• Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    7 days ago

    Our species were shaped as omnivores, meaning we have a choice of what we want to eat. Don’t forget where we don’t live anymore: the jungle. Just because we used to live in caves doesn’t mean we should live in caves now. Also, they didn’t have McDonald’s in the jungle.

    • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      First and foremost: You are correct.

      Now allow me to try to be funny: Well… Apartments are just pretty square-ish caves.

      (Note that I said “try to be funny”)

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        After the second world war we also said “never again” but apparently some people missed that memo too.

        My man cave is so much more sophisticated than caves from the stone age. I have cats, instead of mountain lions. I have some paintings on the wall… Oh wait, no, that’s not much different. I have central heating instead of a camp fire. And I have to pay a ludicrous amount of rent. So yeah, my cave is much better than ancient caves. I guess…

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Vegans: exist

    People like OP: how dare you make your own choices about your own life that don’t hurt anyone in any way whatsoever

  • Moth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Tfw keeping animals in cages and slaughtering them after 6 months of misery from the comfort of your 21st century life is different from being a feral animal living in the wilderness

  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ah yes, the anti-vegan. Nearly as annoying as the vegan.

    I have the same advice for you as I have for vegans: let people eat what they want to eat, mind your business, and keep your preferences to yourself unless you’re asked.

    That said there is some irony here because you’re framing this as unreasonable, but we do this all the time with other humans. As an outsider you should treat members of a group differently than they treat each other - unless you’re saying white people should be allowed to drop N bombs lol

    • Strawberry
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I have the same advice for you as I have for vegans: let people eat what they want to eat, mind your business, and keep your preferences to yourself unless you’re asked.

      It seems you fundamentally misunderstand what veganism is

      • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I can’t tell if this is tongue in cheek or not.

        In case not, you can be secretly vegan, you don’t have to get up in people’s business about it. You can just privately adjust your own diet

        • Strawberry
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s not tongue in cheek. You described veganism as a dietary preference, but it is an ethical belief and practice. Keeping silent in the face of unethical behavior is normally seen as cowardly or, at the least, not a general positive. If you came upon a person kicking a child, you would likely want to intervene, not merely think to yourself that you wouldn’t do the same.

          Here’s a short medium post that sums it up decently, quoted for your convenience:

          Look through the comments of the latest Facebook post that has aroused the ire of non-vegans and you’re bound to see the following:

          ‘I don’t care if you’re vegan, just respect my choice not to be vegan.’

          ‘How come a vegan gets mad if you serve them meat but won’t serve you meat.’

          Stop telling other people how to eat!

          These reactions to the promotion of veganism and vegan food products would make complete sense if veganism were a dietary preference, akin to trying not to consume sugar or not liking pickles. But veganism is an ethical stance against the commodity status of animals. Following a vegan diet results when you follow this philosophy.

          When you understand the vegan philosophy, the idea of respecting someone’s choice to needlessly consume animal products no longer makes sense. Advocating that people stop using animals to the greatest extent possible is the ethical thing to do, and condoning animal use immoral. Serving non-vegan food to a vegan is rude but serving vegan food to a non-vegan is acceptable because, while a vegan has a moral conviction against eating animals, a non-vegan doesn’t believe that eating a meal without animal products is unethical. They’ve likely eaten Oreos or peanut butter on toast many times.

          https://medium.com/fiercely-gentle/why-do-people-still-think-vegan-is-a-diet-9ae2ec6213e8

          • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah, I think that’s kinda bullshit though, because there are plenty of things I refrain from myself due to ethical concerns but I don’t get righteous about with strangers.

            For example, I think pickup trucks are unethical (for most people), because they’re dangerous on roads and environmentally wasteful, but I don’t patrol parking lots seeking to start fights with people driving pickups.

            I personally think that factory farms are disgusting, so I only buy free-range eggs. But I don’t judge people who buy cheaper eggs.

            You can practice your own ethics without throwing it into people’s faces. And besides, that strategy almost never results in converts.

  • HappyFrog
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m not even vegan, and I find that this meme both grossly misrepresents what veganism is about, and seems mean spirited.

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    eh, veganism doesn’t work for my relatively unique anatomy (if I eat that much fiber I go to the hospital) but were it not for that I’d probably be eating a plant based diet. people tend to know what works for them, and i’m not going to judge them for their dietary choices. Except foie gras.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      8 days ago

      I can side with the vegans that the meat industry needs to be clamped down on hard

      But eating meat in of itself is not wrong, that is what is natural

      • adr1an@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        If you prefer to live a natural life, be my guest. Go ahead, live by your logic as you expect from others. Hunt, kill, and process your own food ;)

      • flamingos-cant@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        84
        ·
        8 days ago

        There are plenty of things that are ‘natural’ that are wrong to do, why is eating meat any different?

          • Carnelian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            48
            ·
            8 days ago

            That misses the question a bit, no? Everything that is wrong to do is a personal choice. It’s not relevant to whether or not it should be done

            • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Not really, some things are objectively bad and wrong and other things are merely subjective.

              The problem we’re having here are people who hold their subjective beliefs very strongly are then adamant that it makes said beliefs objective, just because they believe them.

              • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 days ago

                even things like killing being bad is not objective in my opinion, it just simply stems from our minds and societies’ process of growth through natural selection.

                We believe that killing is bad only because we share the majority of their DNA and we are close genetically to what we’re killing. It was evolutionarily incentivised to not kill those that are genetically close, as they and we share common ancestors from which such thoughts evolved.

                this is imo why we value humans more than other animals, animals more than vegetables and relatives over strangers. Friends being valued more than strangers make sense as well, as they share ideas in the place of the shared genome.

                in a wider scope none of this matters anyway, our lives and deaths are irrelevant to the universe and our lives don’t actually matter outside what our minds tell us.

                • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Just to clarify I’m not saying that we should go around killing people, just that objectivity isn’t real in morality

          • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            See this is what I told people when they found out I had sex with my dog, and they said I was crazy and abusive! Like, it’s my own choice!

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              >inb4 some child left behind replies with “are you equating eating meat for sustenance with rape?”

              Yes. You could eat something else for sustenance. The reason you choose meat is because it’s a more enjoyable experience for you, despite the inherent harm. That sounds similar to another topic I mentioned in this comment

      • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Yes, but most people in the west don’t have the option to eat meat that are not from the meat industry.

        That is exactly why veganism is attractive in the west.

      • Blastboom Strice@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yo this seems to be a bad take

        I think something that defines humanity is that we really try not to follow the “rules of nature”, ie. the rule of the stronger over the weaker

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      What ever horror humanity has done, we are still holding the beer of invertebrates.

      And yet nature’s is is not a justification for aught. The fruit of the tree of wisdom (mythically) gave us empathy that we may live in harmony with neighbors, and in the late game, we have learned the imperative to see value in the fallow wilds.

      A century ago, a vegan diet for humans as extremely difficult, possibly impossible. And to quote Saruman the forests will burn in the fires of industry! And they have.

      We are not a vegan culture today because the food industry focuses on sales and profits, not on nutrition and health.

      Though to be fair our massive land-hungry industrial farms will affect the biomes around them regardless of whether we grow plants or ranch livestock. Veganism is part of a solution towards a more harmonious civilization, but misses several pieces.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Whoosh.

      E: For those downvoting, remember this is a shitpost and some level of inaccuracy is almost required. It’s the shit part of the post. Like, c’mon guys…

      • KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        8 days ago

        Vegans have to deal with arguments like this but unironically on the daily. That hits a nerve, wether it’s meant as a shitpost or not. Don’t take it personally.

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          And it gotten so bad, that some people will accuse you being a vegan if you’re not doing keto/carnivore diet, and thus an extremely militant and unpleasant one.

          • Whateley@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah, it’s totally unreasonable to get tired of hearing the same shitty comments and warmed over “jokes” every day.

            • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              It’s a shitpost on a shitpost community and they’re in here taking it like it’s a personal attack. They’re clearly the ones who need to calm the fuck down in this scenario lol

              The fact that it’s such an old, overused, and mostly not even correct only enhances its status as a shitpost. That’s what they’re all about

              • Whateley@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Calling it “jokes” and shitposting is the chickenshit’s ratfuck way of saying inflammatory things while attempting to avoid natural consequences. If you want to be an asshole to strangers on the Internet then at least have a spine about it.

          • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            8 days ago

            Ooh I know that one! They are in a social situation that involves food and the vegan politely declines an animal product. Then they make an anti vegan joke and the vegan politely disagrees. Have been there many times.

            • FelixCress@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Really? Because I have seen quite a few times vegan claiming that eating meat is a “murder” when people were trying to enjoy their steaks.

              Here on Lemmy one idiot even claimed that cutting sheep wool or something similar is a sexual assault

                • FelixCress@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  No doubt about it, but I am yet to see someone who eats meat calling for vegans to be forcibly fed meat - and I have seen vegans saying that eating meat should be forbidden.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 days ago

                I’ve seen quite a few times black people have abused welfare programs. Usually they’re posted under conservative accounts, and I get flamed in the comments for pointing out that these are videos posted by someone with an agenda who wants their audience to think certain things about certain groups of people without providing actual data on the subject

                Do you think maybe some of the videos of vegans being douchebags that you’ve seen have been posted by someone with an agenda who wants their audience to think certain things about certain groups of people without providing actual data on the subject?

          • WhiteRabbit_33@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            8 days ago

            Have you ever tried to not eat in front of people ever? Turns out it’s pretty hard to do. Sometimes, if you’re nice to people, you get invited to go out to eat to a place. Often those places have no vegan options, and you have to explain why you can’t eat there so people don’t just think you’re blowing them off constantly. We don’t just go around telling everyone we’re vegan like all the hate memes like to say.

            Most vegans I’ve met, myself included, don’t pick fights with people about veganism. We just live by example. It’d be cool if more people went vegan, but arguing with people about doing it doesn’t help. Doing that is like trying to push religion on people or make people experience empathy. It isn’t easy to go vegan (getting easier at least). Food is tied to a lot of people’s culture who have a hard time relearning how to cook/eat and make generational recipes or comfort foods they’ve always eaten.

            • kaprap@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Tell them to find a vegan inclusive place next time and go anyway, the animal is already dead and being a patron this one time to satisfy a friend and have a good time is fine

              • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 days ago

                You also have to keep in mind that it sucks to be a vegan sharing a meal with an omni. Even with access to plant-based options, we’re still required to be surrounded by what we see as gore, and people consuming gore.

                You know how smokers can’t smell smoke as well as nonsmokers? When I stopped consuming animals I was surprised to find that all meat, no matter how fresh, smells rotten. And everybody who consumes animals smells faintly like rotting corpses - especially during and right after eating.

              • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                the animal is already dead

                Never heard this one before. I think I’ll use it next time someone says that jerkin it to child porn is wrong. I mean, the harm is already done, right?

      • nimble
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        8 days ago

        Lmao. Look at OPs comments. They actually believe this shit. Based on all the other shitposts they post here and all throughout lemmy, they probably picked it up on reddit or some other trash site, thought it was funny, and came here to share.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Imagine making this literal exact comment under a post about black people committing a bunch of crime

        “Remember this is a shitpost, and some level of inaccuracy is almost required. It’s the shit part of the post” under a 13/50 meme

    • brb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      For me it’s 70% about trying to do something about climate crisis and 30% wanting to eat healthier

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    8 days ago

    As much as I admire the morality and overall health of vegetarian/vegan folks, I would also super respect anyone who got all their protein by monstering whole live mice that they caught by hand.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’d support a “you can eat all the meat you can catch and kill with your bare hands” diet.

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        Our ancestors have been using sharp sticks, heavy sticks, and sharp rocks since they could walk upright, so I’d support that, too.

      • otb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m vegetarian and my partner is vegan but neither of us are strictly against the “hunter and gatherer” approach.

        Where I live traditional hunting is almost nonexistent, but fishing and other ocean-based “hunting” (crabs, crays, oysters etc) is super popular. I’ve considered taking up spearfishing as it’s more intentional than throwing in a hook and dragging up whatever, and requires more (in my opinion) skill and nerve to pull off successfully. But even if I actually caught something the thought of cleaning it puts me off and I’d more than likely ruin it and waste a life for nothing.

        No issues with anyone that can fairly catch and prepare their own meat for themselves, but I’ll stick to my tofu and seitan for now.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          IMHO traditional hunting isn’t a problem at all. It’s sustainable and the animal gets a real life and a respectful death.

          I’m not gonna do it myself but I’m not going to tell some Inuit that his ancestors were all wrong.

    • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      8 days ago

      Vegans and vegetarians are not often more healthy than meat eaters. In fact a lot of them subsist mostly on junk food and ultra processed shit.

      I dunno about their morals. For me it depends on whether they are opposed to meat because they think it’s murder (absurd notion: see op) or because they opposed the treatment of living animals in industrial meat farms, which is the real issue.

      • transitinoir@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        8 days ago

        There is not only a treatment problem, but also that livestock eats a lot of calories that could be used elsewhere

        • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Are you gonna eat all those metric tons of corn that are produced to feed the cows? Because I sure as fuck won’t.

          I understand your argument but I think that it is just one way of looking at it and it is still more focused on human welfare rather than sentient life form welfare. Because of that I think the scale of meat production and the treatment is the problem. In a perfect society people would buy a cow to eat per year per 2 people in the household and we would have far more human treatment of a sentient species and they could be afforded good lives and painless deaths.

          Life by itself has no value, what is valuable is to what extent that life can be enjoyed.

        • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I just don’t think life by itself has any value, nor that death in itself is tragic. Life for me is valuable so much as you have the ability to enjoy it, and I think it to be the same for all sentient beings. But the reality is we are all interlinked and dependent on one another, we need to eat one another to survive. And so I don’t believe that animals dying is a tragedy in itself, I think an animal living in agony and then dying painfully is the real tragedy. We can eat them but we should have them live like kings before we eat them, in honor of their sacrifice.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Well, the first bullshit here is the word “purely”. While they indeed have a mainly vegan diet, they also opportunistically consume insects and even small mammals.

      • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Please fact check before posting, this is scientificaly inaccurate. Yeah they might eat a bug or two, but gorillas normally don’t eat other mammals.

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Please fact check before posting

          That’s literally here to fact check you, but ok.

          https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/what-do-gorillas-eat-and-other-gorilla-facts

          however, also have an appetite for termites and ants, and break open termite nests to eat the larvae.

          That’s not quite “a bug or two”.

          https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2828480/

          the gorilla population investigated (for which very little observational data are as yet available) may occasionally consume small vertebrates.

          https://kabiragorillasafaris.com/do-gorillas-eat-meat

          They occasionally consume tiny vertebrates and insects as well.

          Next time, check yourself.

          • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Your source:

            In addition to consuming a lot of plant matter, gorillas occasionally consume insects. Gorillas are not considered carnivores in the wild, despite the fact that they may consume meat when it is served to them in zoos. Although officially omnivores, gorillas primarily consume plants, including leaves, stems, bark, flowers, and fruits. They occasionally consume tiny vertebrates and insects as well.

            If all of humanity started to “occasionally consume tiny vertebrates and insects” while “primarily consuming plants” by tomorrow, which we could, we’d be way better off. Do you agree?

            • remon@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              Yes, I’ve read my source. What it says is that Gorillas are NOT purley vegan (which was your statement) while not contradicting anything I said.

              Even grazing herbivours, (cows, buffaloes) will occational eat small vertabrets. So not being considered “carnivores in the wild” doesn’t really mean anyhing. You don’t need to be carnivore (or even an omnivore) to not have a “purley vegan” diet.

              Which of course makes sense, because animals are opportunistic, not idealistic.

              If all of humanity started to “occasionally consume tiny vertebrates and insects” while “primarily consuming plants” by tomorrow, which we could, we’d be way better off. Do you agree?

              I certainly wouldn’t, but that wasn’t really the point.

              • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                Really, the only “true vegan” animals are probably Pandas and Koalas which is kinda meaningless as well considering they don’t eat anything else other than bamboo and eucalyptus, respectively

              • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Us humans are opportunistic animals as well, which has led to us destroying our global habitat. So we need to change or society will collapse in the not so distant future. There are a lot of things we need to address to survive the next century. The way we eat is one of them. And it’s the easiest, because you don’t have to get off your ass and protest, you don’t have to buy an expensive EV, you just change a habit and stop buying the destructive food next time your shop at the supermarket. You choose the food that saves ⅔ land use, waterpollution and co2-emissions. That’s my point.

                • remon@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  That makes sense.

                  My point was soley about Gorillas not having a purley vegan diet.

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Would it be to say its a herbivore rather than vegan?

          Then again, pretty sure most vegans end up eating a few bugs. Would a gorilla choose to eat mouse if presented with one?

          • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Yeah, this is just a vegan meme, no scientific theses. Gorillas sometimes eat a bug or two, and they have been seen eating small animals, but it’s not their usual diet. Look it up, they eat up to 30 kg of plant stuff per day, including leaves, stems, bark, flowers and fruits. That’s petty impressive.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      The human brain is fueled by about 20% of your caloric intake. We’re evolved to be omnivorous. This isn’t prescriptive but descriptive. It’s going to take development to make vegan food delicious and something we want to eat (and then all the other features we want out of food: cheap, storage-safe, easy to prepare, etc.)

      For those of us who still eat a meat diet, it usually takes a chef to make something actually enjoyable from strictly vegetables. Otherwise, we’re used to receiving oddly-spiced bland mush from our vegan friends. But we could do better if we were putting billions into it, and not another more-addictive cheeto.

      But we live entrenched in capitalism, so no one is going to take this seriously until we’re already dropping dead from natural disasters and famine.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        For those of us who still eat a meat diet, it usually takes a chef to make something actually enjoyable from strictly vegetables.

        chop brussels sprouts in half, toss with avocado oil with some salt and pepper, and air fry for 15-20 mins. toss some balsamic on em after they’re done.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Which is delicious! There are a number of things that are edible. But let me clarify…

          In most of the households I lived in with others, I just needed to wait less than a month before the women around wanted flesh and blood. Neither spinach (which has the iron they crave) nor tofu (high protein) cut it.

          And in the public, the mere smell of fast food burgers keeps them coming in. As long as dead animal flesh can be sold, it will be, and we don’t regulate it. (Yes, in India, cows are sacred, but chickens and goats certainly are not)

          There are plenty of individual dishes that are fine. But if you want well rounded nutrition, eventually you’re going to be resorting to the few high-protein things that are either uninteresting or a bitch to prepare.

          Now mind you, my kitchen savvy is limited. I’m learning, but slowly.

            • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              No, what I said was different from what was read. I’ll take the blame you like. I’m not trying to win an argument, and don’t think less of you if you fail to make a relevant point.

              I’m trying to clarify my position.

              I also wasn’t intending to imply we can’t or shouldn’t have to move away from meat (more on that below) but that society is going to be difficult to move in that direction.

              Though I would say eventually for sake of sustainability we’ll probably need to move to veganism or cultured meat or invertebrate protein, at least until we can get our space colonization and terraforming programs up to speed. But we’re probably going to starve via climate-crisis driven drought sooner than any of these solutions become popular.

              I do hope to be demonstrated wrong by the future, though.

              • Noxy@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                All I was trying to say is that it doesn’t take a professional chef’s level of skill to cook tasty and nutritious food without using meat.

                To address more of your post I originally responded to, I don’t think there’s any need for development or investment in vegan/vegetarian food, or meat alternatives.

                Plenty of delicious and nutritious food exists without requiring meat or animal products. And preparing such meals is not even remotely difficult or expensive, with the very important caveats of those food items being available for purchase without price gouging where folks live (like food deserts - think someone who can’t afford a car but whose neighborhood doesn’t have any real grocery stores), and some folks have dietary issues that may make eating meat the only practical choice.

                I think we agree that the problem exists and that a lot of people are too comfortable with the status quo to voluntarily change. I just don’t think it’s fair to suggest that meat-free food somehow isn’t good enough.

      • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Wow, I asked for the bullshit and you seriously delivered! Not sure if I should take the time to reply to this, because would it even matter?
        One thing, though: Everything you eat is vegan, except for the animal tissue, the milk-stuff and eggs. We don’t need capitalism to invest in more vegan meat alternatives, we fight it by eating plant based! No junk, just delicious fruits, nuts, legumes and vegetables, like we always did. It’s cheap, great for your body and for our suffering planet as well!
        Omnivores? We were lucky apes who found out that fire kills enough parasites and bacteria that live in meat. Dogs are the real omnivores, pigs are, too. They eat a rotting squirrel if the feel like it! We die if our bleach-cleaned chicken filet wasn’t in the freezer for a couple of hours.
        Do you know what elephants and hippos eat all day … damn, I just started replying.

      • agavaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        No idea what you are talking about. I’m not even vegan, but I can make a delicious vegan meal without even trying. All my vegan friends make very tasty food, too. No need for billions.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I have no question that everyone across the industrialized world would gladly switch to your delicious recipes.

          Maybe you should start a business!

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        For those of us who still eat a meat diet, it usually takes a chef to make something actually enjoyable from strictly vegetables.

        This is a joke, right? Have you ever tried pasta? Rice? Fruit?

        Edit: ramen, PB&J, Oreos, potatoes

        The skills you need to make vegetables taste good are the same as the skills you need to make meat taste good. I really hope you aren’t just, like, boiling chicken breasts and eating them unseasoned

      • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        In light of the west’s heavily animal-centric diets resulting in most of the top causes of death in these places, it’s not exactly accurate to call us omnivores. The centered on whole plant foods our diets are, the better off we are. Animal flesh, dairy, and eggs, at the very least, cannot be consumed without increasing progression and risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes (Ignoring a host of other harmful effects like cancer and autoimmune disorders, which is more contentious).

        It would be more accurate to say that we are primarily herbivores, but with an incomplete and dangerous emergency system for omnivory.

        • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Let’s put it this way, our bodies really like the smell, taste and mouthfeel of meat. So long as our system is focused on compelling people to eat via yummy food, there’s going to be a market for it. It’s not prescription, just description.

          That’s why I was saying we’ll have to overcome capitalism before we can really beat this. Otherwise actual balanced nutrition will be a < checks spelling > commodifiable feature of food, rather than its essential point.

          • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            Estimates have it that in the industrial world, somewhere between 1-5% of people are vegan. That remaining the same until your preferred revolution happens, and your idealized form of governance becomes the reality everywhere: how is your socioeconomic system going to get the remaining 95% of billions of people to stop consuming, committing cruelty to, and exploiting animals? Sorry, but we have to do whatever we can in the here and now, and there is urgency in time. It’s not only a matter of morality. We know that our wanton animal consumption is one of the largest drivers of climate change. We know that our society’s addiction to flesh and secretions have resulted in agricultural systems that not only resulted in one recent pandemic, but we are hanging on the edge of an even worse flu pandemic that can end up happening at any time. 75% of new infectious diseases have a zoonotic origin.

            In a world where ideal society has never happened and is always a dream away, we do not have the luxury of an either/or approach of fixing one problem before we think about the next.

            The toxic food environment is a reality, and that needs to be fixed in policy. But individual choice matters too, because what we choose to buy is what drives what is sold. Taste is dynamic and subjective. New diets are only temporarily less satisfying until the person develops the knowledge, cooking skills, and palate to start getting more satisfaction out of their foods. Even better, the difference in the way people feel when they adopt a whole-food plant-based diet for even as little as a couple of weeks, is a start contrast to the standard western diet. Experiencing the difference first-hand generates more motivation to continue.

            Also, our bodies do not inherently like the smell, taste, and mouthfeel of animal flesh. That is a learned habit. When a person goes long enough without consuming flesh, the very smell of it changes - even the freshest meats smell rotten, and the people who eat these foods smell like rotting corpses.

            • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’m not saying you’re wrong, but our elite class seems determined to stay there, and historically violent revolution is what unseats them and allows their wealth to be redistributed from their Scrooge McDuck vaults.

              Nonviolent resistance might work, but we haven’t seen the kind of mass wealth dispersion that will be necessary.

              And the elite are content to drive us right into extinction via the climate crisis and the plastic crisis. Even if you make technology that disrupts the meat market, they’re going to legally wrest control of it from you (unless you are rich enough to defend it from Nestlé). Regardless, when it comes to the climate crisis, the deal is done. The pooch is screwed. We know after the collapse the upper limit of sustainable population will be about one billion, and that number dwindles with each day of inaction.

              Meanwhile the industrial world is choosing far-right parties over the usual neoliberal crap we’ve endured through the latter half of the twentieth century, so we’re not even serious about managing the climate crisis without the aforementioned revolution (and in that case, into some kind of communal government, since the typical outcome of a people’s revolution is a chain of dictators).

              Good luck convincing our officials, elected or not, to choose veganism over the meat industry, or even nutrition over junk food. You will need all you can get.

              • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                So be the change, Uriel238! You are against suffering, slavery and destruction of our resources? Against the greedy elite who brutaly and recklessly exploit the weak instead of protecting them? (See what I did there?)
                Stop paying for dead animal parts next time you’re shopping at the supermarket! It feels really good to not take part in this evil system of misery and annihilation.
                I know veganism is not the only solution, but no solution will ever be enough without it. Plus it’s the easiest Fuck You to the ruling class, while we wait for a revolution.

                • Uriel238 [all pronouns]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  Dude, I already have doubts if I am worth my footprint, if we’re going to think in transactional terms. It’s easy to decide if cutting out meat is the only way I can make a difference, then why not cut out everything else as well? Should people kill themselves in order to spare nature the cost of their upkeep?

                  When we talk about the generation of greenhouse gasses, and the rising global average temperature, companies pollute in a day (in some cases, an hour) what humans produce across their lifetime. US suicides (49,000 per year, as of 2022, and rising with hate-crime and rampage killing rates) are barely a blip.

                  Maybe folks in the alt-right believe that human lives, at least the ones they don’t like, are worth less than the resources they consume, but a lot more believe the lives are worth the food and poop, which is, again, insignificant to the ever-burning fires of industry.

                  Quitting meat doesn’t stick it to the man in any significant way, any more than self immolation does.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The human brain is fueled by about 20% of your caloric intake.

        That explains most of shit vegans spread.

  • Saithe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    8 days ago

    I feel like this is the “attack helicopter” joke of veganism