Where was the outrage for Laura Croft?

There wasn’t any.

People are just getting their panties in a bunch because culture war.

It’s Poe’s law.

Nyet

Yes,

I use arch BTW.

Yeah my goal was wired for this reason.

I’ve worked on Bluetooth as a developer and good lord it needs to burn in a fire.

That question is what brings me here!

I’m thinking of doing a soundbar and subwoofer in the living room, sound bars alone in each bedroom and some bookshelf speakers in other rooms

deleted by creator

I’m not sure I call banning hijabs in all public service roles in the name of “secularism” isn’t a great start…

https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/here-s-how-people-are-reacting-after-bill-21-was-upheld-by-the-quebec-court-of-appeal-1.6789650

It misses where apple brought back audio and magsafe

Audio is valid, but apple brought back magesafe.

EDIT my 3 year oldacbook pro has bothagsafe and 3.5mm audio.

It’s not that violence is never okay, it’s more a tool in the tool chest that has its uses.

Well likely need violence to redistribute wealth yes, but violence is more than physical and still involved in community policing. But the difference is it’s mean to serve the community, not hold them in check.

There’s a fine line to draw between letting people self govern and ensuring the safety of peoples.

But again, this is up to communities to decide what is best. Sometimes violence and intervention are necessary. But those tools are reserved for extremes.

It’s not that you can trust it a little, it’s that you can’t trust it ever. It’s just saying want it thinks you want to hear, not what is true.

You know asking AI is asking to be lied to yes?

Like, Apple has gone so far as to say it’s impossible for current LLMs to reason.

It’s incapable of knowing what is true in it’s current form according to apple.

Don’t trust AI to actually know anything.

Except devices, specifically quoting routers, Do make up bot nets

That’s the specfici malware used on unsecured IoT devices and routers.

I was able to find tons of scholarly articles Like this one

That specifically talk about how many of these devices get comprised.

This isn’t some theoretical attack vector. This is active now.

The risk of taking down large portions of the internet has the same risks as a vacuum? Interesting.

Your right not every device has parts availability. But again, why not? Because it it’ll cost more?

Your willing to risk tanking the digital economy for what has historically been huge sums of money, because we don’t hold vacuum cleaners to higher standards?

I’m being obtuse, but you keep pointing to “well we don’t fix that problem over there, so we shouldn’t do it over here”. It doesn’t sway me. We should absolutely fix repability of ALL ELECRONTICS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

We do take cars that fail safety inspections off the road. You are correct, we don’t hold them to higher standards, but that’s not a reason why we also shouldn’t remove genuine hazards off the roads.

If a car is far more likely to kill someone, it shouldn’t be on public roads either. Just like devices that can’t be update don’t belong on public nets. The risk to the broader public is to big IMO.

Software 100% needs to be included in support.

Old devices that become vulnerable but still accessible on the internet, eventually become part of bot nets producing DDOS and other network attacks.

You think spare parts don’t cost money? Wearhouse space is expensive. Massive part stores have to be made. That’s all expense needed to take on by auto manufacturers. Why would software be different?

Either that or they keep all the tooling, which again is expensive. And people need to know how to use the tooling too.

This isn’t a “it’d be nice” kind of patch. This is exactly how we get massive bot nets for DDOS attacks. Devices become vulnerable, scans go out on the internet looking for devices they can exploit, and when they do, they gather bot nets.

It’s also not creating something new. It’s fixing your shit. They don’t have to create the entire software stack from scratch, just fix the exploit. If they can’t reasonably do that, then these devices need to be taken offline.

This is why a number of countries have laws saying spare parts must be made available for a number of years past being sold. Well beyond what the warranty is.

How is this significantly different?

We build real community. That’s the answer to all of it.

If we all feel we own the park, we’ll start taking care of it more. Rather than it being the cities (i.e. someone else’s) problem.

How do we give land back? We decide as a community to do that.

Also, land back isn’t about ownership, it’s about stewardship. If we were community focused, we’d understand that, and maybe even participate in it.

How do we do justice? We let community decide what’s best.

Fuck these countries. We should be caring and looking out for our neighbours. Not these nation states.

How do we deal with wealth redistribution? Support community. Spend as local as you can. Give your wealth to community.

It’s not about heorarchy, it’s about being mutually invested in eachother. Not just “friends”, not just hanging out, but sticking through tough times. Calling out BS. Trying out best to bring our the best in eachother.

Giving power to people is not the same as democracy. People have a right to be governed however they want to be. If a community wants a king, sure. That’s their right as a people. There’s a difference between intervening on something like a genocide, and imposing democracy on a people that don’t want it.