• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Dude does not understand how german elections work lmao. Nobody won that election, the conservatives got 28% of the vote. There will be at least a 3 party coalition and things could become pretty complicated.

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 minutes ago

      Since FDP and BSW didnt make it into the parliament SPD, CDU should be able to form a coalition. Only Problem, the SPD Chancellor candidate announced they dont want to coalate with the CDU. We may see the same Situation as in Austria.

      • fantasty@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        The (almost extremist) “conservatives” gained like 3 percent points or something since the last election. Plus, they have been in the government for like 80% of the time since WW2. Trump is soooo anti establishment but these guys ARE the most establishment anyone in Germany could be. They are not the solution to people’s problems, they are the ones who caused many of the problems in Germany.

      • Goldholz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        They didnt double. Olaf Scholz wasnt elected because he was liked. He and SPD last time got the most votes because media slammed against greens, and the CDU/CSU lies and corruption was layed open. Now people forgot who governed the most time and voted union again

      • cron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The “conservative party” is the CDU/CSU, and even though they won, they just had their second worst result since the 1950s.

          • Skydancer@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It shouldn’t. They did so poorly because 10% of the German electorate shifted even farther to the far right AfD, and another 10% had already done so in previous elections.

        • federal reverse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          While in this case, Trump clearly speaks about the party with the largest share, i.e. CxU — it would too make sense for Trump to call Afd “conservatives.” Because that’s the fun equivalence US Republicans use, as even they don’t seem to want to identify as “regressives”.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        It’s a win for the party, but a win for the party is different from winning the election.

        In the last Australian federal election, the Greens quadrupled their number of seats. It was absolutely a huge win for the Greens. But going from 0.7% of seats to 2.6% cannot mean you “won” the election. (Also…wow…that shows just how gross single winner elections are. Even with preferential voting. When a party that consistently gets over 10% of the votes is able to win less than 3% of seats and call that a huge win. Proportional systems like Germany’s MMP are amazing!)

        Whether you want to say the CDU/CSU “won” the German election, IMO, depends less on how their vote changed relative to the last election, and more on whether you want to say the party that ends up selecting the Chancellor “won” an election, even if they need to go into a three party coalition. My personal take is that yes, it’s not unreasonable to say they won.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        AfD (Conservatives Trump was looking for) doubled their vote, but won’t be part of government. Party with the most votes went from 23% to 28%.

          • belastend@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Because the actual party with the most votes categorically refused to work with them. Going inti a coalitiin with the 3rd placed SPD will still guarantee the CDU a majority in the Bundestag.

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            In parliamentary democracies, the “government” is the term used for the ruling party or coalition. Even more specifically, it’s used for the Ministers. It’s a more specific term than just referring to all elected representatives sitting in the parliament (the Bundestag, in the case of Germany, or maybe the Bundestag & Bundesrat). Comparing it to the American system, “government” is somewhat analogous to the “executive”—the President and Cabinet Secretaries—except that it’s a fuzzy term and can also mean the non-ministerial members of parliament who are allied with the ministers.

            So the AfD will not be a part of the Government because both the CDU/CSU and SPD have placed a cordon sanitaire around the AfD. They refuse to work with them because they view them as dangerous extremists. It would be theoretically possible for the CDU/CSU to break that cordon and form a government between just their party and the AfD, or they can form a traffic light coalition with the SPD and Green party. The latter seems more likely, given recent German political history.

          • boreengreen@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Cause they can’t find common ground and form alliances with other parties, to form a majority.

            At least that is how I understood it.

      • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 hours ago

        can you explain your reasoning here?

        The context comment makes much more sense, that this is not a conservative win, and Trump is too dumb to realize that that.

        • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Imagine that your place of work, a sizable but far from monopolistic company, suddenly finds itself with twice the clientele. You now service 20% of the market where before you serviced only 10. How might your boss describe that situation? Because mine would call it a win, with very little coaxing.

      • analoghobbyist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I’ve also read that the other parties have stated that they will not form a coalition with th AfD, so Trump’s friends will not have a seat at the table.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Merz already tried to form a majority for a vote in the parliament with the AfD, just a few weeks ago. There might not be a coalition, but I expect them working together.

        • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yeah, well Merz is a special kind of person so I wouldn’t hold my breath for that promise “not to form a coalition” with the AfD. Let’s see what the next weeks bring.