• mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If you post censored shit I’m going to PM you shittingdicknipples and lemonparty.

    /shakes tiny fist wistfully

  • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Counterpoint: a greater number have touched a vagina (but that framing doesn’t obsess over a woman’s sexual purity, so, clearly less important)

  • MudMan@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I should hope so. If somebody shook my hand and, while maintaining eye contact, and confessed they’ve been free-willying every pee of their life, hands behand their head, I would have to seriously reconsider our relationship.

  • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Never thought about it but obviously everyman has had a dick in his hand for obvious reasons. And all females old enough for sexual interactions have had one in their hand. This is now stuck in my head. The next time I shake the hand of a woman I am going to wonder how many dicks she has had in that hand.

    • not_IO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      bro is gonna loose it when he learns about lesbians

      • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Honestly curious about this. I don’t think that people turn into homosexuals. They either are or aren’t at birth. But in the case of lesbians, which you raised, I wonder how many have at least once experimented with at least one hetero interaction which would involve penis holding

    • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Hey, uh, don’t refer to male humans as “men” and then female humans as “females” like that. It’s kinda dehumanizing.

      Like, I get calling men, “males” and women “females”, because I’ll do that sometimes (I claim fur-brain as my defense, because calling anthro characters “man” or “woman” is weird); but try not to do the thing where you say “men” then “females” as if we’re a complete different species. That’s… just… not appropriate in a normal context.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Good god, that’s what I came to say. Thank you.

          We got the lemmy police on here though. “You can’t say that word!”

        • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes! I’ve been trying to figure out what the fuck the difference is for a long time but for some reason that explanation kept eluding me; I don’t mind being called “a female [blank]”, but just being called “a female” bothers me. But that’s it right there, it’s when it’s used as a noun.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      LOL. The politically correct police are on your ass tonight!

      I cannot believe the seriousness of these replies. What is it the kids say? “Touch grass”?

      • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It is amazing how so many people cannot simply joke around. Politics so consume their lives every single thing in life is viewed only in that context. And not only cannot they not simply joke around they are on a mission to impose their views on anyone who disagrees with them. What a sad way to go through life. Social media in general is all a joke. And this group specifically is all about just getting a laugh.

        • Vivian (they/them)
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Impose their views on people who disagree with them? Damn that’s crazy, people want others to treat people with respect and not be bigoted? How political

          • Mickey7@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Of course “bigoted” is in the eyes of the beholder. And those judging have no real idea if a person joking around is actually a bigot.

        • not_IO
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          (lemmy is technically correcting about everything): i sleep (correcting about geneder) REAL SHIT

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      16 hours ago

      everyman

      females

      Everywomen/everymales

      all [women] old enough for sexual interactions have had one in their hand.

      Nah.

    • LostXOR@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You’re assuming all women of sufficient age have had sex, which is just not true. Many women (and men) don’t have an interest in sexual activity, or haven’t had an opportunity to engage in it, regardless of age.

    • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Gonna has to go piece by piece through this:

      obviously everyman has had a dick in his hand for obvious reasons.

      This line is trans-exclusive, which would probably be given a pass by all but the most ardent trans-inclusive commenters, but still not great.

      And all females

      Dude. There are some times when an argument is made that saying “females” is not inherently objectifying, especially in a scientific, military, or other setting where people are categorized that way, with the significant difference being consistency (e.g. man/woman, male/female, etc). Using one then the other strips all that away and makes it seem like referring to women as “females” is just your normal tendency, which strongly suggests the objectifying behavior.

      And all females old enough for sexual interactions have had one in their hand.

      This is just obviously wrong, as plenty of lesbians, asexual people, or those with lack of access to sexual connections with others have not had a dick in their hands, and that is not an insignificant percentage of women, I’d imagine.

      The next time I shake the hand of a woman I am going to wonder how many dicks she has had in that hand.

      As if to underline the “females” comment, it’s pretty telling that you feel it worth mentioning that you’re going to wonder how many dicks were in the hands of women, but not men (especially funny since any man you meet has most likely had a dick in his hand more recently than a woman).

      Sometimes it is difficult to notice your own biases, so I hope this makes you think about what leads you toward thinking like this, and just general self-reflection.

      • ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I hate that OP is on my radar now but they seem to be constantly testing the bigotry waters, seems like possible ban evasion as well

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Men/Women Male/Female

      Those are the pairings you wanted. But, for fun, try swapping them next time and see what kind of attitude folks get.

      Male/Women

      Do it. Rustle some jimmies.