Just trying to prove to the base he’s not woke.
Username checks out
Sleepy is the product of much GOP work. Donny needs his own.
Drowsy Don?
Tired Trump?
Comatose comb-over?
“Don’t you think Trump looks tired?”
To paraphrase for this specific situation. When the Doctor says to Alex, “Don’t you think she (Harriet) looks tired.” It’s planting the seed in Alex to question if Harriet is fit to continue being Prime Minister, or if she is ‘too tired’. These 6 words spoken to Alex, Harriet’s Sr. aide, inevitably leads to Harriet’s downfall
I always interpreted this as Alex never telling Harriet, but as she knows something was said, it gnaws away at her confidence until she voluntarily steps down.
I think it’s both. Alex has the idea that Harriet is too tired to continue in her post, and Harriet becomes increasingly paranoid because she is constantly wondering what the Doctor said, and how it was going to end her political career. Since she’s paranoid, she starts acting more and more erratically, which feeds into the ‘too tired’ narrative, and eventually destroys her career.
Domestic terrorist.
We don’t need to give him a cute nickname, call him what he is.
Unfortunately, his base like that he’s a terrorist.
The only way to get them to turn against him is to show them how weak he is.
Which is impossible because his followers don’t actually care about or acknowledge reality
Tuckered out tangerine?
Tapped out tenderloin?
He’s probably a bit too grissly to be a tenderloin. Just a guess.
Snoozy Sex-offender?
Hampered Hamberder
All those sound good. I’m going with Drowsy Donnie lol
comatose comb over 💀
Somnambulant sack of shit.
Benedict Donald
Weary white supremacist?
Fatigued fascist?
Ahh, I know…pooped pussy grabber
Droopy Don
D(on) and D(off)
Snorin’ orange.
Dozy Don
Terrible Twos Trump
Terrorist Trump
Tantrum Trump
Drowsy Donny! That’s what we call him!
deleted by creator
Trump looks so tired, why do they keep forcing him to run?
Low energy, sad!
He looks like he could use a venti covfefe.
Or a hamberder.
Don’t you think he looks tired?
I’m cheering for the big macs
Now I am suddnely afraid what his replacement might look like…
Hes ti’ed…
Maybe they tranqed him to keep his mouth shut
Honestly the best idea a trump lawyer has had in many years.
“We’re doing to inject you with what we’re calling a ‘genius enhancement serum’; it will fortify your already throbbing genius cells and keep you sharp as a tack, ensuring your every response is virtually perfect for your defence in this trial.”
…
😴
I didn’t even think of that as a possibility, but damn that seems more and more likely the more I think about it. The only way to prevent him from repeatedly shooting himself in the foot is to literally drug him into unconsciousness. I completely believe that, I’ve heard him talk before. Hot damn.
Don’t need to tranq him, just didn’t give him his 100mg of adderall.
Interestingly it would quite likely have the opposite effect. Adderall is fairly focused on the executive functioning areas of the brain. If you are dependent on it, and it’s suddenly taken away, then you’ll recoil. The Executive functions help regulate decision making and focus control. Under activity in the executive functioning leads to impulsive behaviour similar to the base symptoms of ADHD.
Take away his drugs, and he will become even more impulsive. He would likely oscillate between sleepy and rage ranting, even more than normal.
Dozy Don and the Despicable Diapers.
There you go world: a new band name for someone to use.
SUNDAY SUNDAY SUNDAY! Dozy Don vs Sleepy Joe in the cage match of the century!
I read your comment and wondered what Provigil was. Modafinil. I guess I should not be surprised they were all on uppers and downers.
If there’s one thing I’m not gonna shit on Trump for, it’s letting his White House hand out pills like candy. Although it’s pretty shitty to do while still enforcing archaic drug laws
The people running your country shouldn’t be drugged out. Yeah, hypocrisy is bad.
Provigil isn’t “drugged out”?
The pills shit has been standard practice at the white house. It only got out of hand under trump.
That’s the picture the media needs to start using.
Maybe a stupid question but how come in a nation of 330 million people, many of them should be qualified, the people are limited to two bad choices?
Has it always been this bad in US presidential elections?
s it always been this bad in US presidential elections?
Nope. I’ve been following politics since Nixon and Biden is the best president we’ve had in the last 50 years.
Carter was pretty good. Got ousted from his boat by a rabbit, but he was still a decent president.
If you want to see some great Republican hypocrisy, read up on Carter and his beehives. They made a huge deal about what a national security risk him selling honey and how he needs to divest from it, but then let Diaper Don slide right in by.
The problem is the first past the post system which heavily encourages a two-party outcome. A ranked choice system would drastically improve the chances of new candidates or parties to emerge with meaningful results.
But since that hurts the current holders of power, it’s pretty unlikely to be enacted anytime soon.
Because the people don’t choose their options, just from the options chosen for them. The rich are one team, and our options are just to give us the illusion of choice and to pit us against each other as if it were left v. right and not haves v. have-nots. Notice the options are always deeply rooted in the “haves” camp…
From the outside looking in (not American, but Canada has similar problems) it looks transparently theatrical. But then I look around in Canada with that same “outsider” perspective and, yeah, it’s just as bad here. Our Premier of Ontario is a slightly less embarrassing version of Trump. Claims to be “for the people” but gives little-to-no fucks whatsoever based on his actions.
Anyway… Ready whenever others are to burn this all down…
To be blunt, do you genuinely believe that the population of the US is capable of agreeing on better candidates?
If so, again to be blunt, how many people would it take to sway this decision, and why can’t this number of people strategically ensure that their candidate is chosen?
Admittedly, I’m old enough to remember when Digg tried to make Ron Paul a thing, and when that went hilariously wrong, they shifted to Obama and made out that he was their candidate all along. I’m not saying that it’s easy, but mainly trying to say that I imagine that it’s actually quite difficult to get 300m people to agree on anything that isn’t an incredible compromise.
Not this bad but yeah
There’s actually a lot more bad choices but you never know about them because nobody cares.
Hey everybody! I know how to wake him up!
Love ya, Squid. I know we can always count on you to deliver the trombone when it’s relevant. I love seeing that in here.
I do my best.
can you be held in contempt for sleeping during a trial?
You’re not really required by law to ‘pay attention’ unless you’re being asked a direct question. Though, I’m sure judges look poorly on such things.
I remember Harvey Weinstein doing the same thing before he got sent to Rikers. :)
Not if you are not required to participate in that part and not causing a disturbance in the court.
This is a jury trial, and jurors are watching. Even during selection. If you don’t care enough to stay awake, it’s not a good impression.
Probably wouldn’t fly. This happens more than you’d think. Court room procedures aren’t as riveting as tv would lead us to believe.
I’ve heard of jurors getting in trouble for it before, but not defendants.
jurors can get in trouble for it? it’s a bodily function and they are almost volunteers. I mean I can see them getting dismissed or maybe being asked if they are ok and to please try and pay attention, but I hope you don’t mean real trouble.
They are entirely responsible for determining the facts of the case. The defendant can face dramatic penalties on their decision. The cannot sleep through it.
oh. now I understand. death penalty for nodding off jurors! I won’t try and get disqualified when they add that.
There are quite a few bodily functions we are expected to control in public, with real legal consequences if we can’t. Falling asleep while driving, or (intentionally) dropping a deuce in the jurrybox during trial as some quick examples.
erections? peeing your pants? farting? there are no legal consequences to any I can think of. maybe if you do them intentionally, there are indirect consequences, but we aren’t talking about grabbing a pillow and setting up for a nap in the jury box here. just nodding off.
edit: aha I see you made an edit with examples. no fair
Nod off while driving and let me know the police feel about it.
ur just silly. No one is asking you to drive in that situation. even then, you haven’t broken the law and there are no direct consequences. if you hit someone else, there are indirect legal consequences. that wasn’t totally bad though, any other examples?
Ahh, my mistake. I thought we were discussing this in good faith. I’ll let you continue to be intentionally obtuse on your own now.
https://archive.ph/yBD3H View freely. :)
Drowsy Defunded Don was right there…
But using his own term against him is always best.
