• JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Isn’t spirulina more effective for capturing carbon than trees? And also you can eat it in the way you don’t normally eat trees? Trees are great and all but why do you want me to be angry about algae?

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think it’s probably cheaper in the long run to self host a tree instead, unless you live in an apartment with absolutely no green space. But I’d rather get a VPF and host a tree there if I had too

    • hazel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      52 minutes ago

      Problem with VPFs is irrigation throttling, or lack thereof. Most people are cool, but I’ve heard of people hosting exotics which just max out downstream 24/7. Plus everyone has root access which gets abused frequently.

  • Günther Unlustig 🍄@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Does this count too?

    I already posted this on !balconygardening@slrpnk.net. .

    I’m purposefully growing duckweed on my balcony.
    I’m doing !hydroponics@slrpnk.net, and by doing that, I have lots of waste water with still good fertilizer in it.

    Duckweed is one of the fastest growing, nutrient densest and least demanding plant out there, and you can just scoop it out with a strainer.

    It’s exponentially growing and if you don’t wanna eat it, it makes great organic fertiliser or animal feed with lots of protein and micronutients!

  • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I had the same reaction until I read this.

    TL;DR: it’s 10-50x more efficient at cleaning the air and actually generates both electricity and fertiliser.

    Yes, it would be better to just get rid of all the cars generating the pollution in the first place and putting in some more trees, but there are clear advantages to this.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How long does it take to break even from the pollution and electricity spent to make and install these?

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I appreciate Rebecca Watson’s opinion. Watched the 6min video, now convinced 👍

      Also learned a new term: kneejerk cynicism

    • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      It provides fertilizer but needs “some food”.

      How much food and what is it?

      Typically for aquariums you have to feed these things fertilizer so it seems odd

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s just some circle of life stuff, fertilizer, carbon dioxide, light in, The algae produces more algae. It loads up on a bunch of carbon, some of the bloom dies off, by removing it, you take the carbon with it along with some of the fertilizer components. You add a little more fertilizer in and the algae blooms more and sucks up more carbon dioxide.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Just give me a 4U tank somewhere where someone else can deal with harvesting the algae and a webcam aimed at it and I can enjoy it just fine from here. For me, selfhosting is mostly about the privacy, not principally about needing to be resistant to loss of Internet connectivity or the like.

  • Capricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Short answer: the bank won’t give your shiny new tree-planting business a loan as easily as it will to a “liquid tank tree replacement” one.

    Long answer:

    • Trees take time to grow
    • Trees need to be planted
    • Trees make shade
    • Animals like birds and insects like bees and mosquitos like to live next to them
    • Trees don’t need electricity
    • Trees take in heat radiated from the pavement
    • Trees don’t look cool

    While algae are more efficient at turning CO2 into oxygen in theory, in practice algae don’t have a good climate in such a tank (no oxygen without ventilation, i.e. constant electricity and they get cooked through the glass).

    All in all, more of a gimmick than anything.

      • eskimofry@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        was about to furiously reply with the same retort… but yeah. I LOVE green spaces

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Aren’t like half of those bullet points positives? Also in addition to what you said once you got a tree you got a tree, those tanks need constant maintenence and cycling which I doubt anyone is going to bother with for more than a year after installing them.

      • Rakonat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The comment you replying to was trying to not so subtly point out this is a business plot and little else. Nobody is going to pay a subscription fee to have a tree in front of their business, but they might cough up money for a third party to maintain a tank of algae out front if it was sold right

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    17 hours ago
    1. Wrong community, maybe? Lol

    2. iirc, algae are better oxygen producers per units of mass and volume, so a tank full of algae might actually be better than a tree. One issue though is that trees can grow on open ground, while algae require a tank to be built, most likely negating the economic benefits. Also, trees are more aesthetically pleasing.

  • 0ops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s not an either/or thing, the tank in the picture is literally sitting under a tree

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I love this about lemmy.
      Like someone stumbling into the wrong house and still being welcomed.
      It’s a lot more informal and relaxed than on the piss page of the Internet.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        This technique is controversial because there is limited understanding of its complete effects on the marine ecosystem,[5] including side effects and possibly large deviations from expected behavior. Such effects potentially include release of nitrogen oxides,[6] and disruption of the ocean’s nutrient balance.[1] Controversy remains over the effectiveness of atmospheric CO2 sequestration and ecological effects.

        Geoengineering is bullshit proposed by funding from fossil fuel companies so they can continue to pollute.

        The solution is simple: make it illegal to pollute. Fine the companies responsible for their past contributions to the climate catastrophe out of existence.