If lemmy.world finds this, please tell my starving children that I love them.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    10 months ago

    But have you thought about the shareholders and the executives? They are the ones that really have it bad!

    If only those lazy poor people worked harder and pulled themselves up by this bootstraps.

    It’s not like we systemically work towards keeping them poor so we can have the power!

    Last quarter my 401k dropped by 0.3%! IM THE VICTIM HERE

    • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair when you have that much money 0.3% is a lot of money (for a poor person)

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        they still have so much they wouldn’t miss it if there wasn’t a number on his balance telling him he lost money.

        imagine how much 0.3% of some billionaire asshole’s money could help rebuild people’s lives.

        • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          My response was sarcastic, but also accurate, and yes that tiny bit could do a whole lot of good

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      We can’t let the elites got taxed too hard. What if I finally win a lottery and join the elites? My wealth would be sucked dry by the excessive tax!

  • Conyak@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m in my 40s and I honestly still don’t understand the appeal of the GOP to the average American. I have never seen them put forth a policy that does not seem to be shitting on one group or another. What has the GOP done in the last 40 years to make the average citizens life better?

    • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      shitting on one group or another

      That’s the whole point. They’re the party of oppression, and the people that follow that party believe that those groups should be oppressed.

    • Traister101@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s the interesting thing they don’t. They typically do the best they can to make lives worse for their constituents and they’ll be happy about it as long as the “others” are getting fucked over more than they are.

    • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      That they hate some of all the other people the consevative voters hate, and they are happy to starve if the group they hate starve too.

      It is a stupid premise I know, but you can see posts about evil things the gop does, and somehow “centrists” find a way to blame the democrats for that.

      • words_number@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think that is actually true. The average poor republican doesn’t want to be wealthy, if that would mean that would also become more wealthy or have more rights. This also applies to other political subjects. I mean a poor republican who works a terribly paying job with no worker rights or healthcare would actively vote against politicians who say they’d want to change that situation, just to make sure that underage girls that got raped are forced to give birth to their unwanted childs they then can’t provide for.

        • badaboomxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          It is sad, but I also agreed with that.

          Not sure why they are like that but as long as the ones they hate also suffer the conservatives are ok.

          But they never stop to see an alternative where anyone has to suffer.

      • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Its partly like that but its MORE so that they are utterly convinced that all thier troubles including that they are poor is some other groups fault, and even when they do have doubts they are unable to express them without fear of losing thier status in thier in-group. So they will keep on voting against thier own interests and blaming the wrong people for the results.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    10 months ago

    If you don’t let people starve. They’ll learn to be lazy and it’ll be the downfall of our society! /s

    we should also get rid of the inheritance tax so I can make sure even more generations of my family will never need to work and be lazy! /s

    • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes we need the society to look like Hercule Poirot’s England where you had to wait for your uncle to die, or help them on the way, to get some inheritance.

  • nighty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    10 months ago

    When I feed the poor, they call me a saint, but when I ask why the poor are hungry, they call me a communist. - Hélder Câmara, an archbishop

  • Lath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    Commie. The poor will just trade the food for drugs, might as well throw it away as trash and shoot anyone that gets near it.

    • EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Walmart is that you?!?!

      Source: I used to work at Walmart and they threw away so much stuff and locked it in a dumpster with constant surveillance

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 months ago

        You’re right, but on the other hand, no one in the 1980s watched Married With Children and thought, “a shoe salesman? With a house? How absurd!” Because houses were affordable.

        • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          housing used to be affordable. I’ve seen the value of the modest house i grew up in increase in value after my parents sold it so much that I can’t afford to even think about buying it now that i’m the age they were when they bought it. and it looks like the new owners have let it go to shit.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            Exactly. People did talk about how homes on TV in the 1980s were unreasonably large, but the idea that Al Bundy’s family or Roseanne’s family couldn’t have a house at all was not even one people considered. Because of course you could afford a house.

            • bouh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              Also, you could afford a house at this time with only one person working in the couple. The wife usually stayed at home until they progressively all went to work.

  • Jaytreeman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    One of the defining traits of the left is empathy.
    One of the defining traits of humanity is empathy.
    If you’re not left you’re less than. I said it. I stand by it.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Humans are really good at empathizing. But we are also really good at delineating between in and out groups. It was crucial to protect your tribe over every other human. We now have a massive problem of entire countries or even the world being the “in-group” since we have enough resources for everyone to survive.

      But those people wanting power are really good at exploiting that group mentality to cause groups to form in people’s minds. Then they use that delineation to withdrawn empathy from those new out groups. And when those delineations aren’t coherent among actual groups, it causes a lot of divisions that can be exploited.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    as somewhat of a ‘commie’ yea kinda, but again its crazy that someone who toils away at work for the better part of his life and earns a salary for his contribution to society will sometimes have to be hungry or homeless. on average you do all that and are at least always struggling for money come on.

    considering we have smartphones, rockets and AI, at this point im surprised some people are not considering alternatives.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pretty sure the general attitude toward .world is that the users tend to be liberals, especially those who came from Reddit during the API fiasco. Generally people who mean well but probably haven’t engaged with the Linux, FOSS, Privacy, Anarchist, Socialist, or Communist communities before coming to Lemmy.

      .ml itself is generally more leftist, a common misconception is that there are only Marxist-Leninists on .ml, when there are tons of Anarchists and Socialists as well, just much fewer liberals.

      Where Hexbear is a big-tent “dirt bag left” server, and lemmygrad is an explicitly Marxist-Leninist-Maoist server, .ml is actually just focused on FOSS and privacy, and as such tends to attract more leftists than .world.

      An example of the differences between .world and .ml I have noticed are on the recent death sentence for the KyoAni mass murderer posts. On the .world version, most seemed celebratory of the death sentence, while on .ml most were deeply saddened by the event but held the belief that the death penalty is wrong fundamentally, and that instead it should’ve been life in prison.

      Just my 2 cents as a .ml user.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you think the Means of Production should be owned collectively, or individually? Do you agree with horizontal power structures being dominant, or do you believe more in centralization?

      There’s a ton more to it, but those 2 questions pretty clearly give you a direction.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Collective ownership of the Means of Production is Socialism, generally. Communism is the specific Stateless, Classless, Moneyless society built on the foundations of Collective Ownership along Marxian analysis, but you can have Collective ownership in, say, Syndicalism, Anarchism, Market Socialism, Democratic Socialism, etc.

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    Tax should pay for healthcare of all citizens.

    Why am I paying tax if I still have to pay to see a doctor?

  • shiveyarbles@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yeah I think Republicans and centrist Democrats are involved in a massive gaslighting campaign against the American citizens. ie: the overton window, aka shifting what’s thought of as acceptable towards corporate donors requirements. Empathy is what makes us human.

  • RedditWanderer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    I really wouldn’t mind the whole rhetoric of pulling yourself by the bootstraps if it wasn’t rigged. The system is literally made to make ppl fail.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s also the fact that it originated as an expression meaning “doing something impossible” since pulling on your own bootstraps would PREVENT you from getting up.