• jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      5 days ago

      It cracks me up that compound interest gets raised every time someone makes an argument about just how much money billionaires have. As if the only reason we’re not billionaires is because we were too dumb to invest the $5,000 we’ve been making every day since Columbus sailed the ocean blue.

        • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Compound interest when charged by lenders

          Today “compound interest” usually relates to reinvested dividends and amortized growth/appreciation of investments (e.g., stocks, bonds) simply because non-predatory loans are designed for payoff within some fixed term. So if the term “compound interest” applies, something unexpected is happening (e.g., default) and the loan will be bundled and sold at a discount to collections.

          Not far enough back to make a difference I’d wager

          I’ll take that wager! 5k daily, ignoring inflation and leap-years, compounding annually (not quarterly) at 10% annualized ROI, gives us the standard annuity formula

          1.1 * 5000 * 365 (1.1n-1) / 0.1

          where n is the number of years, which

          … in 100 years becomes ~278 billion (e11)

          … in 200 years becomes ~3.8 million billion (e15)

          … in 300 years becomes ~53 billion billion (e19)

          … in 400 years becomes ~721 thousand billion billion (e23)

          … in 533 years becomes ~231 billion billion billion (e29)

          If that sounds incredible to you, you’re not alone. It’s the result of a hyperbolic growth curve that starts slow but keeps accelerating indefinitely, and 533 years is a very long time in market terms, so you easily reach the silly-numbers range.

          Edit: the numbers before were napkin computation. I edited this to use the standard annuity formula which should be more accurate. Point should be the same though. Exponential growth is crazy.

            • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Lol you’re right! It looks like the final number I gave was only for 400 years. I didn’t actually reach 533.

              Also I was rounding numbers midway through like a pen and paper physics computation. Since that error scales exponentially, even if I had gotten to 533 the final number was guaranteed to be off.

              Update: fixed it

          • desktop_user
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            even $1 at 1% compound interest gets ridiculous after a hundred years

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      No it isn’t because it’s an imagery used to show how absurd that amount of money is. 5000 a day is easy to grasp and a few hundred years is easy to grasp.