• NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    ·
    4 days ago

    …Trump took the unprecedented step of refusing to rule out military action to take territory from a Nato ally…

    what. the. fuck.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      4 days ago

      i’m guessing that heputin thinks that doing so would be enough to break apart the alliance or get the u.s. kicked out.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        4 days ago

        That would definitely do it. With the way Trump is talking Denmark might end up being forced to expel the US military from Thule to avoid a Chrimea scenario.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      What even happens if one NATO member attacks another? Does the aggressor immediately get their membership nullified and the rest must come together and declare war on them?

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        NATO immediately loses all credibility. Otherwise, nothing much.

        NATO was founded as a defensive pact against the Soviet Union.
        The only time it was ever used was as a tool by the US to force other countries to join the war in Afghanistan.
        Article 5 isn’t an automatism that forces all members to start an all-out war. They’re still sovereign.

      • Mirshe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean, it’s never happened. But the US declaring war on Danish territory would violate Article 5.

        • Nyoka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Intra-alliance fighting has always been a concern because of Greece and Turkey. Article 5 is probably the only reason they haven’t already gone to war. But yeah the US would fight all of European NATO that answers the call, win a pyrrhic victory, and destabilize Europe for the next 100 years.

          • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            US wouldn’t win, that would be the best time for China to overtake them on the global stage