Our poll results show that only a minority of you want the thinner phones that Apple and Samsung are promising.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Yup just what I want: giant, wafer thin, easily cracked garbage phones that cost $1600. /S

    I’ve seen the light and I’m not going back. From now on I don’t care how chunky the phone is, I don’t want it to not fit in my pocket due to its stupid phablet dimensions.

  • Zero22xx
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I want something between ‘feature phones’ and smartphones. A little bit like what Nokia had to offer with Symbian and Maemo but more modern. If you want a rectangle of glass that requires wireless proprietary everything and replacing every time the battery starts packing up, more power to you, I’m a fan of choice and options.

    But I want to be able to buy a music phone with great speakers and toys like FM transmitters thrown in. Or a gaming phone with a d-pad, a, b, x, y and shoulder buttons. But like, with Firefox instead of Opera Mini. And social media apps and shit.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Let’s see, decreased durability, decreased battery life…what are the advantages again?

    That being said AA should (and probably does) know better. Their audience is not representative of the typical consumer.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Not very impressive when you also make it longer and wider. You’re just pancaking the phones.

    Were in desperate need of a small thick, emovable battery / sdcard pocket rocket.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      My Oneplus 6, Oneplus 9, and Pixel 8 Pro are all around the same size. The best one from feel alone is the OP6 because it feels solid and it’s a bit heavier. Lighter and thinner are way less interesting to me compared to the possibility of 3 day battery life, a headphone jack, or modular construction.

  • HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 hours ago

    True. I want a bulky ass phone with more power, more storage, more battery life, and more accessory compatibility. I want a BRICK

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I want a small screen (about 5"), headphone jack, and unlockable bootloader. That’s all.

      • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Hotswappable batteries and an option for a keyboard would be nice too. Virtual keyboards seem like they’re getting shittier (at least on Android) and they never matched the accuracy of a regular keyboard.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        For my own use, I don’t care much, but I agree in theory. My 128gb Pixel 4A has 32gb free and I do not actively manage space on it. Android’s handling of SD cards is kind of terrible, making them mostly useful for media files. If I did much photography or videography with my phone, I’d want this more.

  • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Slim phones are coming, but most of you don’t want them

    Our polls show that, if anything, you want thicker phones.

    Yeah, some poll on a site for tech nerds is not really representative of the general public. Thick phones with huge batteries exist and they sell like shit, it’s a super niche market.

    Expect these thin phones to sell like hotcakes.

    • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s because everytime I see a thick phone it’s the size of my arm. In the same way a wafer thin phone is shit, so is 13 bricks glued together vertically.

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        A wafer thin iPhone won’t be shit though. It will be slick as shit. Sure, there will probably be compromises and it won’t be suitable for the most demanding users, but most people aren’t that demanding of their phone. As long as it manages to get through one day it’ll be good enough.

        Don’t underestimate how important the size, weight, build quality and design is to the user experience. I have a 13” M4 iPad Pro which is also crazy thin yet feels absolutely solid and that makes it look and feel like a magical piece of technology. It has a huge impact on how it feels and that is ultimately what matters to people. Not the specs or the benchmarks, but how it feels to use it.

        • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          If it’s wafer thin it isn’t going to fit the battery I want it to fit. Thin, yes, wafer thin no. I understand size matters which is why the 20,000mah battery phones aren’t good either. iPad isn’t a fair comparison to a phone, more battery space

          • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            If it’s wafer thin it isn’t going to fit the battery I want it to fit.

            Personally I don’t care about the size of the battery, I care about how long it lasts. There have been rumors that Apple is working on improved battery tech. Their SoCs are also crazy efficient and super fast.

            What I expect to happen is that they will equip the iPhone Air with this next-gen battery tech (probably not a massive improvement, but something like 10-20% more energy in the same volume would already be a big win), combined with a throttled down SoC with fewer cores (still plenty fast for anyone but the most demanding users), that will allow them to reduce power usage by a lot. Add to that the already excellent power-management in iOS, maybe tweaked a little more aggressively, and they’ll have a phone that’s super thin and lasts all day.

            People will hold this phone for 3 seconds and be sold.

            • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              A 20% improvement on batteries wouldn’t make it wafer thin though. I get your point about how long it lasts being the part that actually matters, I just don’t see us having phones people want to use that can last a full day and are that thin. At least not anytime soon.

              People right now buy phones that have way way more performance than they’d ever need, all the time, I don’t expect that to change for the general market.

            • desktop_user
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              having a larger battery capacity can allow you to charge other devices from the phone, like wireless earbuds.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s what I don’t get. If they can make a phone that is thinner but lasts 2 days, why not double the battery and make it last 4??

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m going on 9 years with this current phone. I want my next phone to last double that, at least.

    • dingus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Wow, what phone is still working fine after 9 years???

      I feel like 5 years is generally the upper limit of usage due to battery issues, spontaneous hardware failure, slowness due to advancing tech standards, etc. A user serviceable device would be able to help with some of these things but still…

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s a Samsung A5 (not Galaxy). I didn’t really think much of it when I got it, and it started to slow down a few years ago, but I just keep clearing space to speed it up and it just keeps working. Would probably last 2 full days on the battery, so never have to think about that as long as I charge it over night. Not to shill, but at this point I’m rightly impressed. It just works.

        Some apps like Slack have stopped working on it, but nothing that would make me switch to a newer phone.

  • Anarki_
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    17 hours ago

    People are still gonna bolt a protective case, screen protector, popsocket, magnifying glass, and a hairdryer to their phone so what does it matter?

    • Azzu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      0.5 + 0.3 < 0.8 + 0.3

      what kind of argument are you making, wtf

      Let’s just make all phones 5cm thick, obviously it doesn’t matter?

      Obviously thinner is better if you don’t have to compromise on anything else

      • Anarki_
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’m kidding. I thought it was obvious when I added the hairdryer bit.