting. Its slow, steady political work and it is necessary. Build campaigns and get in front of people, do politics. Not everyone is gonna side with you but if it is a good idea, enough people will.

        And in the temporary absence or inability to do that, educating yourself and others is vitally important work. But groups like DSA, WFP, and various local progressive campaigns have a low barrier to entry and participation. People learn so much so quickly when we get involved. Its not always easy, and for example, I don’t really even enjoy politics all that much, not like some people who seem to love to debate and get a charge out of doing political work. But I’ve met amazing people and learned so much and orgs are desperate for volunteers. My primary focus is movement building and education, and also I seem to have a knack for building bridges. So if that electoral voting work is what interests you, just go for it, reach out to people and most importantly be patient!

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Doubt what? That I’ll vote? Why do you doubt it?

        I just want people to be more politically active so that they learn from experience. For some reason certain people get angry when I do, even if I do it nicely, even if I say please

          • Juice@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Its not conditional, I just want people to be politically active just as much as people want me to vote.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              So my doubts have been confirmed. Glad you fell on the side of voting anyways.

              If you think I’m being ridiculous, I could flip through my history and find a dozen folks who would unironically holdfast to the letter of your original comment.

              • Juice@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                5 months ago

                What do you mean your doubts have been confirmed?

                Look at the other comments on this thread, the incredible hostility my innocuous comment got. So that road goes both ways. If I reacted to the way I got jumped on here, I’d probably set up camp in the not-voting bloc too.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  So is your vote contingent on whether people in this thread demonstrate that they have/will “do more than just vote”? If they don’t, will you abstain from voting?

                  I guess I’m unclear.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      < someone who thinks going to grammable rallies and left signaling online counts as “more than voting”

      • Juice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Going to rallies is good, but I’m actually extremely skeptical of online “activism”. I actually don’t have a benchmark for what " counts as more," but I want people to have actual experience doing political work, which looks different for everyone. I find the most value in the discussions that come from regular working people, educating themselves and each other.

        Why do you want me to be a hypocrite? Do you actually believe that nothing exists beyond the bare minimum? But I remember feeling this deep dark cynicism about politics at certain times in my life too. So hopefully you are on a road that leads you away from cynical otherizing and you discover the communities of volunteers that hopefully exist very close to you, so you are able to have some of these experiences.

        At which point you might look back on these moments of cynicism with disappointment, as I look back on my mine. Its okay though, the system is supposed to instill these feelings of frustration and alienation into people, so it isn’t really your fault. But in order to build a movement we need people doing work they are passionate about and I hope you find work like that and join soon.

      • Sootius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s more than nothing at all. Are you suggesting we should just vote and otherwise lay down and wait for fascism to descend upon us?

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m saying that if you mother fuckers didn’t have to be dragged kicking and screaming to fill a piece of paper out every four years, we’d have never gotten this far with.

          Forget Hillary, Bernie could have won the primary if y’all spent the energy on voting that y’all bring to whining endlessly about how your privilege blinds you to how much it changes for people who need it the most.

      • Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        I would like to stop voting for people who beat me with hammers, personally. I don’t think voting for the guy beating me with a hammer is going to get him to stop beating me with a hammer.

    • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Vote how ya like, but consider using the extra free time to campaign for electoral reform in your state. How we vote is controlled at the state level, so we don’t need to wait for federal reform to do something about First Past The Post voting.

      That way there is a little bit bigger chance a 3rd party more to your liking would be created. Nothing is for certain, but this is our one life so we gotta take the shot.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s never gonna happen and there already is a third party to my liking.

        I will not vote for a candidate I don’t support who’s running on a platform against my interests.

    • kebabslob
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      5 months ago

      Then vote and make your state a swing state. Tf?

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve been voting all my life, silly. This is statistics, not a TV show where the power of believing in yourself magically saves the day.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Ironically the more people that listen to your advice, the less your advice is accurate.

          It’s almost like you’re bait and switching logic for emotional reactionism.

          I’ve seen this play before. Let me guess, you’d say Biden is a genocidal monster singlehandedly genociding Palestine, and also a useless fool who can hardly function, right?

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t think you have the authority to speak on that based on your previous comments.

    • Montagge@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 months ago

      Your vote matters regardless of where you live in the US. City, County, and State elections are extremely important.

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        I never claimed that, the image was talking about presidential elections.

        Unless you live in a swing state, you’re not changing jack with you vote – not without a whole lot of community organizing, something us Americans are just famous for…

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Disregarding the down ballot issues, this is an incredibly myopic viewpoint.

      States change affiliation. It takes time. And a red state that is less red than the previous election? That gets noticed. Policies can shift, slowly. More local offices will be challenged.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    Maybe be mad at the dems for doing literally nothing to get votes rather than people that don’t want to vote for genocide?

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You don’t get the choice of no genocide. You get the choice between some genocide far away, or lots of genocide far away and some more at home.

      I suppose that not voting is a choice, but that choice isn’t “I don’t want genocide”, that choice is “I don’t care how much genocide we have”.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You don’t get the choice of no genocide

        objection

        If genocide is an inevitability, that means that the US is a fascist state which must be overthrown by any means necessary, and any farcical “elections” between two people who support genocide are a joke that should not be legitimized through participation!

        phoenix-objection-1phoenix-objection-2 The fact that you’re defending genocide as an inevitability is, in fact, a perfect demonstration of the harm caused by this very participation! The reason that you’ve taken such an abhorrent position is because you’ve centered the US political system as an immovable object. But the real immovable object should be… STOPPING GENOCIDE!

        If your political project cannot draw a hard line against endorsing genocide, then it is worthless!

    • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      One of two people are going to win. You can have Joe Biden, or you can gamble that Donald “Israel should finish the job” Trump, who kicked off 2017 with an unconstitutional “Muslim ban,” will do a complete 180 this time.

      Protip: it seems to be the lefties who dislike genocide and Trumpanzees have oppositional defiant disorder, so it certainly will not be getting better under Donald.

      It’s fucking weird to pretend you dislike genocide while agitating for an openly racist authoritarian insurrectionist to take office. Like were you asleep for the 20th Century portion of history class or have the middle schools not gotten to that part yet?

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you need anything more than “the other candidate is a fascist running openly on a platform of doing fascism” to do everything you can to vote and get others out to the polls too, you may turn your ally badge in and sit at the table with all the other fascists.

      Formal proposal that all the grammable marches and rallies post security that check for proof of having voted to get let in, sounds like a club bouncer, but these people are coming hard with “bachelorette party at a gay club” energy anyways.

      • lorty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you think supporting genocide is not a fascist position, then I don’t know what to tell you.