• Matombo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Don’t forget that the whole Federation is a post captialist utopia which is a political statement in itself.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Don’t forget that the whole Federation is a post captialist utopia which is a political statement in itself.

      Great point!

    • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      “‘No need for/Evolved past the need for money’ … yeah, wtf, lets just completely ignore that ever-present bit, it’s too scary & perverted to comprehend.”
      - avg capitalists Trekkie (or “Trekkie”)

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Wait until people finally get the epiphany that Star Trek is advocating for a world government. And how many here, including outside the Internet, would actually like that?

    Precisely.

  • Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I like scifi. I like to explore the strange and push past the walls of reality. I like dangerous visions. Big ideas.

    But interpersonal drama, identity-stroking and, yes, politics. It’s just weak and boring. It’s small. Damn small.

    Do you see the difference?

    Sometimes startrek goes big. Sometimes it doesn’t.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      You need good characters to make a good show regardless of the setting, and also to help the viewers relate to the “big” stuff going on around them.

      Don’t get me wrong, I think I like the stuff you like. I’d happily watch a documentary about all the made up technology and new science & life they discover, with zero need for conflict or personal growth or “feelings” or whatever. But that wouldn’t be the TV show, which is experienced largely through the eyes of the crew.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Sci-fi is at its best when it recontextualizes an idea in a way that makes us consider it from a different perspective.

      Battlestar Galactica did an awesome job of turning the issues around entirely. Famously, it essentially turned the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan on their heads in Season 3, and you had the good guys building IEDs and employing suicide bombers to kill collaborators.

      But my favorite one was when they came up with a situation in which outlawing abortion was necessary, and the political opposition used it as an opportunity to manufacture outrage and steal an election even though they didn’t actually care about the issue at all.

      • Spiderwort@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        But you don’t need spaceships and aliens to do that. It’s just fetishwear at that point.

        In real scifi it isn’t fetishwear. It actually serves a purpose.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          The spaceships and aliens are how you get people to look at it from a new perspective.

          The early seasons of DS9 were about the aftermath of the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and the fall of the Soviet Union. 1990s Americans couldn’t have cared less about the dangers of far-right religious indoctrination of schoolchildren, the re-intrigation of traumatized resistance fighters into peacful society, the cautious restoration of political and economic ties with former occupiers, and the danger of the discovery of a new resource in the territory of a politically and militarily fragile nation full of extremists.

          But throw in phasers and a warp drive and people will watch. Suddenly you’ve tricked people into recognizing that people with different backgrounds and religions can embrace their differences to make the world a better place, or reject that unity and create suffering. You have capitalists and socialists sharing space in peace. There’s an invented taboo against rekindling an old relationship that’s actually about gay rights.

          All these amazing topics are brought to an audience that just wanted laser fights.

          Any genre show can do it. My parents were as red-blooded Republican as anyone, but the third episode of The Last of Us had them crying tears of joy and pain over the love story between 2 men. It tricked them into becoming open-minded by promising zombies.

          That’s fiction at its finest.

  • clockworkstone@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh, OG Trek was woke AF, but it wasn’t done as ham-handed and hackey as what is happening now. It used to feed open-mindedness into everyone’s living room and was generally welcome to do so. What we have now is just slapping you in the face with its floppy cock of wokeness every chance it gets. There is now almost no actual plot other than that. Doctor Who is doing the exact same thing. Can nothing of my childhood just be left the fuck alone? I mean, yeah, represent the marginalized. Make female heroes, or transgender, or whatever and whoever you feel needs to be represented or empowered. Do all of that, but do you have to rewrite absolutely everything ever written to do it? Have an original thought. Honestly, at this point, it is just lazy writing masquerading as woke.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’d also drag out Angel One from TNG. It’s the laziest way to write a matriarchy: everything is the same, except women are in charge instead of men.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m sure if we tried hard enough, we could find hackneyed, ham-handed episodes across all Star Trek shows.

          For example, this attempt at discussing gender norms:

    • Soulcreator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I think this comment really nails what’s irking me amount newer Trek. It used to be a show that was written in a way that regardless of your politics, anyone could watch, and it would make you think. It was a show that would sneakily slip in progressive ideas that could make you second guess your perspectives on the world.

      Now there is no depth to it, it just slaps you in the face with politics.

      This is probably gonna be a hot take, but I think Star Trek should be written in a way that is appealing for conservatives to watch, but regularly slips in metaphors which challenges their world view. Trek was at it’s best when on it’s surface it was a fun adventure show, and the politics was on a deeper level.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Explain more about how your childhood is ruined by political messaging in checks notes

      Modern Doctor Who and Star Trek. The best written and acted shows of all time, obviously.

      • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        21 hours ago

        it’s done plainly in reference to real life now, as opposed to being integrated seamlessly into the show. a good example would be the episode where the doctor had to erase his mind and Martha (a black woman) had to try and protect him while posing as his servant because it was the 1800s when they were stranded. this was still in real history (aliens aside) but was integrated as part of the plotline and not randomly mentioned with no context. a good example of when they get this wrong is the special with the meep where Donna’s daughter says something along the lines of “I’m nonbinary because the doctor-donna is binary” which doesn’t make sense in the story because the doctor-donna is binary due to Donna literally merging with the doctor, not gender identity. these things can be integrated well and when you do they only enhance the story by making it feel more realistic, but you have to make them fit the story, not the other way round.

    • uberfreeza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think this is generally what I hear when it comes to “woke” media. I always chalk it up to media having no clue on how normal humans function in a society.

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    1 day ago

    If first interracial kiss on TV is Woke then I don’t wanna be anything but.

  • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    It reminds me of those people that claim The X-Men have gotten “woke” even though that’s been the whole point of the comic since the 60’s or worse yet those poor souls out there who thought Rage Against the Machine was getting too political lol

    • Matombo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Reminds me of a YouTube comment under the video where they got cut of during a bbc live take for singing “fuck” after the production team brieft them to not sing fuck: “What machine they thought they rage against? The printer?”

  • FMT99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t know about woke but I liked Trek before it got boring and poorly written -_-

    • kshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yep, and they suck at analogies too. The old format usually had fairly enlightened people encounter an injustice, usually making it right in some way. It’s morality theater. Discovery made the Federation itself dark and edgy and the people on board a complete mess, not a world I’d like to live in. Maybe that’s what some people perceive when they complain about “politics”.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s basically all it is: Media getting “too big to fail” and then neutering its writing quality by committee. It tries to tell socially progressive stories at the same time, so people associate the two.

      A streamer pointed out the cognitive dissonance people have, when “anti-woke” people played Baldur’s Gate 3. It was gender expressive and diverse…but it was also GOOD writing. So they decided it was”wasn’t woke”.

        • Infynis@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Lower Decks is my favorite Star Trek since DS9. When it came out though, I was super against it. Didn’t think Paramount had any right to be making fun of Star Trek after Discovery season 1. You can tell Lower Decks is made by people that love Star Trek though.

          This last season, they did a classic Audience-with-the-Klingon-High-Council episode, and when I saw it, I exclaimed to my fiance, “Yes! I love Klingon bureaucracy episodes!” and then later in the episode, there was almost that exact same line

          Strange New Worlds has been finding their feet too. We got a courtroom episode on Augment rights, that really felt Star Trek, and they’ve had some original stories as well that I’ve really loved, like Among the Lotus Eaters. There have been a couple episodes I haven’t been a fan of, but what Star Trek hasn’t had those?

          If you’re open to it, I recommend giving both shows another chance!

      • LePoisson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I really tried to like that show but it’s just … Bad. To each their own but I’d rather just rewatch TNG or whatever other Star Trek. That show feels like it doesn’t have an identity, the writers couldn’t decide what kind of show they were writing and the acting is subpar.

        Of course, if you enjoy it that’s all that really matters - keep on watching and having fun!

        • __nobodynowhere@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          How far did you make it? Season 1 is a bit painful, Season 2 is better but Season 3 is a big shift.

          Seth McFarland’s humor is not very good…

          • longwand@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Season 3 was a surprise. They just played it straight. Went from parody to homage.

          • LePoisson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Not very far lol, a couple episodes to give it a fair shake though, do you have an episode recommendation?

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              Just echoing here that it does take awhile to get going.

              Honestly, despite what I’m about to say below, I probably wouldn’t recommend it now (just on signal to noise ratio) if not for https://thecinemaholic.com/the-orville-season-4/ giving hope for more story, or unless you happened to be a superfan of Seth McFarlane.

              My .02 -

              Season 1 -

              First reaction - wow this DOES feel like TNG.

              Second reaction - WAY too much Family-Guy style humor.

              I like humor in my scifi, and I like Family-Guy style humor (during its heyday anyhow). Season 1 episode 7 almost made me turn it off. No one trying to pay homage to trek should be writing in something like this as a first contact “mistake”. IMO in S1 we learned that Family-Guy style humor doesn’t always work in live action.

              Season 2 - Better, but still trying to find the right blend. It’s been awhile now, but I think S2 got better and better over time and had some pretty good eps.

              Season 3 - Really great, hit their stride, perfect blend of humor and drama, super disappointed when it was cancelled.

              Season 4 - See link above. If they can recapture S3 vibes I’m excited for it, but I’m not 100% confident they will. Fingers crossed.

               

              With all that said, if you are considering it at all, I’d just watch it all. That way you get the evolution of the show, the running gags, and don’t miss any significant bits that are sprinkled through, and you know all the road that has been traveled when they get to S4. It’s only three seasons and it’s not a long show. Yes, some of it is cringe, but so was some of the early seasons of TNG.

              • LePoisson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Thank you for the lengthy write up. You see though the problem with watching it all is I’d be watching it all… I do appreciate the time it must have taken for this reply though.

                That clip on YouTube you linked was super cringe. Agree with you on TNG there’s definitely times and episodes where I think the writers phoned it in and I’m not going to pretend it’s all good. Still my favorite star trek but I don’t watch much so that’s not saying anything considering I haven’t even seen any of the new stuff.

            • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Season 1 episode 10

              If you don’t like it I don’t think you will care for the rest

              Season 2 Episode 8-9 is a two part episode that is good but I wouldn’t recommend jumping into it because it’s not as good if you don’t care about the characters

      • FMT99@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can’t stomach McFarlane unfortunately. I’m told it gets better later on but his sense of humor is just like nails on a chalkboard to me. Couldn’t get myself to finish the first season.

        • Reyali@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          My partner and I have a theory that MacFarlane pitched The Orville as “Family Guy in space,” and he got to make it because of his success with Family Guy. But the actual goal he had all along was to make Star Trek.

          In order to keep the game up and get a second season, he had to sell the pitch at least a bit. So the early episodes are like Star Trek with cringey Family Guy-esque jokes. But as the series goes on, the cringe stops, the jokes slow down, and the plots get deeper.

          I can’t stand cringe humor and did not consider myself a fan of MacFarlane, but The Orville changed that.

      • Loce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Exactly. Orville is more “woke” and i absolutely love it. It’s supposed to be just a sort of comedy parody of star trek, yet it has more depth than the Discovery has.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    My favorite detail of the TNG episode “The Outcast” is that the writers were pushing for an episode that touched on sexuality but Rick Berman wouldn’t go for it. So the writers gave a figurative “fuck you” and wrote an episode on gender identity instead.

    And while Berman was occupied holding TNG back the DS9 writers had enough freedom to use the Dax symbiote’s multiple lifetimes to explore sexuality instead.

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The DS9 writers would sometimes write a script that they knew would be approved and then give the actors “suggested improvised lines” for what they actually wanted.

    • QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Does anyone else remember that TNG had a recurring background character who was just a regular crewman but he always wore a Star Fleet dress or skirt that would just walk around in the background of scenes? He may have had heels as well, I can’t remember. Regardless I always thought it was neat that they never made a big deal out of it or a joke