• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s a money-sink and local governments don’t like that. The first things financially cut when I worked for a city of 170,000 were always services that didn’t make money. That’s just how it works.

    The whole point of government is to collect taxes to pay for stuff that isn’t revenue generating to spread out the costs!

    • bamboo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      But that’s socialism, noooooo \s

        • HappyFrog
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          In what definition or context is this true?

          • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            All of them? I’m not sure I understand the question.

            First result on google for “socialism definition” as an example

            a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

            Governments running businesses is what “owning the means of production” means, in every context, by every definition.

            • HappyFrog
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I think we think of “profit” differently, but sure.