minus-squaresmittenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-23 months agoAh yes, the well known i5.90689059561 Edit: i5.90689059560851852932405837343720668462464580071706167251050905035703300440298377837242021827745839719063803418530941917054164942532445171041739
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 months agoOK, I am dumb. Can you explain what that is?
minus-squaresmittenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 months agoI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
minus-squaresmittenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
Ah yes, the well known i5.90689059561
Edit: i5.90689059560851852932405837343720668462464580071706167251050905035703300440298377837242021827745839719063803418530941917054164942532445171041739
Is this what over-clocking is?
OK, I am dumb. Can you explain what that is?
deleted by creator
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
deleted by creator
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks