• cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      10 days ago

      I can side with the vegans that the meat industry needs to be clamped down on hard

      But eating meat in of itself is not wrong, that is what is natural

      • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        84
        ·
        10 days ago

        There are plenty of things that are ‘natural’ that are wrong to do, why is eating meat any different?

          • Carnelian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            48
            ·
            10 days ago

            That misses the question a bit, no? Everything that is wrong to do is a personal choice. It’s not relevant to whether or not it should be done

            • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Not really, some things are objectively bad and wrong and other things are merely subjective.

              The problem we’re having here are people who hold their subjective beliefs very strongly are then adamant that it makes said beliefs objective, just because they believe them.

              • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 days ago

                even things like killing being bad is not objective in my opinion, it just simply stems from our minds and societies’ process of growth through natural selection.

                We believe that killing is bad only because we share the majority of their DNA and we are close genetically to what we’re killing. It was evolutionarily incentivised to not kill those that are genetically close, as they and we share common ancestors from which such thoughts evolved.

                this is imo why we value humans more than other animals, animals more than vegetables and relatives over strangers. Friends being valued more than strangers make sense as well, as they share ideas in the place of the shared genome.

                in a wider scope none of this matters anyway, our lives and deaths are irrelevant to the universe and our lives don’t actually matter outside what our minds tell us.

                • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Just to clarify I’m not saying that we should go around killing people, just that objectivity isn’t real in morality

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            See this is what I told people when they found out I had sex with my dog, and they said I was crazy and abusive! Like, it’s my own choice!

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 days ago

              >inb4 some child left behind replies with “are you equating eating meat for sustenance with rape?”

              Yes. You could eat something else for sustenance. The reason you choose meat is because it’s a more enjoyable experience for you, despite the inherent harm. That sounds similar to another topic I mentioned in this comment

      • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Yes, but most people in the west don’t have the option to eat meat that are not from the meat industry.

        That is exactly why veganism is attractive in the west.

      • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 days ago

        Yo this seems to be a bad take

        I think something that defines humanity is that we really try not to follow the “rules of nature”, ie. the rule of the stronger over the weaker

      • adr1an@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        If you prefer to live a natural life, be my guest. Go ahead, live by your logic as you expect from others. Hunt, kill, and process your own food ;)

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      What ever horror humanity has done, we are still holding the beer of invertebrates.

      And yet nature’s is is not a justification for aught. The fruit of the tree of wisdom (mythically) gave us empathy that we may live in harmony with neighbors, and in the late game, we have learned the imperative to see value in the fallow wilds.

      A century ago, a vegan diet for humans as extremely difficult, possibly impossible. And to quote Saruman the forests will burn in the fires of industry! And they have.

      We are not a vegan culture today because the food industry focuses on sales and profits, not on nutrition and health.

      Though to be fair our massive land-hungry industrial farms will affect the biomes around them regardless of whether we grow plants or ranch livestock. Veganism is part of a solution towards a more harmonious civilization, but misses several pieces.