• ram@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wish YouTube would just remove it. Tired of platforms being like “wow that’s awful, wanna see more?” Just get rid of it, get rid of her, get rid of the lot of them.

      • ram@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        The profit motive has resulted in a number of huge problems with youtube. Quite honestly I think it’s unwise to leave such a wealth of information in a capitalist’s hands.

    • BR0QM@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Whether it’s YouTube, Twitter or Reddit, all corporations that make their profits from advertising on the back of UGC have the same systemic failure in their calculus.

      There’s a monetary incentive to provide a platform to hate. There isn’t one to deplatform it.

      • coderofhonor@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Is the profit motive the only issue here? IIRC YouTube leadership was forced to speak at congress hearings because the gov suspected them of biasing against conservative viewpoints.

  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    i’m under no pretenses Youtube is ever gonna give a fuck and do consistent things about this kind of content but it’s always fun when one of these people faces any consequences for posting it

  • BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    for every one of these that gets demonatized, 50 activist videos get demonatized for calling them out.

    • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 years ago

      you take what you can get with youtube honestly, i’m shocked they even punished that at all since it was probably great traffic for them

  • Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    ‘May be’? Just say it is.

    Its good that theyre doing this though, hopefully this isnt a one off instance of demonetizing such things (or better yet unlisting or removing it)

  • whop42
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    honestly, they should either moderate it consistently or just not moderate it at all

    • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 years ago

      no, i think still think it’s “good” if they selectively moderate it–as far as i’m concerned all of these people can get fucked–i just think it’s substantially better if they consistently do so. but i’m not about to point out the inconsistency when it’s beneficial to queer people lol