Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask but I couldn’t find the skull identifying community.

Found in Western US

  • Jerb322@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty hard to say without the outer part of the beak. Looks like a bird of prey of some kind. Most are protected, if not all, so be careful who you show it to…unless you’re a teacher, then you can say it’s for class.

    • CaptainBlagbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would they assume OP killed the bird, or is it illegal to pick up the skull? (Are the bones beneficial to other organisms?)

      • Jerb322@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What I understand of the law is, if you can’t hunt it, you can’t have any part of it. Unless you are planning on using it for educational purposes. Rodents will eat bones.

    • Catoblepas
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if OP is a teacher they probably need a state permit to possess bones from native birds.

      • Jerb322@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very possible. I just remember it saying “except for educational purposes” or something similar.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not an expert but I believe what looks like the eye socket at first glance is actually the nasal fenestra or whatever name the nose opening has. It’s a fragment without a beak or eye sockets.

    • Theroddd@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree, the “beak” would be oriented wrong if the opening is an eye socket. If the “beak” is vertical then the eye socket would be a vertical hole as well.