I just realised I hit upvote on just about every single post and most comments kind of instinctively, meanwhile think like 5 mins before downvoting.
What are your upvote habits??
If it helps contribute to the conversation in a meaningful way, I’ll vote it up. Even for things I disagree with. Disagreeing is for comments.
If it does not contribute in a meaningful way, I’ll vote it down. If they’re being nasty, spreading misinformation without 10s of research, or otherwise making the topic harder to communicate, down it goes.
If there isn’t an obvious reason why things should go up or down, I don’t vote. If the vote needs some explanation, I add a comment unless someone already said what I meant to say. Then I vote on that.
Up and down does not mean yes and no to questions. Up and down doesn’t mean agree or disagree on a subjective level. Otherwise, imagine what it would be like if you translated the context to real life. A bunch of drama queens not saying anything to each other.
Agree with everything, and I applied my own little rule too witch states that if I comment or reply to something, then I have to upvote whatever I’m replying to, no matter what I think of it.
“Cool!” -> upvote
“Twat.” -> downvote
“ehh” -> ignore
Removed by mod
That is bizzare behaviour, I havent blocked anyone on lemmy yet. I mean theres like 20 users in total. I see someome comment on a post of mine and think oh yeah i remember that username. Its a really small space.
I’ll glance at someone’s comment history before blocking them. If they were merely unusually angry (or maybe I just didn’t get their joke), whatever. It happens. If they’re an asshole on a regular basis, though, I don’t need to see their next tantrum. Time for a block.
I don’t block much, but I have seen a number of shameless ad accounts and a number of rabid fascist accounts, and life’s too short to listen to either of those.
Yeah ofc block those. I guess Im in saner subs
I almost never downvote, except if somebody is deliberate troll. I don’t downvote things I find negative, depressing or wrong.
I usually upvote posts/comments I comment on and I seldom comment just because somebody is wrong in the internez.
I upvote if somebody has already commented something I was about to comment.
I upvote posts I feel people should see, even if they are horrible or sad.
I upload things that I like. I never, ever downvote anything.
Personally, I kind of never intuitively thought up and down analogous to “good” or “bad”, rather I’ve always just thought of them as signal boosting and signal… uh, diminishing?
I.e I upvote stuff I think more people should see, and downvote things I think nobody should see. Neither of which directly correlate with good or bad or my level of agreement.
Came here to say this. Upvote something (usually posts - I don’t worry about comments) I think should be more visible to people, and only downvote if it’s something I feel shouldn’t get more oxygen.
We don’t have downvotes on my instance, and it’s an amazing difference. I recommend it!
I generally just upvote everything I like, no real thought process involved.
I love downvotes, it’s the one thing that makes lemmy/ reddit different from other social media and it generally moves the worst stuff out of sight.
The fediverse software I’m building weights the upvotes based on whether the instance has downvotes enabled or not. No downvotes = 0.5 weighting (admin configurable). My thinking is that when there are no downvotes, half of the signal is missing so upvotes from that instance are less useful.
I upvote everything I like. I only downvote if the person is being hateful or really unconstructive.
I sort by new and upvote content I think most people will like, and downvote low quality content.
If it’s replies to a post of mine I upvote virtually everything. If something is so incorrect is borderline misinformation or so off topic that there’s no connection to the thread, I downvote. If it’s really insightful that I think more people should read it, I upvote.
I’ll upvote any constructive interaction, but I think a big reason why aggregators got popular was the ability for a user manifest their general disagreement with something in a way that can impact the visibility of that info. So I don’t think the overall nature of upvotes/downvotes could manage to be substantially different to Reddit or any other aggregator. The user behaviour is ultimately determined by the availability of the function, rather than the nature of the community that uses the platform/function
Everyone who engages in a post I made gets an upvote.
Everyone who replies to a comment I made gets an upvote.
If a post is interesting enough to me to comment, it gets an upvote.
Automatically downvote everything related to Trump, Musk, Zuckerberg.
Upvote thinks I think more people should see.
I rarely vote anywhere. I think it’s a toxic habit for many platforms and it fucks with some peoples brain.
Example:
Voice your sincere opinion that you really like blueberry ice cream. Get downvoted because someone thinks raspberry is better but just gave a downvote and no reason. Spend the rest of the day wondering why.But what about upvoting so more people get to see the very important debate on blueberry vs raspberry ice-cream?
deleted by creator
