• MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      There’s a study that says the effects of an impact landing in water won’t be as bad as thought.

      Also there is a way of using nukes to detonate adjacent to an asteroid or comet that slows it down without a risk of fracturing it. The heat turns the surface red hot and makes it shoot out mass and slows it down more. So we can stop basically any asteroid as long as we see it.

    • prof_wafflez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      The difference from the movie is that we should just end it already and force the asteroid to collide specifically to destroy us.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Things have been so wacky I think we need bingo cards for global events. We could charge for them and give bingo winners some of the proceeds.

  • samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Xcom programmers say the asteroid has a roughly 2.3% chance of impacting Earth in 2032.

    So it’s a sure thing!

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’d be interested to see if they can capture it, rather than deflect the asteroid. We need to work on space-based manufacturing anyway, and it’d be convenient if we could get this thing parked at a Lagrange point for research and practice.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I don’t believe it is a possible target given how the orbital disk of the asteroid intersects with the surface of the earth. That’s of we don’t change the orbit, if we decide that is necessary, we’ll probably try to get a complete miss instead of just changing the impact site.

      DON’T LOOK UP

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        Well, this administration has been forcing politics into NASA by cutting funding and making all female/POC/LGBT employees unsafe/invisible. It’d be lovely if NASA was free from politics, but as we saw from Trumps last appointment of the totally unqualified Bridenstone, politics is shoving its ugly dick into science.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Unfortunately in a worst case scenario this gets very political, if we do something about it in advance an impactor probe should do the job, if we decide to play the 1/50 odds and lose then the most effective short notice method is a nuke. Not a direct strike but a near detonation which vaporizes a section of the surface of the object with the outgoing plasma effectively functioning as a massive thruster. Actually doing this is not trivial but not hard either (from an engineering standpoint), the tricky part would be actually managing to launch it without every nation on earth that happens to have a beligerant leader saber rattling and stone walling the prospect of a launch until its too late even for a nuke to do any good.

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I hope we didnt cut all of NASAs funding yet. I’d hate to leave that worst case scenario to Musk or Boeing to handle.

      • Owljfien@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Ikr, I have a bunch of terms on my filter list but then its in the comments anyway

        • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I have separate filter lists for both, posts and comments but I need to keep adding new ones every day. I guess “Mar a lago” is the one I’m adding today.

          • db2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I’m talking about it right now in this reply but not giving you any keywords. Muhaha.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      DC, please. Move all the good museums and historical stuff first, but don’t tell the administration.

    • Singletona082@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Eh calculated impact path ranges from south america through africa and india. None of these are where i want it to land.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Same here but I figure the rates are going to be really cheap so I can just use up my vacation days and travel to wherever it hits.

    • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Even if it’s at the top end of the predicted range, an impact would be ~40MT equivalent. Enough to level a city, but not an extinction event by any means; plus the likely impact path is across central America, the Atlantic, central Africa and north India - not really regions that have the resources to respond to a threat like this. Personally I’m hoping it misses, because I don’t see the counties that could do something about it stepping up right now, so you’d be looking at maybe 100 million people displaced from their homes and an insurmountable humanitarian crisis

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It goes without saying that this is all because of <enter your deity name here> disapproval of <enter your hated group here>.

        And the flyby is a test of ‘deity’s’ approval of our next actions. Either way we should immediately lower taxes on the rich.

        /s

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Most countries on Earth would treat this as a global catastrophe and put up funds regardless of where it’s projected to impact.

        Maybe not the current US, though.

        • bss03@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Probably not every 4 years. After 2032, Earth will not be near the intersection point of the two orbits for a while. It might be decades before it’s even close.

      • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I like how he brought up the fact that if we try and fail, then what? What happens if NASA bumps it just enough to push it from Africa to India?

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    An impact from such a rock wouldn’t trigger a mass extinction like the much larger, dino-snuffing Chicxulub impactor did 66 million years ago. But an asteroid that size could wreak regional havoc similar to the Tunguska impactor that flattened some 80 million trees in the Siberian wilderness in 1908