minus-squaresmittenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 days agoI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
minus-squareTyfud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agooh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
minus-squaresmittenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 days agoI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
oh, that’s actually clever. And I’m saying that as a software engineer. I missed that possibility :)
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks