Russian President Vladimir Putin is urging Russians to have more children. 
"Large families must become the norm," Putin said in a speech Tuesday. 
Russian birth rates are falling amid war in Ukraine and a deepening economic crisis. 

Russian President Vladimir Putin is urging women to have as many as eight children as the number of dead Russian soldiers continues to rise in his war with Ukraine, worsening the country’s population crisis.

Addressing the World Russian People’s Council in Moscow on Tuesday, Putin said the country must return to a time when large families were the norm.

“Many of our grandmothers and great-grandmothers, had seven, eight, or even more children,” Putin said.

  • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    250
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find it hard to imagine wanting to have kids just so your dictator has more meat to feed into his meat grinder. Perhaps the only good news is Putin hopefully doesn’t have 18 more years in him, so the kids won’t have to deal with him directly, but who knows who will sit in the throne next…

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      1 year ago

      I doesn’t work either. Appeals to nationalism, religion, and even straight up paying and providing luxury benefits to people, in order to have them start having more kids just did nothing in the long run. The world is different. Your children are more likely to become independent adults when you put your resources into a smaller number of children. The cost/benefits ratio of having large families to produce stability, and increase the chances at least one child will be successful, has completely reverse from 100+ years ago.

        • Gork@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          That might end up being the scary reality for the women and girls who have been abducted in Ukraine.

        • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The scale at which they would need to do this would make even forcing pregnancy and birth not really sustainable. Especially when the child are being birthed into the world where the economics are against large fertility rates.

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the irony is that you don’t even need to do something like that. Just open a bunch of “orphanages” that are all about hammering absolute loyalty to the dear leader, offer to pay money for any kids that are left there, reap the rewards in a couple of years. As a double whammy, parents are also free to continue fully dedicating to work.

          Libertarians would probably have the weirdest hate boner if that happened, selling kids (great!) to the govt (horrible!)

          • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Christ my mind went somewhere else. I thought you were gonna suggest that after they open the orphanages and they get populated they would offer the kids a bunch of benefits once they were of age to start breeding. I bet a significant portion of those kids would take it in a heart beat since the alternative is being kicked out at 18 without anywhere to go or money.

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              since the alternative is being kicked out at 18 without anywhere to go or money.

              Legaly, all orphans who don’t already own home, will get one from state. But governor wants 5th yacht too.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Putin will open rape/baby factories for female prisoners next. Just watch.

          If anything, they would outlaw contraception first, before going down that road that you’re describing, not that that road would be successful in either case.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know if or when they ended the Maternity Medal, Order of Maternal Glory, and Mother Heroine awards for having large families in Russia. I don’t know much about the programs, just what a friend who emigrated told me about them (and what wikipedia says)

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re already projecting compassion he doesn’t have by assuming he’d wait for them to turn 18. If he thought it would work, he’d march 5 year olds in bomb vests over the border then have Elon announce that Ukraine kills children.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I mean it’s unlikely Putin lives another 16 years, so even if they’re sending 15 year olds to the front this won’t help the war machine

        It’s more about long-term population loss. There’s a reason combined-arms forces are used and mass infantry assaults are not. Problem is, Russian military hardware sucks for a lot of different and systemic reasons so that option isn’t realistic over a large theater.

        Putin is straight up bleeding Russia out and it’s really sad that this many people are displaced and dying over one man’s ego and lust for his station.

    • rammer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The hate of men will pass and dictators die and the power they took from the people will return to the people. And so long as men die liberty will never perish.

      Source

    • Amanduh@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      What doesn’t make sense to me is that even if women start churning out babies putin will be dead by the time theyre at fighting age? Is he just trying to help the next war hungry dictator after him?

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s trying to repair the damage he’s done so that it doesn’t last a hundred years.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He’s trying to be the legend who remade the Russian Empire of the late 1800s. It doesn’t matter so much that he’s alive for the Great Payoff™ – he needs to be the biggest name in the history books for centuries to come.

        He knows he’s old and will die, and he knows he’s not going to achieve his big goals soon enough to directly benefit. So now he’s looking at his legacy.

        That’s the stage when dictators *and narcissists become truly dangerous, by the way, because knowing they won’t directly see the fruits of their labour, they have less to lose.

        e: added a word*

  • Stamau123@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder if women will start getting medals for babies, like soviet times? Another question, if these women are raising 8 kids, and all the men are dead in a sunflower field south of Avdivika, who the hell is supposed to be working in Russia for the next generation? Just banking on enslaving Ukraine to pay for the cost of enslaving Ukraine?

          • anlumo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think winning is not the goal of the Western military, the goal is to reduce the amount of military equipment in Russia to a historic low. This can’t be accomplished by winning quickly.

            • SkyeStarfall
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              People need to understand the west aren’t exactly acting in the name of moral good, but pragmatic egoism, instead. Just because helping Ukraine is good in this instance, doesn’t mean governments do it for the same reasons for why most people think they should get help.

              It’s realpolitik, and human lives don’t matter. As much as I despise that thought.

              The west may be better, but it’s still not good.

            • marcos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              Currently, just like at any other time since they attacked, it’s entirely up to Russia to decide how much equipment they will lose on the war. The speed of Ukraine defense won’t impact the result.

          • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            The ol’ Napoleon strategy.

            I’ll just invade the Cossacks, this should only take a few days

            …Oh Fuck…

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely, and they pretty much have to commit to that plan at this point.
        Before their losses started piling up the way they have been, I’d assumed his plan was to install a puppet government and “annex” useful provences into the Soviet Union Russian federation.
        But with the population losses that require women to become livestock for the sake of the country, he’s absolutely going to enslave able bodied workers in every region he’s able to hold onto.

    • DaDragon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      They actually introduced pretty much that exact thing back in 2008, the Order of Parental Glory. Have more children to fuel the machine, please

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Narayana Murthy: People should be working 70 hours/week.

      Vladimir Putin: Why so few?

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey Putine, let me help ……

    All you gotta do is excuse people from military service for being a parent. Pretty soon all military aged males will be parents and you’ll greatly reduce the number of deaths in Ukraine. Win-win

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s actually pretty brilliant. Although it would also grind new recruits to a halt. It’s almost like he should retreat and take the L and try rebuilding

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      All you gotta do is excuse people from military service for being a parent. Pretty soon all military aged males will be parents and you’ll greatly reduce the number of deaths in Ukraine. Win-win

      Sorta kinda exists, but you need at least 4 children below 18 years. But I don’t think this increases amount of military aged males or any doctors being parents.

          • Auzymundius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            He meant that you’d have to start fathering children at 14 so that you could have 4 of them under 18 by the time you turn 18, which would be the age for military service.

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Or you can start at 17, but you will need 4 of them. MIMO approach. Or MISO. Depends how you view it.

            • uis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah. I got it. So you won’t be conscripted after school. Well, there are other ways to delay it like leaving country or getting professional or higher education.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s one way to deal with an ageing population demographic.

    Another way is to perhaps not throw every able-bodied young man into a militaristic meat grinder because you still yearn for the Soviet Union days.

    • Mistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s probably yearning for the Russian Empire instead of Soviet Union.

      Russian governmental officials have some really outlandish views for an average Russian person.

      They’re very religious, believe in conspiracies, actively anti-lgbt, don’t support abortions, antisemitic to name a few. None of these qualities are present in the general masses. They are in their own informational bubble.

      As far as I understand it, he believes that the Russian Empire and collective Europe were always at each other’s throats, and that never changed for over 200 years. At the same time, Russia is a successor of the Russian Empire, and USSR is being omitted for some reason. That’s the simplistic explanation of it.

      For you to understand how crazy that is, Russians (in general) have little to no idea of how the Empire worked and what the views those people held. USSR essentially wiped out all of that culture.

  • n0m4n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where are these women going to find suitable partners to pick from? The smart ones left or will leave, the others will be growing sunflowers.

    • Shapillon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Javier Milei, Matteo Salvini, Boris Johnson, Geert Wilders, Jair Bolsonaro & a frightening whole lot of others have entered the chat.

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      They need the dogma of out breeding the competition so they can maintain a labor class without giving up any of the hoarded resources.

      No sane people want to breed in our current conditions anywhere, so gotta make them insane with promises of eternal hurrdurr if only you crank out babies for God.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re working on it. Alongside the abortion fight, there are also Republicans fighting no fault divorce and there are Republicans fighting minimum marriage age laws.

  • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this is true, this has to be the ultimate way of not really dealing with the population crisis upon us. Not saying any government is doing a great job here as they are all beating around the bush and not addressing root causes, but this one from Putin has to be the most delusional of them all.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no population crisis, unless you mean there are too many people. Most of the work we do is entirely unnecessary and only exists to help billionaires become trillionaires. At least that’s the case in countries that don’t need meat to throw in front of bullets.

      Necessary jobs are mostly farming, mining, manufacturing, and customer service. The first two have already been automated to need only a tiny percentage of the workforce they once require. Manufacturing is mostly there as well, and is getting closer all the time. Customer service still employs a lot of humans, but even those jobs are being replaced or augmented with physical or logical bots.

      • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        The crisis is that without enough babies, there will not be enough young people to support the older people. It is why places like Canada have such high immigration as it offsets the lack of births from Canadian citizens. Now, it is a crisis from a planet health perspective. No. It is the best thing that could happen right now as we really could use less people and their associated carbon emissions, but it will still impact the economy hard especially since it is becoming a steep birth rate decline in so many countries. Feels like a free fall right now and to address is going to take as much change as it will take to fix the climate emergency. Might even have some of the same solutions.

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I say this as someone who had lots of kids - you cannot build an economy on a continuous explosion of population. That is ridiculous. There are enough people - the population of the earth has more than doubled in my lifetime. I’d much rather work till I die, than tell someone else they must reproduce. Let people who want kids have them, let people who don’t want kids not have any, it’s working out and population growth has slowed and hopefully population will decrease. That’s fine, yes many of us will be old at once, that’s not the fault of the non-reproducing people. There wouldn’t be fewer old people even if everyone had kids, it has to happen before things settle back out.

          • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Very much agree. Besides, it is looking like we really are entering an era of significant human life extension if you believe all the longevity breakthroughs.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The crisis is that without enough babies, there will not be enough young people to support the older people.

          So you didn’t read a word I said beyond the first sentence. Got it.

          • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I do not understand your comment as my comment was building upon yours as you went down the billion support path and I just added the old age pension path.

          • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe. There is serious breakthroughs with longevity tech with aging and diseases perhaps being a thing of the past in the decades to come. Maybe.

      • Raxiel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Necessary jobs are mostly farming, mining, manufacturing, and customer service.

        And elder care, which is set to be a real growth industry

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s fair, but even in that there is a whole lot that automation can do to address the ratio of elderly to caregivers. Japan is ahead of the curve on population decline, and they are not exactly fond of immigrants. That has been a huge driver behind the development of technologies for elder care.

        • kofe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That and healthcare are counted as services iirc, which can contribute to some confusion when you look at 70% ish of the economy being made up of that. But most jobs being created now are like the top commenter said, minimum wage service jobs that don’t meet the needs of employees and aren’t great for customers, either