Roan spoke out against unfair labor practices within the music industry during her acceptance speech, saying:
“I told myself that if I ever won a Grammy and got to stand up here before the most powerful people in music, I would demand that labels in the industry profiting millions of dollars off of artists would offer a livable wage and health care, especially to developing artists. I got signed so young—I got signed as a minor. When I got dropped, I had zero job experience under my belt, and like most people, I had… quite a difficult time finding a job in the pandemic and [could not] afford insurance. It was devastating to feel so committed to my art and feel so betrayed by the system and dehumanized. If my label had prioritized it, I could have been provided care for a company I was giving everything to. Record labels need to treat their artists as valuable employees with a livable wage and health insurance and protection.”
Thanks for the description. I don’t follow award ceremonies so just going by the title it is really unclear why is this supposed to be uplifting, and comes off as just typical celebrity news. The description tells me neatly, and lets me click on the article if I want further elaboration.
Fuck majors, fuck every artist signed under them and fuck you for upvoting this
She better be ready for a fight because the music industry execs are salivating at the potential for firing all their artists and replacing them with AI
Nevermind that as an openly queer person, she’s probably on some ICE list already.
Sending her back to the Ozarks, while cruel, is not a deportation action.
You’re assuming they’re not deporting the queer people soon. Guantanamo isn’t in US soil so it might count, right?
Two speeches of the night because earlier she also stood up for trans women too 💖
https://bsky.app/profile/readandmake0ut.swifties.social/post/3lha6oq35jc2j
I honestly haven’t even listened to any of her music (and maybe I should give it a try at least) but so far I’ve liked almost everything I’ve seen and heard about her online. The mainstream music industry needs more punks and rebels to speak out and cause a ruckus. If anything, just to kill the manufactured, conformist slop it’s all become.
(and maybe I should give it a try at least)
It’s often pretty explicit, but legitimately quite good. It’s got an old school vibe with a modern bent.
Just listened to “Good Luck, Babe!” and “Hot to Go!”. Definitely poppier than my usual tastes, which I was expecting. But old school, as you say, and it gives me feelings of nostalgia. Her voice is awesome too.
I’m definitely sometimes in the mood for this kind of jam, so this might actually become a little guilty pleasure of mine. I think it would fit well with all the '90s (and some '80s) shit on my playlist anyway.
“Definitely poppier than my usual tastes, which I was expecting”
This is also my experience. I can also see myself occasionally feeling like this style of music though. Not listening to pop can sometimes cause people like me to be assholes and look down on pop music and anyone who enjoys it. My respect for Chapell Roan’s persona/politics and her showmanship caused me to listen to her stuff less judgmentally, allowing me to experience “pop music done well”
Stuff like this is why I don’t really watch rewards shows anymore. She’s not wrong, but I hate being preached at by people who are obscenely rich, just on general principle. The last person I’d listen to preach to me is someone who is famous, obscenely rich, and whining about it every time she opens her Instagram.
Thankfully the performances I want to see are on YT, so I don’t have to.
She promised to do this when she was unemployed with no career prospects during the pandemic. These are the issues and sentiments of a poor person, they may be spoken through her now very successful mouth, but the meaning is still rooted in that economic anxiety.
She wasn’t preaching at you, unless you’re a music executive
How dare she address the audience in front of her when she should have been thinking about you, who wasn’t in the audience, and in fact not even watching.
You are very special. This industry awards show and its members should have really considered your feelings.
Ok, snark off. Don’t watch awards shows. They’re not about you, or for you. They’re for industry circle jerking.
There’s a serious issue in FULLY equating wealth with being evil.
Plenty of reasons to hate this fact, but: In our current society, wealth is power. If you demonize anyone with even slightly above average wealth, you are starving your causes of ANY possible power.
I still recognize there is a correlation. Evil, greedy people seek more wealth. But never point to the wealth itself as the evil. Drive the reason, the reprehensible acts and the lack of taxes paid, themselves. Some wealthy people even agree they should pay more taxes.
Eh. There’s a difference between those that became rich exploiting other people’s labor (see: most of the owning class), and those that used their own labor (see: prolific artists and performers). On occasion, rich people are just normal, good people that came into money. Chappell Roan is one such occasion.
If after earning millions you are still part of the industry you are scum in for profit simple as that.
I wouldnt even be so sure that she is insanely rich. Literally had one very successful album so far, and we dont know the contracts for that, i.e. how nuch she actually got from the money it made.
She’s said to be “worth” ~6 mil. So we can estimate that at best she has <1 mil she owns in assets + liquid cash, so on a liquid cash level probably just well-earning, not rich?
I mean that’s still al ot of money, but considering how this “worth” is probably based on how much she is worth to a label, I doubt she herself owns that much.
True. Artists are exploited for their labor as well.
I 99% believe in “there is no such thing as an ethical billionaire” with the tiiiiiny asterisk for those who literally create such a cultural artistic phenomenon that they sell through to billionaire status on it alone. Unfortunately, two of the most prominent examples, Notch (Minecraft) and JK Rowling (Harry Potter, obvs) turned out to be total pieces of shit anyway.
Oh well.
Neither Notch nor Joan Roling (I am aware this is not her name, but if she decides others names for them I can decide hers for her) did it on their own. It is literally impossible to do so. Both of them 1) got insanely lucky, 2) got major investment behind them.
That major investment is were the billions actually came from. Its important to recognize “i recieved billions of dollars from shit fucks who got their billions the old fashions way, murder and exploitation, in order to promote my creation and make those billionaires even more wealth” is not the same as “the singular work of art that I produced generated a billion dollars of value for me without accepting tremendous amounts of blood money from the ruling class.”
It is not possible to become a billionaire without being guilty by association. You MUST participate in oppression because of the nature of capital.
I think this touches on the concept of labor aristocracy pretty well. But at the point where you’re a billionaire, even labor aristocrats would have needed to do some level of exploitation. At which point, they’re just doing the same thing the owning class does.
For instance, once you start doing shit like licensing IP (private property is theft; including “intellectual property”), creating fashion brands, perfume, and other forms of “passive income” (A.K.A. stealing from someone else) like that, you’re not really profiting off of your own labor anymore. You’re exploiting others.
I don’t think anyone from labor aristocracy can ever get to the point that they’re approaching billionaire status with clean hands (relative to how “clean” one can be under capitalism). But artists like Chappell Roan aren’t anywhere close to that, as someone else pointed out.
I mean in that case Roan is 99.94% fine, right?
