minus-squaresmittenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·3 months agoI’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
minus-squaresmittenlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 months agoI should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks
deleted by creator
I’m not actually, just that a binary integer that overflows at 60 couldn’t exist, hence the 5.907 whatever bit length
deleted by creator
I should have phrased it differently, like “Ah yes, the well known 5.9068905956 bit integer.” But thanks