• BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    Lightning is one of those things that makes it easy to see why people invented Gods to explain the phenomena.

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    had this happened 2000 years ago a local village would be absolutely losing their SHIT.

    1. look at all that fucking MEAT
    2. god has blessed us with a bountiful harvest
    3. did you see all that fucking MEAT?!
      • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hard to know.

        Could go either way.

        I can certainly imagine people avoiding it because of implied danger.

        … but I can also imagine people evaluating it and concluding that “they don’t look sick, and they taste fine”.

        I guess the decision depends on how hungry you are.

        I think it’s important to point out that anyone making this decision was probably using the herd as a primary source of food…it’s pretty clearly a sign that you should hit the road.

    • Smee@poeng.link
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      Way back there weren’t any settlements, only nomadic tribes. They’d loose their shit alright. “Oh no, our transport and future food resources!”

  • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    how does lightning work? I’ve seen videos of people being struck like 5 times and they are fine with some scars and minor nerve trauma. What causes that person to be ok, but 300 reindeer just die?

    • AlsaValderaan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      3 days ago

      You get a circular voltage gradient away from the strike spot. A human with their two legs doesn’t spread along that as far as a deer’s four legs do, so they catch more voltage drop across that, which also runs through their body (along their heart etc). It just depends a lot on how and where a body is affected by electricity.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    4 days ago

    Electrocuted, basically:

    “Lightning does not strike a point, it strikes an area,” said John Jensenius, a lightning safety specialist with the National Weather Service. “The physical flash you see strikes a point, but that lightning is radiating out as ground current and it’s very deadly.”

    • AugustWest@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That’s interesting. I have seen lightning split a tree and then follow wires into a house blowing out the wall all long the path of the wires. I have also seen it lift up decking when following underground wires.

      But if lightning hits with no lightning rod and ground is equally everywhere I guess I could imagine this result.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        I read somewhere that the induced electical field shift near a lightning strike is - while orders of magnitude calmer than the strike itself - still powerful enough to burn, maim and kill.

        I think it’s what Wikipedia calls “side splash” in the article on lightning injury?

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        and ground is equally everywhere

        You make an interesting point; Lapland is known for being relatively flat, often stony and pretty much treeless. I’m sure that contributed to an increased radius.

      • dickalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Here’s a question with a non-intuitive answer, do you think lightning rods attract lightning or ….

      • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        Part of the problem is that we have two feet. When lightning strikes the ground nearby, it creates a difference in electric potential between the foot that’s closest to the impact point and the more distant one. If that potential is great enough, then an electric currect can jump through one’s shoe, go up into the body then down the other leg and back to ground.

        Laying down only increases the surface area in contact with the ground, so the best thing to do is get inside.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 days ago

            Feet have non-zero surface area so there’s still room for an electric potential between the near and far side of the foot. It’d be smaller so that isn’t an entirely terrible idea, but it is by no means foolproof.

              • Soggy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                “Fine”. Burns are very serious injuries prone to infection. Internal injuries are way harder to diagnose and treat. That’s a rough combination.

  • Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    4 days ago

    Imagine in prehistoric times you and your posse are stalking a herd of those when all of a sudden ZAP and they just lie there medium rare

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    This Practical Engineering video explains the concepts behind how this happened

    TLDR: The electricity is trying to flow through the Earth, but a reindeer is a better conductor, so it flows up into the nearest leg and down out the furthest leg. If they were standing on one foot they might’ve been ok