• southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    235
    ·
    9 months ago

    Do people really not remember that it was also boomers protesting vietnam and working in the civil rights movement? Or that plenty of people born after that voted for trump, and will again?

    Three intergenerational fake fight is dumb, and it prevents any real attempt at unification to fight against a real enemy: fascism.

    Fucking idiots, the whole fucking human race.

    • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      9 months ago

      The counter culture was called a counter culture because it was a minority. Even of the boomers.

      The intergenerational fight is dumb, but if you’re talking generalisation and joining in, most boomers weren’t hippies.

      They conformed and are still complaining about those who don’t conform. Just as they complained about hippies then they complain about zoomers now.

      • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        9 months ago

        I wasn’t exclusively talking about hippies, there were other counter culture groups and movements.

        But the thing I think you missed is that even if most baby boomers weren’t hippies and protesters, all of the hippies and protesters were boomers.

        It isn’t a generational issue at all, it’s a human issue, where you have people that fall into loose groupings of motivations and thinking, which seem to be either “nature”, or carried across generations over time. Some people, likely the majority, will be the conformists, and the rest fall into varying degrees of heresy.

        There are plenty of baby boomers and later generations (us gen x old fucks are old fucks now too) that don’t sit around bitching about “kids today”.

        Some of the baby boomer resistance got worn out and stopped fighting to some degree, but that’s totally different than the entire generation just becoming conformist.

        Truth? People are just idiots in general, and every generation has them. But until you spend time really hanging around a given generation, you only see and hear the loudest of them. I spent two decades of my life taking care of the elderly and dying. You ended up running into a big cross section of baby boomers and older generations doing that during the nineties and early noughts.

        That’s part of the problem. Most of us never get a chance to get paid to sit and listen to someone. We only hear the tiniest sliver of a generation. Even with my hundreds of patients to listen to, that’s still a tiny sliver, it’s just bigger than most people get. All that usually happens is you get access to family and whoever is in the news/talk show circuit. Online, you tend to only get the extreme ends of things being the loudest.

        It isn’t a generation issue at all.

        • Ross_audio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          When a large generation is voting to block progressive change it is a generational issue on the macro scale.

          I am fully on board with the idea that shouldn’t lead to discrimination on age, shouldn’t lead to assuming all boomers are the problem.

          Nor that all those younger are progressive.

          But politically it is a generational issue. When talking about politics it is legitimate to talk about demographics and voting blocks and how we might get them on side. Or at least prevent them doing further damage.

          Obviously my side is primarily the “stop wrecking the planet” side with a healthy dose of “poverty and homelessness are a stain on any developed nation”. So boomers voting the way they do is a problem and has been for some time.

          They are yet to stop voting in people who make the world worse. That generation is still a problem. It has been since the 70s.

          Either we get enough of that generation to change direction or, more likely, we have to out vote them.

        • JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          wait, it’s like not a generational issue, and isn’t using generation as a shorthand for specific demographics still useful in everyday language? how else would you refer to such a group of individuals, i’m drawing blanks.

          • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m saying it isn’t about when you were born, it’s about how you think.

            The demographics don’t matter because every generation has the same basic humanity within it.

    • Morcyphr@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      9 months ago

      Ahh, the voice of reason. All ____ are ____ (fill in with your favorite stereotypes). Then, us serfs fight amongst ourselves, oblivious to what’s really going on.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        A significant number of serfs dream of lording over their peers, just like, or worse than, the current lord. Those are the perfect, disposable tools for the oppressors, little promises go a long way.

    • TeenieBopper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Nah, it was still the WW2 generation that fought for Civil rights. The Boomers were in elementary school in the 50s and only the oldest could even vote in 1963, 1964, and 1968.

      But once all the Boomers could vote, who got elected? Reagan. So fuck them.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hating on boomers has been popular on the internet for over a decade now.

      Before that, young millenials and gen z wouldn’t even know what the term boomer referred to.

      And now they just use it to mean anyone who is older than them. 40 year olds are boomers to them.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh “baby boomer” has been a term for a long time. Probably since history and social sciences started categorizing generations. My point is young people on the internet were not using it as a blanket term for anyone over 30 or 40 years old.

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            No they were using it to denote a generation of people born after WW2 who have had everything given to them in life and destroyed it afterwards so nobody could benefit from it anymore.

            Basically the selfishness of the Me-generation

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I mean, the oldest zoomers were 17 a decade ago, and most were significantly younger. So yeah, I guess a lot of them wouldn’t know what “boomer” meant, but what of it?

    • macrocarpa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Completely agree, but mate half the fun is watching generations gradually understand the multi layered perfection of life stage related Simpsons clips.

      Oh BTW everyone you’re due to listen to cat Stevens father and son again to see if it has changed meaning

  • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    146
    ·
    9 months ago

    a global generation that won’t be storming any beaches or cities would be a blessing for the world

    imagine a generation in russia that just keeps doing what they do instead of listening to an old psychopath in Moscow who decides that it would be “good” to send hundreds of thousands to their deaths to bring death and destruction to millions of others

    being peaceful is not a shame!

    • OpenStars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah but… they seemed to not have realized that it would be THEM being used as cannon fodder. They thought they could just reap the benefits without having to lift a finger. It was going to be “repeal and then replace”, and then once they swallowed that line, it reeled them in when it was too late to pull back.

      i.e. they were promised peace - the territorial expansion was only supposed to last 3 days and that hardly counted in their eyes - and did not realize that by having elected Putin, it was already too late.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Song

      Translation

      How much years unending

      Slaughters inhumane

      On children fall from sky

      Bombs as bunch of anger

      Tanks’ place is in museums

      Let them quietly rust there

      Body of mother is scarred

      Warriors’ place is in romance

      Wars are not glory

      Groans in bloody mess

      Tears, dirt on uniform

      Wars don’t have a place in the world

      Tanks’ place is in museums

      Let them quietly rust there

      In tales of old empires

      People don’t belive anymore

      “Homo homini lupus est” is what we said when

      Voice of reason was silent in world and war raged everywhere

      When lives were worthless, people were seen only as soldiers

      And entire world was turning to burning hell

      Why didn’t we become smarter Isn’t it’s time already

      To understand as a matter of fact that more important

      For hammer of war to stop clutter

      Tanks’ place is in museums

      Let them quietly rust there

      Even as toys

      Kids don’t need to know them

  • Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’d be willing to be that if there were an existential military threat, the zoomers would indeed find it in them to storm the beaches of Normandy.

    I hope they storm the metaphorical beaches of climate change and economic inequality

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      9 months ago

      No need to storm the beaches of Normandy we have the channel tunnel now. You can take a train, it’s much easier.

    • FrowingFostek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t paint but, the imagery of zoomers “storming the beaches of economic inequality” gives me inspirational energy I haven’t had in a while. Thank you.

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m realizing that there is no way we are getting the genie back in the bottle on generative art… But you can also definitely tell the difference between when it’s just pure generated vs being used to help develop an art piece but a fair amount of work still went into it to fixing it up and styling the composition.

            It’s not much but I think it’s still a place to draw the line while trying to support actual artists and maybe push those that want to generate to still put effort in past rolling the dice a bunch.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      And the worst part is forgetting that Boomers did their best to avoid going to war, just like any person would. In fact, it got so bad and so many people were going to jail or becoming Canadian exiles by avoiding the draft that Jimmy fucking Carter had to issue a general amnesty for all citizens.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      Being “toughened up” is far more important than being a happy, well adjusted, compassionate person.

      …for the conservative mindset. It’s like making things worse for other people, even if it hurts you just a little bit, is worth it because it still elevates your position relative to theirs.

      Though they do often shoot to the other side of the spectrum, sheltering kids from learning about important facets of the real world at an appropriate age. Maybe for religious reasons.

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Finding happiness within yourself by realizing your ideal sense of self goes against everything conservatives believe. They think life is about hatred, and winning at all costs.

        You can’t just be happy and content with who you are, you have to chase happiness at the end of a crucifix, gun, and credit card. Pick your poison so long as you’re spending and supporting division. Anything else would collapse their true religion of capitalism.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Once I first read about the three poisons in Buddhism (essentially hatred, greed, and delusion) it seemed so simple and obvious. Then of course I noticed those obviously bad things in every shitty news story about the world.

            • Zink@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              For the three poisons, not really. Just DuckDuckGo it and see if you find a rabbit hole follow.

              Their approach to meditation also helps with being able to analyze your internal thoughts almost like a third party. The monk this video explains it about half way through, but I liked this whole video. I find him super easy to listen to.

              https://youtu.be/c1gY7RWE48U

              And around the same time I read some stoic philosophy. Marcus Aurelius is probably the first name you’ll run across. The really basic explanation is that things can only bother you if you let them, and it is within your power to improve your internal state without having to change the external world around you.

              There is a common theme among both philosophies, essentially being more aware and in control of your own mind.

              I am not religious about this stuff or anything. I’m a computer nerd atheist just like most of the people here. But using techniques and skills that markedly improve my life is what I’m gonna do regardless of who wrote the instructions.

              Edit to add: I don’t mean to suggest this is the silver bullet either. It took medication and therapy too. It’s a lot easier to make progress on yourself if your mind hurts less.

      • Sharkictus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not even religious, I’ve known people yell at their pastor for mentioning death exists, using the word virgin in context of Mary.

        Toxic positivity, and love of power. I have also known of pastors who got threatened by their congregation for quoting the Bible where it says don’t exasperate your children. These people wanted to throw hands with God for daring tell them how to raise their kids and they can’t just treat them as thing to dominate over.

    • kaffiene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      “Never again” Oh… I meant never again for us, or like, white ppl. Genocide for brown peeps is cool.

    • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s all fun and stuff until the aliens come and invade us, catching us with our pants down after a millennia of peace. No, we must prepare ourselves to face the horrors that lurk in space and if we have to keep training against ourselves, so be it. /S

  • root_beer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    9 months ago

    This A+ civics genius over here seems to be forgetting all the millennials that went to Iraq and Afghanistan, and when we (the US government) inevitably set up another meat grinder overseas, then there will be a bunch of “today’s youth” getting killed over there just like she wants. Christ.

    • JohnDoe@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      it’s fair, wouldn’t you say that the breadth of the campaigns in number of deaths and artillery/air support kinda make normandy different enough?

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    9 months ago

    Also can’t imagine any of them holding a sword high while charging their horse into a wall of pikemen.

    War changes. Normandy was 80 years ago. We had just invented duct tape.

      • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nah, they’ll just attack our infrastructure, the ones still running Windows XP. Power plants, emergency services, financial institutions, government, hospitables.

        Don’t bee too surprised, to this very day out government is attempting to protect from attacks like this and carrying out very similar attacks on other countries.

  • stoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ironically, Vietnam was Baby Boomers’ avocado toast. Their parents were happy to keep shipping their children off to die so that politicians wouldn’t look weak in front of the public. Remember that students were murdered at Kent State over daring to exercise their First Amendment rights.

    Somehow those people STILL, as a generation, became gigantic shitbags who destroyed the world for their own personal gratification.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    A lot of boomers dont realize they lost the Vietnam war.

    My dad was shocked to learn that the communists won, when I told him a couple years ago.

    • Flumpkin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      My dad was shocked to learn that the communists won

      Even that is distorted - the Vietnamese people won under incredible hardship. Simple farmers, hundreds of thousands simply refused to bow to imperialist rule. They were helped, but they did the fighting.

      But you can also argue that the US did “win” the war or at least their objectives. The objective was to stop the domino effect of socialism and they absolutely brutally devastated Vietnam for many decades. And that was their objective, to punish anyone who dares to redistribute wealth.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    9 months ago

    Judging by US politics nowadays and their behaviour in regards to both Israel’s genocide in Gaza and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the average boomer would’ve sided with the Nazis.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s because they collectively have the political intelligence of a concussed pigeon.

      They go on and on about freedoms and their freedoms and their freedoms to have guns and in the next sentence endorse Trump a man who if he had his way would invite fascism into the country. Presumably their guns would be taken off them at that point. Since fascism with an armed population rarely works out.

      But none of them realize this because that’s like three steps down the line, and they’re still struggling to think about step one.

      • TheMonkeyLord@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I am actively convinced that the boomer generation, and a chunk of the gen x gen, all had their development heavily and substantially impacted by the egregious use of lead throughout america, plus the waves of radiation that wafted over half of the country because of nuclear testing

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why do people say zoomers are super liberal?

    Look at music now; it’s materialistic and conformity. The punk scene is a minority, rap being about the struggles of life is a minority

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      9 months ago

      Zoomers lean more left than previous generations, in larger quantities and as a percentage, even including increased far-right zoomers as compared to previous generations.

      Modern pop music being materialistic and conformist is just the music industry, there’s tons of anticapitalist modern punk if you look for it.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          You’re just repeating what I said and misinterpreting the statistics. Gen Z is far more radical on both ends, but the median Gen Z person is more to the left than previous generations. Gen Z is not more conservative overall, just the fringe end is more fascist.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            But the stats don’t put them further left than millennials

            If we only focus on the left then we have 56 thinking it’s man made for millennials and 54 for Zoomers. So where do you get more left from?

            If we say it’s margin of error and they are the same then where do you get more left from?

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              9 months ago

              More radicalization on both ends, like I said. If the average conservative millenial isn’t as insane as the average conservative Gen Z, it can give you the illusion that there are more.

              Easy enough.

      • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        But the “leaning more to the left” comes from “you promised and didn’t deliver so fuck you” place. And it’s not only young people. We’ve been told for decades that “If you work hard you’ll succeed”, you have to defend your country so your country can help you when you need it" and shit like that. But those are lies the upper class tells everyone else.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well, sure, but I’d say radicalization increasing on both ends is more because of the general decay of Capitalism. As Capitalism gets increasingly fucked, people seek answers, and while the general trend is to the left, there are also more fascists.

      • bier@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s actually now true, at least where I live. The girls tend to be more left leaning while the boys tend to be more right leaning.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          The difference between genders on political affiliation is small, but present, yes, but overall the trend is to the left.

          • bier@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That’s not really what I mean.

            Look I turned 40 a few months ago an a few weeks ago I got a newspaper subscription, somehow I turned into my father…

            Anyway, a few days ago I was reading this article and it was about (Dutch) GenZ (I want to say kids but adults is probably also true).

            The article was about how the GenZ girls are mostly left and pretty far left. Old people will probably describe them as woke.

            But what was pretty interesting (and maybe scary) to me is that a lot of the GenZ boys are pretty conservative. Lots of them follow “alpha male” influencers and lots of them even really like Andrew Tate. They sort of believe in this alpha get money and girls mindset. They have some graphs about other countries, where in south Korea it had the biggest gap between boys on the right and girls on the left.

            I just looked it up (my newspaper also can be viewed digitally)

            It’s in Dutch but its probably understandable (mannen are males, vrouwen are females).

            This is the source but it’s dutch and behind a paywall

            http://digitalekrant.trouw.nl/trouw/2101/article/1987524/34/1/render/?token=0ba4dd5e64ebc6c01e4705ca84dbe8c9&vl_app_id=be.persgroep.red.mobile.android.trn&vl_app_version=19.1.0&vl_platform=android

            This is the head of the image translated

            Political gap between young men and women has grown In many countries, young men (18-29) have become more conservative in recent years, while young women have become more progressive. Score: the percentage of progressive minus conservative young adults, based on various long-term studies.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      9 months ago

      Since when do musical lyrics irrevocably dictate political party affiliation?

      This isn’t a binary choice.

      By your standards those that listen to country music would actually give a shit about this country and their fellow person while driving trucks and drinking beer. They only get the last two.

    • sanpedropeddler@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s because people figured out a formula to make the most widely accessible and profitable music possible. Its a process that isn’t exclusive to music or gen z, and I fail to see how its relevant.

      • kofe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well we’re also seeing a trend of younger men falling for the manosphere type bullshit. It’s a weird divide. Lots of younger people in general are leaning more into socialism, too. But yeah sweeping generalizations either way aren’t representative of reality

    • sheogorath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Pretty much. Look at most countries around the world. In South East Asia, in the Philippines and Indonesia the Gen Z just reelected their dictators.

        • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well for one you said it’s a minority, as if that’s a bad thing. When that’s what punk is, a minority art movement that breaks the rules of the establishment. Until it becomes the establishment.

          It’s also not just a bunch of kids plinking away at guitars. Look at the PC Music label and hyperpop in general, that’s punk.

          Nor does it need to be filled with angst and lyrics with the subtlety of a brick to the bullocks.

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        Nah, people just hate you and your twisted view of the world. If a zoomer is a Karen then every other generation are Nazis.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        I really don’t want to see your answer, but as a rhetorical for your own purposes, you should have defined what a “Karen Generation” is. That will mean something different for everyone.

          • stoly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            More like asking what the heck they are talking about. They don’t specify, it’s just generalized anger.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 months ago

    Today’s youth are fighting in Ukraine just fine. She probably thinks it’s character forming, having never once done anything remotely like that herself.

  • OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Could of named Desert Storm? Or is that Gen X? Ether way older folks have been labeling the next generation as inept since the beginning of time but were still here long after they die.

    • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some tail end boomers may have fought in Desert Storm but that’s primarily Gen X.

      Then millennials took over since then, and Gen Z joined us in the last decade.

      The Boomers had Vietnam … and I guess thought it was so fun they decided to make it worse for all their kids and grandkids

    • OpenStars@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Of COURSE we’re inept - we’re inexperienced. What, did you think we were going to spring out of the womb fully ready to run all of society!?

      And even then, how da fuq did we manage to surpass them in knowledge of like every subject imaginable - not just computers/technology but climate change, abortion rights, and most everything else besides?!

      Maybe sitting on the couch/sofa isn’t the best way to learn how the world works? Although I could do it, with just a phone in my hand…

      But many will vote for tRump anyway, while yelling at me for being “inept”, even as I vote to keep their Social Security and Medicare going that keeps them alive and relatively healthy. Though their happiness is still up to them, so maybe turn off the Faux News that just tells them to be sad 24/7.

      But - and this is crucial - many old people will vote for Biden, even while many younger people will vote for tRump, bc while this whole age division thing does exist, it’s irrelevant and meant to distract us from the class warfare division that actually does matter.

    • pachrist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      9 months ago

      We absolutely won the war on terror in Afghanistan.

      Osama bin Laden tried to show that he was the scariest terrorist, and the US military took that personally and wasn’t willing to give up the crown. So, for a decade before his death, and a decade after, we spent trillions of dollars to make sure that a bunch of nice, lovely shepherds would shit themselves with fear if they’re at a wedding or funeral and hear the sound of an airplane in the distance.

      The goal was to make the most terror right? Did I move the goalposts enough that the US still wins?

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Blaming societal woes on the boomers (or any generational group) is boring. Yes, it’s cute when old people can’t do basic things, but if you let your attention be drawn away from the super rich, you got played like a fiddle.

    • asteriskeverything@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Nah fuck that they got theirs then pulled the ladder up behind them while blaming us for all the problems that they created and voting against any progress.

      I mean yes ultimately it is a class war but this generational shit is not nothing. And for many of us it is a genuine coping mechanism with having That Kind of Boomer(s) in our life.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      As long as old people vote to take away rights and the majority of politicians are from that generation, I’ll keep blaming them since it is easier.

      • Luke@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Who do you blame when younger people vote that way? The entire generation they happen to belong to, or is there a more nuanced analysis for that situation and not the other?

    • ThatFembyWho
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not that it proves anything, but both my (boomer) parents have apologized for being a selfish generation that left us a fucked up world. They were both right-leaning too.

      So, at least some of them recognize a difference in opportunity and quality of life between their generation and subsequent ones, and feel remorse over it.