• wholookshere
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s almost like you can delist it in such a way you prevent people from paying money for a broken game with no intention of updating it again, and still leave it for people who currently have copies.

    Wow that was such a garbage take.

    • wick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yea it’s pretty garbage. No mention of MS having culpability for breaking it. Just blame the victim and sweep the game under the rug.

      • wholookshere
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So what, you think they shouldn’t be reviewed bad for a broken game?

        No, it’s broken and shouldn’t be for sale if they’re not going to fix it.

        Guess what, as a mobile dev, my job is to fix the broken shit on multiple OSs as well. It’s the territory.

        • wick@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I think MS should fix it, that’s my only position. I don’t care what Ubisoft does because they didn’t break it. Their reputation can only improve from this set of facts. Doing nothing is a neutral act, and developing a patch is a positive.

          Idc about your buggy checklist app.

          • wholookshere
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 minutes ago

            Ubisoft isn’t the victim here, consumers buying broken games are.