• DreadPirateShawn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      No. The court is ordering the state to allow the necessary medical procedure, NOT mandating to the pregnant woman that she must have an abortion. You either need to read the article more closely, or stop changing the words into different meanings, whichever is relevant.

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        10 months ago

        They are clearly satirizing the arguments conservatives make about allowing abortions.

        • The Doctor@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          Unless the OC says anything, I’m not assuming there was any sarcasm. I knew too many people back home who honestly believed such things.

          • kandoh@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            10 months ago

            As long as the fetus is baptized so it’s soul may enter the Kingdom Of Heaven then mandatory abortions guarantee salvation inshallah 🙏

          • kandoh@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s all part of the demonrats plan to replace the white people with Muslims from Mexico

    • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      No no no this is just a cover to be used when the 5G vaccines activate and start causing mass preborn child deaths. These good god fearing women are part of the silent majority and would never actually want an abortion, this is the deep state’s doing!

      Oh and something something Jewish space lasers too

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    🤖 I’m a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

    Click here to see the summary

    The decision marks a significant development in the ongoing debate over the state’s medical exception to its controversial ban on abortions after six weeks – one of the strictest in the nation.

    Her lawsuit is believed to be one of the first attempts in the country by an individual seeking a court-ordered abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year, according to the New York Times.

    She has had two prior cesarean surgeries – C-sections – and, the suit said, “continuing the pregnancy puts her at high risk for severe complications threatening her life and future fertility, including uterine rupture and hysterectomy.”

    “The idea that Mrs. Cox wants desperately to be a parent, and this law might actually cause her to lose that ability is shocking and would be a genuine miscarriage of justice,” Judge Maya Guerra Gamble said.

    A lawyer representing Texas argued Thursday that Cox’s pregnancy symptoms did not meet the standard set out by the state for a medical emergency that would allow for an abortion.

    The argument over subjective versus objective medical reasons for an abortion is central to the ongoing debate and legal fights regarding the state’s exception rule.


    Saved 81% of original text.