Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have
Internet full of people blatantly arguing in bad faith shocker.
Anyone who shops at zara is a moron.
What’s sad is I’m sure most of them are the kinds of idiots that think they “need” more money.
Generally: Good! Nuance: Some people are super thin by default and still healthy. However, that is not the standard and should not be pushed on anyone. Can we find a way to regulate health requirements for models? There’s so much technology we can use these days to see if someone is damaging their body by behaving a certain way, would mandatory screening for that not be the best way forward?
That’s not to say less/unhealthy people can’t be models or beautiful, but just to make sure nobody feels like they need to starve themself in any way.
Ooh do Dollskill next
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have
Why is the description a snippet of Rule 3?
That’s good news.
Can we also ban ads with obese people in them, too?
There are two ends to the unhealthy weight spectrum, so it’s not right that only one is being targeted.
Bad comparision since the obese look is not something that young people strife for when they see an ad showing an obese person.
Normalising obesity makes it seem like less of a problem. It should not be normal to be so unhealthy that one is obese, let alone nearly half the country.
But I know that absolutely nothing will be done to improve the quality of life for people by our current government, and quality of life is a big factor in obesity as food is an easy comfort. So even if obese people were no longer shown in adverts etc, it would only mean that obese models and actors would get fewer roles.
Do you have any examples of ads that you would be in favor of banning?
Honestly, no, because I block all ads… and have no reason to see fashion ads at all.
Buy if I recall correctly, there have been several beauty brands that have overweight models and then frame it as “perfect” or something like that.
Like like with malnurished models, promoting obesity as “perfect” is damaging to anyone influenced by the marketing, especially teens.
I get their inclusion and body positivity mission, but neither obesity or severe malnutrition should be promoted as anything but unhealthy.
Do you have any evidence that people are striving to be obese because of these adverts? I’d rather not have people call for laws based on vibes. Especially your shitty vibes.
Do you have any evidence that people are striving to be obese because of these adverts?
Yes, there is evidence. For example, this paper from 2015.
I wouldn’t say they are “striving” to be obese, but conceding to an unhealthy weight is objectively just as bad.
So no, then
No to “striving to be obese”, yes to “being ok with staying obese.”
Does that matter if the end result is people still being unhealthy because of the messaging in these ads?
Well the law in question here wasn’t made because ads were normalising being a skeleton. The law was made because people were starving themselves on purpose to become like that. The adverts set an unrealistic beauty standard and women were becoming malnourished trying to reach it. So yes it matters. It’s literally why the law was created years ago.
Making an argument about “normalising” unhealthiness is a whole other ball game.
While one might struggle to find evidence that people are striving to become obese due to these ads, I think, these ads normalize (or at least, try to normalize) obesity which might lead to obese people not wanting to seek help (medical or otherwise) or might even discourage obese people from trying a healthier lifestyle.
The reason we target advertisements in this way is because they’re saying “this is what you need to look like” which encourages young women to starve themselves as they strive to be size 4. This is a separate issue to merely “normalising” things. If you’re concerned with normalisation of obesity, why are you focusing on adverts and not, say, The Simpsons or Family Guy?
What’s with all the stupid comments here?
She is obviously unhealthily thin, and of course she is allowed to be thin.
What is not allowed, and shouldn’t be anywhere, is to idealize such extreme unhealthy standards in advertisements, and particularly not as a “fashion statement”.Edit PS:
The reason it is banned in some places, and should be banned, is that it sets an unhealthy standard, and causes eating disorders among especially teenager girls. It’s basically for the same reason that advertising tobacco is illegal in most places.So by that logic we should ban all ads featuring fat people too?
You have to compare this to being obese, not simply being fat, that girl is not simply slim, she is extremely thin bordering on anorexic.
So no, and the reason it is banned in some places and should be in all, is that it causes eating disorders especially among teenage girls that try to become unhealthily thin to live up to an impossible fashion ideal.
There is no similar fashion ideal for being obese. But if hypothetically there was, and it caused a similar effect, it should also hypothetically be illegal to use obese models.
I’m that thin too. Do you know how fucking tired I am of hearing about how I’m “bordering on anorexic”? Shut the fuck up, I probably eat more than you. You’re right, there are a lot of stupid comments in here, as you put it. But they all sound like you. Reread your comments with the new understanding that there are thin people reading them too.
This is just a bunch of fat people collectively saying ‘ew you should eat more’ and it’s gross.
Seriously. This was my take too. It’s gross that people are calling a thin person that they know nothing about “unhealthy”.
This assumption that young women are so silly and impressionable that they can’t be allowed to see thin women modelling clothes because they might be inspired to become dangerously underweight, is really starting to annoy me.
Yes having only very thin women modelling in adverts is bad, but this isn’t bad because ‘fashion obsessed girls are so dumb they’re gonna stop eating if they see this’, it’s bad because not all women are thin, and advertising only with the thinnest narrows the market you appeal to.
And if eating disorders in young women were really such a big worry for the government, surely they would instead fund nhs mental health services properly to make getting help for disordered eating and the issues which cause it (here’s a hint, it’s not fashion), much easier and safer to access?
But no, this is not what is being done, they’re banning adverts with thin models instead.
Starmer really doesn’t like women it seems. Too thin and you’re stupid and impressionable and promote mental illness by existing, too many children and you’re a scrounger who doesn’t deserve government support, lacking an extra X chromosome and you’re banned from public loos and refused healthcare.
Why do I have to compare this to being obese? What metric are you using that implies
(obese == skinny) > fat?Very obviously for similar extremism.
So its only extremist based? What about body building?
Whataboutism?
You could say what about lots of things, but what about arguing your case?
Body building is not at all within a similar category of fashion magazines setting an unhealthy standard as for being thin.Mention One high end fashion company that uses extreme body builders for their models.
Body building is a sport, being thin is not a sport.Although body building is also extreme, it is a different category and a different debate.
It’s not whataboutism - just trying to understand your point of view how skinny is worse than fat when objectively speaking they both carry similar health risk, I’d even argue that until you get old skinny is still healthier than fat. So clearly you’re not referring to the health metric - what is it then?
You just keep patching your thought process with goal post movement. First it’s health, then it’s extreme mindset, now it’s “sport” whatever that means?
Either way cleaely you haven’t formed a steong position here and as someone who’s been friends with many people who are naturally skinny and got bullied for it I’d say that you’re really missing something here.
Why do you say she’s obviously unhealthily thin? Per the article:
both models in question had medical certification proving they were in good health when the pictures were taken.
The only evidence the article gives to there unhealthiness is the protruding collarbone. As someone who is naturally very thin I can assure you that you can be healthy and have a protruding collarbone.
I understand ads are setting beauty standards that are unachievable for a lot of girls and women which causes a lot of problems, but I don’t think ths solution is to mark certain body shapes as unhealthy and ban them, there is no universal healthy body shape, what is healthy for some is unhealthy for others. This isn’t even getting into issues of race and other unchangeable attributes someone else might have and feel bad for not matching a standard. The solution is to ban fashion advertising in general, or at least to teenage girls, so you don’t have to deal with these issues.
Trump also has stellar health certificates despite being obese, when they are obviously false, why should I give a shit about a piece of paper where you can be paid to write anything?
I did not make my conclusion based on the wording in the article, but based on the pictures. And 2 things stood out to me, her sunken eyes, and her very thin legs.
Regarding the protruding collarbone, it’s not just protruding which I agree can be normal, but hers is extremely protruding.
She may be built that way maybe having some fat burning gene or something, but she is still extremely thin, and using that kind of models to depict what is fashionable, has been very well documented to be harmful to especially teenage girls and cause eating disorders.
Welcome to the internet. Lemmy is better than a lot of places but we’ve still got people who need to be deprogrammed and/or don’t understand nuance.
In this instance, there seem to be people that believe pushing an unrealistic beauty standard on young people is some monumental effort to curb obesity or that tackling that problem is promoting obesity.
And just bc I’m on the internet and it’s expected that I have no nuance, I’ll go ahead and guess it’s a bunch of dudes that think they know what’s best for women. Real, “I’m a feminist bc I protect them” types.
UK try to go a day without banning something challenge: impossible
Got a liocense for that physique
America just deports you to el Salvador without due process instead.
In America you have the license but the officer can’t read so you’re under arrest (shot in self defense) anyway
They look anorexic. I don’t know why so many people are into that skeletal look.
They absolutely do not look anorexic - are we looking at the same pictures?
This seems like just a different flavor of bullying just now skinny people instead of fat. Some people are naturally frail and shouldn’t be outcast from society for something they cant control (unlike most fat people).
Anorexia is much more dangerous than obesity. Holding up the anorexic body type as a model of beauty has killed many young girls.
Is it? According to whom? Are you comparing an extreme anorexic to an extreme 400kg obese person? Is the line really that clear for you here?
Idk, I thought they looked good. I wouldn’t describe that as skeletal
‘protruding collarbones’
Isn’t that normal in a healthy person?
Yes but she didn’t have a license for protruding collarbones
Arrest her ass and send her to el Salvador. This is a traitorous crime. Over half of patriotic Americans work tirelessly to ensure their collarbones are buried deep.
It should protude if you do the
Dude looks like Ruby Weapon
The what, mind flayer?
As someone with their six pack stored in the cooler, even I have protruding collar bones
There’s a difference between seeing someone’s collar bone and accidentally slicing your hand on it.
Zara ran ads in Britain mocking the Palestinian Civilians being slaughtered by Israel.
It is clear that they have no respect for any human life.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2023/12/12/zara-ad-campaign-body-bag-images-gaza-conflict/
How can you look at this and think it has anything to do with Gaza? It’s just completely unrelated art, wtf is wrong with people? And they got Zara to remove the images too lol…
"Zara said the campaign had been conceived in July and photographed in September, before the conflict erupted in October. The company said the campaign presented “a series of images of unfinished sculptures in a sculptor’s studio and was created with the sole purpose of showcasing craft-made garments in an artistic context”.
Zara opened its new and largest “flagship store” in February in Israel. The company ia deeply in bed with Israel and the claims to their defense are insincere. The timing of that campaign was obvious.
Lmao what an idiotic stretch. Here’s an archive if someone else wants to have a laugh: https://archive.is/J6s6J
Clearly they were upset they couldn’t get their models to look as skinny as the starving malnourished children
Great news!
Have you looked at the pictures? It’s a normal looking woman.
Can’t have the poms feeling bad about their bodies, can we now?
